Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Trying to work out easiest and best location to fit up a front towhook for cams events. I bought a strap one but unsure where to put it as the intercooler etc are in the way of getting to chassis rails. I'm assuming bumper support is not enough strength?

Normal towing it won't need to be too strong but if I need to be pulled from deep sand or something it's gotta be strong.

Anyone got pics? Or suggestions?

Also are the factory rear tow points ok for cams events as the rules say they need to have a 40mm internal diameter hole and the rears don't.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433299-making-towhook-for-32-gtr/
Share on other sites

At worst they'll have to tow your car out of the kitty litter - I don't think they need to be super strong. The min diameter is more about fitting their shackle or hook through the loop. You could put a big bow shackle through the loop, or make up a webbing strap to go through the hoop so they can connect to this.

In rallying we have to worry about pulling the car up an embankment, so tow hook strengths need to be much higher. Most aren't, though. In that case you'll likely end up running chains / slings around the axle or cross member. Of course it will be the driver who gets to lie in the mud and do this, not the recovery crew. (speaking from experience)

Mine is a strap bolted to the end of the chassis rail where the reo bolts on....has always worked OK. It comes out through a small slit in the front bar. I prefer the strap to a solid hook going forward for both my car's sake and whatever I am tapping on.

But as warps said that setup wasn't sufficient for mark's rally car....it got about halfway back out of the gully when the strap snapped....4 more rolls on top of the original 7. But I guess you are never going to reuse a shell after the first few rolls anyway :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...