Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 Street/track Build

JimmyChinga
 Share

Recommended Posts

JimmyChinga Rookie

JimmyChinga

Posted
Posted

never made a thread on here before so i thought it might be time.

my 32 gtst that was meant to be a streeter but i recently parted my track car so this is slowly getting less street spec and more track.

still running the rb20 with standard mods. 25turbo, cooler, exhaust. slideworx coilovers and all adjustable arms except for upper camber and castor rods which i custom made myself.

have also recently put a bee*r in just out of curiosity. i figure if its going to blow a motor then an old rb20 is a good test without too much concern.

exterior is just type m kit and gtr spoiler.

heres a few pics
wheel fitment here is 17x9 +/-0 and 17x9 -5 on the rear. 205/45 all round.

2m67ho8.jpg

pic from a recent track day

156u2bk.jpg

current interior with the hydro and some ridiculous handbrake i made for the lolz. got some brides to go in and some interior changes on the go at the moment

xljpr8.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433471-r32-streettrack-build/
Share on other sites
White GTS-T Mentor

White GTS-T

Posted
Posted (edited)

You should post up the video you put on skateboard.com.au. Did you cut and shut those knuckles yourself? You could run spacers or lower offset wheels. Failing that, you could extend the lca.

Nice 32.

Edited by White GTS-T
JimmyChinga Rookie

JimmyChinga

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cheers dude.

Here's the clip I think your talking about.

It's from a weekend with primal garage up in Shep.

The knuckles were cut and shut myself. The solution I have come to today after a lot of googling is just extending the LCA 35mm which should take care of my caster clearance. Will put up some pics tomorrow when I finish them

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...