Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So you're saying a car doing a 1.5 60ft time will have the same mph as a car with a 2.2 60ft time?? I dont think so.

60 footers are only an indication on how well your car hooks up and leaves the hole. Doesnt have anything to do with power.

Is it being implied that a bad 60ft will result in higher or lower trap speed?

Also, not hating, but can anyone explain the allure to owning the most powerful anything, anywhere? Would just like to know the motive behind it, as its quite different from the fastest etc.

Or is this more so the car is being built to a purpose and it just might happen to also be the most power, which is a lot more reasonable in my mind.. But building a motor to simply have it be the most powerful I can't understand.

Wtf now that rb25 make no power comment is there lol I looked twice it was gone before! Well im here to prove you haters wrong

Haha, sorry you thought it was hate, all cos I left out the smiley face. I thought it was pretty obviously sarcastic considering that this is a skyline forum! Sorry for the confusion.

Are you planning on putting your car down the strip?

It is the most powerful RB25 in the world, but isn't Australia based so not so relevant. The one in the UK from a few years ago was also up there in power

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Is it being implied that a bad 60ft will result in higher or lower trap speed?

Always lower. BUT if the car has huge amounts of power it will still post up a good mph. as stated 60 footers show how good a car hooks up and well the driver can drive the thing out of the hole.

For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_adV15DzTo

Is it being implied that a bad 60ft will result in higher or lower trap speed?

Also, not hating, but can anyone explain the allure to owning the most powerful anything, anywhere? Would just like to know the motive behind it, as its quite different from the fastest etc.

Or is this more so the car is being built to a purpose and it just might happen to also be the most power, which is a lot more reasonable in my mind.. But building a motor to simply have it be the most powerful I can't understand.

The car was built to be a bit of everything. Certainly not max power. But that comes as a bonus. As I am not going to go down the drag only route I dont really care for times. I will take it down to see what it runs but im not going overboard on trying to run crazy times.

Also im not here to argue about what 60ft times mean and how they affect mph. Though I will say, having a slower 60ft time essentially determines where your run starts from. So it will affect your top end mph. An auto set up on slicks will not run same mph as a manual on street tyres, ive seen it happen. Anyway back on topic, I just wanted to see where my 25 stood against others that have been built in aus.

Rb25s dont make power?? Lol ok

My car might be back on dyno this week

So you're saying a car doing a 1.5 60ft time will have the same mph as a car with a 2.2 60ft time?? I dont think so.

You have much to learn grasshopper.

Lol dude ive personally ran identical runs but different 60ft times and the mph can vary 2 or 3mph. Thats a shit 118 run. Take that up to 140mph and the difference will be over 5mph. Explain to me how a car slipping and sliding thru 1st and second can possibly get the same top speed over a given distance compared to a car that just grips up and goes?? Im curious to hear your answer.

You are just dragging your own topic off topic, there are too many variables to consider and you will most definitely not be the only person here who has done enough drag racing to form opinions on patterns - it'll just turn into a flamefest. For what it's worth I've run everywhere from 12.6 to 13.5 with 1.9 to 2.5s 60ft times and trapped between 110-112mph for practically all of them (and launch was not the only thing that changed - tyre pressure, cleanness of gear shifts etc all were tested or perhaps not done as well as possible every time), I tended to see a bigger difference in trap speed when I missed a gear or hit a limiter than on a bad 60ft. Not saying this will be the same for everyone, just saying it's part of my experience.

Here are a couple of time slip break downs from past runs from my car - two completely different events, I was ALWAYS in that speed range. Different tyres for the 12.6, same power.

0-60 Foot ET: 2.247
1/8 Mile ET: 8.849
1/8 Mile MPH: 87.240
1/4 Mile ET: 13.330
1/4 Mile MPH: 111.580
0-60 Foot ET: 1.906
1/8 Mile ET: 8.186
1/8 Mile MPH: 88.880
1/4 Mile ET: 12.634
1/4 Mile MPH: 111.300
I am sure with 600kw things might change a bit of course haha
  • Like 1

Well I did say im not here to argue the point but if it keeps getting brought up im all for hearing others opinions. Got a touch up tune on the 33 last night, cold ambient temps but on 24psi highest intake temp was 31deg! Awesome results for the new cooler. Will have it on dyno soon to see exactly what the difference is and also to wind the boost up.

Yep, thought it'd be worth seeing that to ponder on if nothing else - they're all on dragtimes.com for an R33 GTS25t Skyline, I put them in there years ago so I haven't just filtered out ones to prove a point.

Anyway yes - dyno results sound like a good thing, is it going on today? And how high was it getting before? Good luck, again :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...