Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I've just bought a TurboTech MBC as I'd like to erase the stock 2-stage solenoid in anticipation of a high-flow turbo and Nistune later down the track. For now I'll only be running 10psi through the stock turbo and R34 GT-T SMIC.

I've heard good things about the TurboTech controller holding and sustaining steady levels of boost, and have bought a VDO 25PSI mechanical boost gauge in order to set the correct level of boost. VDO are apparently pretty accurate and reliable gauges, and I obviously wouldn't trust the factory dash ornament with my engine's health.

My question is, once I have set the controller to my desired boost level, can I safely remove the VDO boost gauge and set it aside for tuning purposes, knowing the controller will safely hold my desired boost. I don't want to mount gauges in the cabin as it attracts unwanted attention and looks tacky. I guess the real question is, are MBC's generally 'set and forget' or over time will boost wander and stray from the original setting?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/436661-running-without-a-boost-gauge/
Share on other sites

usually set and forget, and the factory boost gauge isn't that bad.. it's pretty accurate..

also note if your car spikes over 0.7 bar the ECU will drop timing & dump in fuel so even if the MBC fails you still have some sort of fail safe :)

Actually, R&R isn't a single number. The TP limit is the simple hard cut you get when the load is simply too high. R&R is effectively nothing more than ridiculously rich and ridiculously retarded values in the top right corners of the fuel and timing tables. The fuelling numbers are well over 100% duty cycle (stock injectors of course) for example.

Sounds like you've got a good plan but I just want to add something about the TurboTech MBC.

I used one on a turbo honda prelude about 2 years ago and I had trouble with consistency, even running external gate low boost (10psi). The adjuster bolt can be locked using the supplied lock-nut however it would come loose after 10 or so days and it was the gauge that told me. I tried tightening it however it was cheaply made and broke in my hands.

Having said that, the ball & spring type MBC's are generally well liked as they provide the best response compared to simple bleed valves. I wouldn't buy a TT MBC again.

just my 2c, good luck with it

edit: Just also want to say that running a modified turbocharged car you probably should have some sort of boost monitoring equipment in the cabin. If you don't like gauges there are digital options too

Edited by Blackkers

Actually, R&R isn't a single number. The TP limit is the simple hard cut you get when the load is simply too high. R&R is effectively nothing more than ridiculously rich and ridiculously retarded values in the top right corners of the fuel and timing tables. The fuelling numbers are well over 100% duty cycle (stock injectors of course) for example.

I'm having a little trouble running into the knock maps at the moment, only slight knock detected by the sensors but no knock I can hear with my knock ears?

I've backed off the timing and fuel maps to stock, whilst keeping the boost up to 13-14 psi on the stock rb20 turbo. Are these the two tables I need to adjust? and any tips on how to approach it?

gallery_89296_5394_50518.jpg

the 2nd table is the TP limit I was referring to, i.e. when you exceed an amount of boost it cuts (feels like you've hit a brick wall).. as for the first table you've opened I don't recall ever seeing it/using it.

In terms of the knock table, I don't believe there's a sensitivity table to adjust when it falls into the knock table. I believe Matt from Nistune was still working on that (last time I read somewhere)

I think one way to combat the adjuster being close to maxed out (ie screwed nearly all the way out) would be removing any line restrictions in the signal pipe. This would allow a higher pressure to reach the boost controller and necessitating a few more turns of the adjusting screw clockwise to achieve the same wastegate pressure. Ill sus that out when I receive it though.

Cheers on the explanation of the ECU's R&R/TP load index, helpful to know.

Sounds like you've got a good plan but I just want to add something about the TurboTech MBC.

I used one on a turbo honda prelude about 2 years ago and I had trouble with consistency, even running external gate low boost (10psi). The adjuster bolt can be locked using the supplied lock-nut however it would come loose after 10 or so days and it was the gauge that told me. I tried tightening it however it was cheaply made and broke in my hands.

Having said that, the ball & spring type MBC's are generally well liked as they provide the best response compared to simple bleed valves. I wouldn't buy a TT MBC again.

just my 2c, good luck with it

edit: Just also want to say that running a modified turbocharged car you probably should have some sort of boost monitoring equipment in the cabin. If you don't like gauges there are digital options too

Interesting. I am running TurboTech V2 MBC and originally bought it as several articles suggested that the ball & spring design is better than a bleed valve. However, both times the car has been tuned (originally 199rwkw @ ~11psi, now 257 @ ~17psi) my tuner has commented that they had some trouble tuning with it, and recommended a basic TurboSmart one instead if I want to stay with a MBC. Perhaps I should go electronic...

More on topic, I have never had a boost gauge as my GTT came with the navi unit instead of the triple gauge cluster. It would be good to have a reading but I don't want a big gauge either - can anyone recommend an accurate but affordable digital one?

When I tuned my RB20 I made the knock maps the same as the main maps and just took 1-2 degrees and added a tiny bit of fuel in the areas most likely to knock....just for a little paranoid safety. I did this because the RB20 knock sensors seem to like detecting knock even when no-one else can hear it. Either that or they hear nothing when it's pinging its tits off. Either way, at least half of them are useless.

As to the TTP max and TP limit tables, just a correction. TP limit is the "boost" cut. That is the table that will cut the ECU when AFM calculated load exceeds the max in the table. If you're tuning a modified engine simply raise it to 255 all over and forget about it. If you want to keep it, raise it to the highest TP values you ever see at any rpm + 15% or so.

The TTPmax values are the maximum actual injector pulswidth allowable at any give rpm. This table places a limit on how much fuel you can inject because sometimes you get a few different tables and other scalars all contributing to enrichment and if they all had their way you'd inject too much juice. So if they sum to more than the TTPmax, then the result gets clipped at TTPmax. TTPmax and TTPmin may need to be changed if you change AFM/injectors because they don't necessarily scale properly. TP limit needs to be changed if you do AFM/injectors also but it scales properly and so Nistune (can) do it for you.

RB20 R&R is actually different to what I said in my first post. My first post was relatively RB25 specific. Thje RB25 scheme seems to have been intended to prevent anyone ever actually approaching the point where the engine might get hurt, by dumping in huge amounts of fuel and no timing in the main maps once you get past the stock boosted region. The scheme in the RB20s seemed to be much less a built in R&R in the maps, much more sensible fuel and timing munber in the main maps, followed by more conservative values in the knock maps. If you manage to get it to ping, it'll change maps. If it still pings then the RB20 ECU seems to be able to pull a further amount of timing out. I assume the RB25 ECU is able to do the same, but no-one ever really gets there.

Thanks gtsboy,

So what I have got to answer is why its changing to the knock maps, and it seems by your answer the only thing that will do it is the knock sensors. I was hoping that it may have been the TP load limit not coping with the extra boost.

If the sensors do flip it over to the knock maps, shouldn't this register as a #34 fault code? I've checked after a run and I just get the same 55 all clear?

It was only when I changed the knock timing to 5 deg and recorded a run in tuner mode that it became obvious it was swapping maps, yet in stream mode nistune would never light up the knock maps to indicate which map it was reading, it would only ever have the main maps shaded green. I'll have to get on to Matt about that.

Cheers Mike.

I had a similar thing going on, although that was a few years (and therefore a few versions of Nistune) ago. We saw my (RB20) ECU switch over to knock maps whilst dyno tuning, even though we couldn't hear any knock and the tune was near stock (and mixtures were fine). That's why I ended up doing what I did with the knock maps. But on another version of Nistune at some other time I couldn't see it changing under the same circumstances.

I've never seen knock maps activated raise a DTC flag. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but I haven't seen it.

Yea I don't intend to run over .7 bar for now.

With a Nistune tune, are the R&R parameters increased to a higher value, allowing more airflow, or is R&R scrapped all together?

R&R isn't really a thing as much as a zone in the tune, there is a max airflow limit which will cut the engine out but R&R is just the upper end of the revs at high load, eg it is very rich and retarded, a retune will fix this as they will put appropriate values in those cells.

I use an eboost street boost controller which has a digital guage but I hide it in the car, so I can look at it if tuning or troubleshoot but no point having a big tacky LOOK MR POLICEMAN gauge in your car imo.

I'm having a little trouble running into the knock maps at the moment, only slight knock detected by the sensors but no knock I can hear with my knock ears?

I've backed off the timing and fuel maps to stock, whilst keeping the boost up to 13-14 psi on the stock rb20 turbo. Are these the two tables I need to adjust? and any tips on how to approach it?

Ignore the knock maps, they aren't reliable enough to be trusted, nissan only detect knock at low rpm as well, at high rpm there is too much mechanical noise so they are ignored. Sometimes they will pick up knock that isn't real knock and sometimes they will miss real knock. You could put -2 degrees in the entire map and copy it to the knock maps, at least you will know when they are being used.

the 2nd table is the TP limit I was referring to, i.e. when you exceed an amount of boost it cuts (feels like you've hit a brick wall).. as for the first table you've opened I don't recall ever seeing it/using it.

In terms of the knock table, I don't believe there's a sensitivity table to adjust when it falls into the knock table. I believe Matt from Nistune was still working on that (last time I read somewhere)

I would personally use the TPLimit and not nuke it completely, add 10% to the max you ever see in top gear, that way if you blow your boost control line off and run infinite boost you are less likely to pop the motor.

Edited by Rolls

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey Dave, welcome aboard! Good to see another soon-to-be Stagea owner here. The wagons are awesome — plenty of space, still got that Skyline DNA, and loads of potential if you’re into mods. Definitely post up pics when you get it, everyone here loves seeing new builds. What model/year are you looking at?
    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
×
×
  • Create New...