Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cross flow is the one which deletes factory pipework and u cut hole in battery tray. This the one u were thinking ?

The other type is turn flow - end tanks are return so u can keep factory intake pipework

It's efficiency will change depending on duty time, and ambient temperature. I would say it would support 500+kw of flow, as long as there is enough air passing through it to keep it cool. Stock GTR intercoolers flow 500kw, so this one being slightly thicker and better quality core should be fine.

You might as well go with a 120mm core if you plan to upgrade. :P

  • 7 months later...

Nothing much different in the core. Turn flow just have the tank on the driver's side with an outlet at the top or bottom so you can send the cold pipe back towards the LHS of the car (either along the top of the core or underneath the core). This allows you to put the pipework through the factory holes. Because you have to make room for the return pipe, the core can't be as tall, and generally because the outlet of the RHS tank tends to clash with headlights/bumper supports etc, the core often needs to be a bit shorter than you can get away with on a straight through design.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Physically, you'd expect it to turn the motor 11/8ths faster than a standard one, but I'm not sure of specifics
    • Ironically the GTT was quite reliable in the 7 years of ownership. From memory I've only had to replace a radiator and coilpacks out of inconvenience 
    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
×
×
  • Create New...