Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Std high flow makes 100kws at 3000RPMs and maxing out at 320rwkws on E85. Note this turbo hit 20psi at 3400RPMs, there isn't many turbos out there can do this without chocking the engine tho. Pump 98 fuel usually makes 40kws less. It is cheaper then what cost you to buy a TD06, after testing all this TD06 based turbos, I'm fairly sure it is far more responsive then any thing based in a 10cm turbine and makes more power internally gated.

Added 270214:

labeled dyno reading from 21U high flow internally gated on Stock manifold E85 (take 40kws off for P98 result)

21uhfpowerlabeled.jpg

How does the 2IU highflow compare to the atr43ss1PU?

Looks like they both get full boost at 3400, but the ss1pu has 30rwkw more in it? How much physically bigger is the front cover on the ss1pu compared to the highflow?

What's the difference between the two on the street in terms of driveability?

  • Like 1

I think the SS2 or a OP6 high flow will suit your car better.

Reason is I've found out that your car is a AWD GTS4. By experience not only that they are 12% lake in power to the RWD Skylines, they also run the turbine end hotter. The end result will be more successful with a larger rear housing, that makes the engine much happier too.

Other thing need to be understood is turbocharger isn't magic, making 20psi by 3400rpms requires high exhaust gas velocity in low rpms, which does not satisfy the flow requirement in upper rev range or compensate for high boost. There for most 500HP rated turbochargers kicks in 20psi region around 4000RPMs mark using a larger turbine housing.

Solution on the extreme side is high temperature variable turbine geometry system, heat resistant silicon nitrate ball bearing system and high efficiency compressor wheel (ATR43SS-Alpha system). On this setup we can have 20psi by 3500RPMS, make good power while not chocking the engine. Sadly this turbocharger so far can only work on an externally gated system, complicated to build and expansive.

powerallmarked.jpg

I think the SS2 or a OP6 high flow will suit your car better.

Reason is I've found out that your car is a AWD GTS4. By experience not only that they are 12% lake in power to the RWD Skylines, they also run the turbine end hotter. The end result will be more successful with a larger rear housing, that makes the engine much happier

[[/img]

Is the cost of the op6 highflow the same as the cost of the 2IU highflow? I can't seem to find the 'high flows' on your website?

What's the op6 rated too on e85? Do you have an op6 e85 dyno sheet by any chance please?

Cost to high flow is same.

All the results has been indexed on page one of my high flow thread. Along with many other.

21U result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page__st__7000

Op6 result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-461

Note 4WD systems usually creates a bit more drag, acts very similar to higher dyno ramp. Which usually ends up with better response and less power, probably because the combustion discharging temp is higher under greater load..

  • Like 1

Cost to high flow is same.

All the results has been indexed on page one of my high flow thread. Along with many other.

21U result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page__st__7000

Op6 result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-461

Note 4WD systems usually creates a bit more drag, acts very similar to higher dyno ramp. Which usually ends up with better response and less power, probably because the combustion discharging temp is higher under greater load..

Have you done much testing with the addition of cams regarding boost response?

Can't wait to have an fresh highflow under the bonnet

The cams I used was 264 dur / 9 Tomei from CJmotor, and only CJmotor has them. That was a waste of time and effort, made 3kws of power differences for 400RPMs of lag. For the HP level expected, standard cams works best.

details are at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-452

The cams I used was 264 dur / 9 Tomei from CJmotor, and only CJmotor has them. That was a waste of time and effort, made 3kws of power differences for 400RPMs of lag. For the HP level expected, standard cams works best.

details are at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-452

Jeez.... Glad I spent $700 on tomei 256 poncams.... :/

Unfortunately building turbochargers isn't just about turning lathe, people isn't just buying a turbo, they are buying their desired HP goal. Ensuring the outcome I must not only be an excellent engineer, the engineering must be closely related to the power generating subject which on SAU is a Rb25det motor along with all of its components.

Yes I have a book of dyno sheets contain 1806 pages. that recorded the behavior of a Rb25det in many different aspects, its very useful in directing the shortest path archiving certain performance goals.

I think the issue he was mentioning is with VCT off it fudges the figures a fair bit. You can't say a certain set of cams is no good just because it din't work on your particular setup.

I am of the opinion the stock cams are usually the best option anyway... Upgrading cams is the last thing I would suggest, and only on well sorted high power setups. More important is keeping the gas speeds up.

Yes they will have better low range power because nearly every aftermarket cam shift the powerband slighty up but makes more mid to top power

But with staos car setup it wasn't a fair comparison with stock vs tomei cams as the std had VCt and the tomei didn't

I don't know much about rbs but maybe cause the duration or lift VCt is incompatible but it would be better to compare a smaller aftermarket cam with VCt vs std cam then you can say if it's worth changing cams or not so his test was flawed

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...