Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Our R33 has developed a noise coming from the turbo area. I'm pretty sure I know the answer (turbo stuffed) and the fix, but wanted to make sure there isn't another reason for it before pulling it all apart.

The turbo is stock as far as we know, and the rest of the engine is stock other than a 3" cat-back and an R34 SMIC. The noise is similar to the screaching sound when a drive belt slips, and is there whenever the turbo is boosting. It seems to boost as normal, and power is fine. The noise started during a supersprint event (think track day with official timing) on Sunday, but wasn't really obvious with a helmet on, and suspected a small boost leak. Driving home with helmet off it was clearly not normal.

Anyone have ideas other than the turbo itself?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/441064-r33-gtst-turbo-noise/
Share on other sites

Exhaust manifold gasket could be stuffed, or the T3 flange warped. They can squeal like a stuck pig on boost when the manifold pressure rises...

Try the boost leaks first, and check for shaft play on the turbo while you are there.

Thanks for the replies - have already done a boost leak check & fixed a very small leak from the plug where the carbon cannister used to be connected, other than that there isn't any other leaks.

Will check the gaskets today or tomorrow. How hard is it to get to this area, what needs to be removed, and shortcuts?

Scotty - T3 flange warped - is it likely to be warped on the manifold or the turbo?

if the noise is THAT bad and its still performing as normal then perhaps the turbo is okay

Power is fine - the last few laps on Sunday were the fastest, by over a second per lap. The noise had been there most of the day, but was getting louder as the day went on. It didn't sound so bad with a helmet on.

The T3 gasket could have gone, but usually the turbo flange warps from massive heat and pressure due to track work. Not sure if the weight of the exhaust hanging off it makes it worse... I have seen it a few times on tracked cars running smaller turbo housings.

Either way you will need to check both ends of the turbo to know if it's ok or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...