Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just recently purchased a Blitz i-Colour Spec-R boost controller. I have gone through the installation manual and I'm still a bit confused on how to Install it.

I have a twin turbo set up gt2860r -5.

Now my question is- Would I need to tap in a fitting for the hoses on the compressor hosing on both turbos?

There is a diagram In the manual. The solanoid Unit has a Out/In. (Out) T's off and goes to the valve on both actuators and (In) Looks like its T's off into both compressor housings.

Instead of taking off the turbos and tapping in fittings for the (In) is there another way?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/443426-dual-solanoid-for-gtr/
Share on other sites

You should take the boost signal to the gauge from the inlet manifold.

The line to the waste gates via the solenoid should be done as GTSBoy has said.

As per the diagram the blue line is the pressure source that should go to the new solenoid then waste gates.

Edited by Ben C34

The boost source is the green pipe labeled>

"To bottom of collector, boost source"

The blue pipe simply connects to the induction pipework ahead of the turbo inlets.

Good point . The blue is the return for the bled air back to the engine for emissions requirements. Can't vent anything to the atmosphere!

Note that the first part of this discussion uses the word "plenum" in the sense of the plenum on most cars, not the GTR. The multiple throttles are a complication. So in the above posts the term "inlet manifold" was used. I take that to mean "after the throttles" in the GTR. In any other RB the plenum is after the throttles.

For the purposes of driving a wastegate you want to measure the boost pressure upstream the throttle. If you measure it downstream the throttle then with a partially closed throttle you may have a situation where the pressure in the plenum is much lower than the target boost level but the pressure upstream the throttle is higher. This situation cannot continue indefinitely, but it can exist. At this time the EBC would be trying to close the wastegate to raise the boost (because it's measuring low) but in reality the turbo is pumping more pressure. Because the pressure at the turbo outlet is high but the flow is low (part closed throttle) then you may approach the surge line on the compressor map.

What you actually want is for the EBC to try to maintain the boost that the turbo is making at or less than the max boost you want, rather than allowing the turbo to spin away, effectively uncontrolled.

Now, I acknowledge that a partially closed throttle means that the power output of the engine is under the control of the driver and he is clearly asking for less than max power. It also means that the flow of exhaust gases is being modulated and is therefore less than you would have at WOT. But I think we can all appreciate that under these circumstances you would need a larger proportion of the exhaust flow to go out via the wastegate than the turbine. If the EBC is trying to raise the boost level in the plenum though, then the wastegate will be more closed than needed, meaning more flow through the turbine, meaning more compressor speed. So even with the concept of the driver's ankle being in control, there is a strong possibility of overdriving the turbo relative to what it needs. So we get back to the possibility of surge.

Whether the problem occurs or not may well come down to relative sizing of wastegate to turbine and matching of the exhaust side to the compressor side, which is a lot of variables to play with.

It's all avoided by hooking up the boost signal for the EBC from the turbo outlets.

In a GTR, the plenum is functionally equivalent to the turbo outlet relative to the throttle location, so long as the original throttles are still in use. Single TB conversions are the same as any other RB.

If, in the GTR, the original boost control solenoid is hooked up to the plenum, then that's fine. If it's hooked up to the inlet manifold (which would be the vacuum balance tube underneath) then that opens it all up to the problem I describe above.

Yup, if that connection is to the plenum itself.

In this case though, whilst it will be easier to do that (on the assumption that the standard location is there and available) you'd get better boost control response by keeping all the lines on one side of the engine. Shorter pipes means less pneumatic delay. The original GTR boost control system had to have one pipe go all the way around the engine. But in RB25s and so on, the boost control solenoid was right next to the turbo, for good reason.

FWIW though, the difference won't be terrible and would still work fine.

Instead of tapping fittings on the turbo compressor housing and going through all the trouble of taking out the turbos. I think I might just end up tapping fittings on both of the pipes that leads out from the housing Where all the decompression charge happens. Less parts to take off and easier. Thanks for your inputs.

I recent bought a Greddy Profec Boost Controller and was getting confussed on how to set it up because greddy instructions say to go off the fuel pressure regulator for a signal for the sensor unit. But reading different threads and watching Mighty Car Mods it seems to be a bad practice as you don't want to wreck this signal.

Below I have added my setup which im thinking of doing to my r33 gtr, Just wondering if it would work?

post-120471-0-34691200-1400673227_thumb.jpg

Greddy Setup

post-120471-0-85269500-1400673606_thumb.jpg

Thanks for your input and thanks Fat32gtr and everyone that has put input into this thread so far.

Do not confuse the boost source used for control with the boost source used for display.

The Profec, like most EBCs, is not a closed loop controller. If you look at the installation instructions carefully you will see that the boost signal line they recommend you connect to the FPR signal line is not involved in control at all. it is only the signal that goes to the MAP sensor in the Profec head unit, used for display of boost in the manifold. The actual control boost signal is drawn from the turbo outlet, as shown in their diagram, and the same as instructions given above.

There is very good reason for not tee-ing into the FPR signal line. if nothing goes wrong, then there is no problem. But if you tee in a nice long boost signal hose and it melts or splits or whatever, then you will have a nasty leak in the FPR sense line and your mixtures could go nastily out of control (ie, lean). Not desirable. I think Greddy only recommend that you tee the Profec MAP signal line into there because it is one place that the know will be available on every car that the Profec might get installed into. Saves having to describe a whole bunch of different possibilities for manifold tapping locations.

So for the sensor unit signal to supply the control unit can I tee into the factory boost line that supply the gauges inside the car.

And then in my drawing above not tee into the boost source line which go's from the solenoid to the plenum?

Um....yeah. The GTR is complicated. If you hook the sensor up to the plenum you will never read vacuum, because the vacuum is all on the other side of the throttles. So tee the sensor into the other existing boost gauge lines and you will have a true manifold pressure signal.

And the actuator control signal can come from the plenum but would be better coming from closer to the turbo outlets. Your choice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
×
×
  • Create New...