Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got myself a pair of R33 GTR wheels for my GTST with 245/45/17 on them.

They're snow/winter tyres since they came from Japan.

I like the size since the tyre diameter is 2cm more than the standard 205/55/16

It looks good I find and gives good riding comfort.

(have a lot of potholes and speed bumps here)

In your experience is 245/45 a good choice for your cars or gives 255/40 more control?

http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/tirecalc.php?tires=245-45r17-255-40r17

Edited by Torques

Size won't cause wobbley-ness, probably something wrong with balance or the tyre itself. I like the run the widest tyres possible, but since you have a GTS-t, I'd look at the guard to tyre clearance. Slightly taller sidewall would help with ride, so I'd stick with 245.

Difference between 245 and 255 isn't much, the tyre design/construction/compound would make a bigger difference.

Um. Wat?

20mm extra diameter is not a good thing. Hello speedo error. Hello taller gearing.

For all that.....there's nothing wrong with 245/45 as a tyre size in itself. It is neither going to be much better or much worse than a 255/40 in any real way. You'd be hard pressed to feel the difference in grip, firmness, sidewall flex, traction....anything. The 255 would be the better choice just for being closer to the right size (rolling diameter), that's all.

If you leave them on there 'til they wear out, and you want to go for wider tyres that still retain some of the extra sidewall height, you could probably squeeze a 265/40 onto 9" rims on that car. Gains you a bit extra rubber on the road and half the extra sidewall you have now.

Alright,

Thanks .. I was just thinking since 255 and 40 profile has smaller side-walls it would make a a real world difference

(just by using the link I provided in my first post)

I have the 245 on right now and clearance wise it seems ok

Um. Wat?

20mm extra diameter is not a good thing. Hello speedo error. Hello taller gearing.

For all that.....there's nothing wrong with 245/45 as a tyre size in itself. It is neither going to be much better or much worse than a 255/40 in any real way. You'd be hard pressed to feel the difference in grip, firmness, sidewall flex, traction....anything. The 255 would be the better choice just for being closer to the right size (rolling diameter), that's all.

If you leave them on there 'til they wear out, and you want to go for wider tyres that still retain some of the extra sidewall height, you could probably squeeze a 265/40 onto 9" rims on that car. Gains you a bit extra rubber on the road and half the extra sidewall you have now.

Hi!

Speedo error seems no too bad.

(that's compared to the standard GTSTs)

Look here:

http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/tirecalc.php?tires=205-55r16-245-45r17

And 3% longer gearing seems to be an option,

Here's how it looks at the moment:

post-33912-0-66675300-1402147787_thumb.jpg

Edited by Torques

I run 265's on the back on 9" rim. I'd like to give a comparison to other size tyres but the last time i ran different size tyres they were 32 GTR tires, about 225 wide and rather old. Also car was stock and I ditched them about 4 months after buying the car

If you want to wait till you wear the current tyres out, fair enough. But go the 265's if you wont run into any problems with rubbing. I think mine are 265/35's but cant say 100% and too lazt to walk 4m to the car :)

Also, winter tyres won't be so good in summer eh.

Haha ..

Actually these tyres are very soft and traction is horrible if not scary!

Makes for a good show though ;)

That's why I need to change them but they're okay for getting an idea about sizes / clearance

(since the whole debate)

Edited by Torques

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 4: Hi all. The car drives again! Haven't driven for long, only to store it in the garage again, but the test drive was successful. The coolant and oil leaks seem to be fixed for now. Temps on the engine were also very good, while moving I never even saw 80C water during the approx. 30 minute drive. Ate up all the coolant in the reservoir though so will have to fill that even more when I go to the car next time. One thing that pisses me off is that the RPM gauge is still f**ked, I even resoldered the board twice and used copper paste on the silly screws that are used as connections. Next time I take it out I'll take apart the board and fit new components, I'll see if I can get a replacement IC for it.  I have an appointment set for 22nd of September for the engine tune to 370hp. Alignment also still needs to be done. My hope is that I can get all the legal stuff over with by the end of this season. Anyone of you have advice regarding intercoolers? Currently there is an APEXI core fitted, one of those weird hybrid ones, 600x270x76. I don't think it's bad but it's not new and now I still have the chance to change it now to legally include it in the paperwork. Only issue is that the only options that would arrive in time are a HKS Type R intercooler or generic Ebay spec intercoolers comparable to a JustJap one. Ideally I'd order a Plazmaman but it takes over a month to receive which would mean making the car legal has to wait until next season. Would love to hear some input on this. Same story for my injectors, the previous owner was a nunce and put ID 1050x on the engine. They work but are obviously not ideal at "normal" power levels. But I don't see a reason to change them unless the tuner says it's necessary. I read online before buying a different exhaust that the top secret style rear diffusers won't fit due to the size of the rear resonators. My buddy and I made it work by slightly "adjusting the shape" of the mounting bracket and making some spacers out of 3d print for the mounting bolts. Fits like a charm. Just putting this here in case someone has this problem. Even the hefty HKS Silent Hi Power rear can fits without hitting anything.
    • Well they got my money but they are not getting my gearbox ! 
    • It's needed for rolling idle up, and I think it is a decider on VCT also.
    • I mean, not really. Link ECU's can absolutely still have errors from the ECU thinking it's getting a sensor it's not expecting. I would imagine the speed at the ECU level in Nistune does absolutely nothing anyway? I assume the ECU does not do any fancy TC stuff with regards to front+rear wheel speed or anything of that like anyway. Someone who uses Nistune may be more fluent in it. 
    • Not yet quite as bad as what we've seen a Jim Berry clutch do in an R32 GTR though when it decided to cut a chassis rail in half... Still very very gnarly and a great reason to avoid.
×
×
  • Create New...