Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep. I'd love to see a HTA3582 on a twin cam RB30.

please someone do it with the neo 25 head for high-ish compression, VCT and decent lift cams in stock form.

Killer response combo with massive boostability. maybe mid 400's rwkw on E85? can't say for sure

There would be a power difference but I personally wouldn't go smaller than a HTA3582 on an RB30, remembering that the HTAs spool noticeably better than the GT, the difference between a GT3076R and a HTA3582 on a 3 litre should also not be a huge deal

In the GTX3067 thread it was expected that the compressor wheel being small would spool up fast, but with the 0.82 rear it would seem to be very on par with a GT3076 meaning that the

GT30 turbine has a big say in how things spool. So in the case of a HTA3582 can you be that confident that it would spool that much earlier than a normal GT3582 based on the GTX3067

results?

To go down the HTA35 route It would have to be giving a good push in the seat around 3000rpm to justify the expense over a cheaper GT3076 on a Dedicated street car, being GT35 hotside

with stock manifolds and pistons it would might not be able to justify itself being there as far as its power potential, and a GT3076 RB30 might leave it behind in the short city streets where the 2500-6000rpm is probably the sweet spot?

that's assuming they don't just leave black lines everywhere.

Edited by AngryRB

Ok, on stock manifolds I would possibly look at it differently... I am not sold on expecting to make good use of near 70lb/min turbos like that.

In regards to the GTX3067R results with .82 housing is in almost no way comparable to this, so many levels of different kettle of fish to this comparison.

If you want a general indicator of comparable HTA versus GT on the same turbine, check out 34GeeTeeTees post on the first page of the HTA thread.

I think you need to be serious enough money wise to justify the GT30/35 HTA turbos , at a certain gas speed the standard manifold will become a problem and the larger the engine is the more apparent that would become . Costs would escalate faster with header manifolds and gates and stealth dies a quick death .

Hard to say what size turbo (turbine size) is the limit on the factory manifold . Be interesting to see a 3076HTA and the 0.82 GT30 IW hanging off the standard one .

I think it's impossible to say that the GT30 turbine limits an RB30 because no ones ever tried one in the largest 1.06 IW turbine housing AFAIK . Again back to questionable turbine maps but the GT30 1.06 combination is vaguely similar to the GT35 0.82 combination . I reckon GT35 turbines are fine for driving 82mm compressors and maybe even the GTX76mm one but the GT30 doesn't do too badly on the 76mm GT or HTA compressor wheels .

If Mick o screwed 330 wheel wasps out of his RB25 with a 0.82 GTX3071R we know the stock manifold is at least that good . We don't know what a 1.06 GTX3076R or GT3076HTA would be like with this manifold on an RB30 , it may do even better .

Actually , RB30 would lift the turbo up off the engine mount with the HKS cast RB20/25 manifold . Mmm interesting possibilities and I got me one of them .

A .

PJ's dyno running a GT3076/3037 with HKS 1.06 (from memory) ex hsg on an SR20.

Over 500hp on E85. From memory it set some kind of Australian quarter mile record at the time in that state of tune.

PJGraph.jpg

Edited by juggernaut1

Yeah both Dave and I ran identical power on an RB with the GT3037/3076..... 363rwkw is where they stopped! Same dyno etc... This was with the 0.82 rear housing!

HKS did non gated T25 flanged GT30 turbine housings in 0.61 0.73 0.87 1.01 and I think 1.12 .

I guess this proves that the port through the T25 flange is big enough not to be a greater flow limiter than the volute passage .

The thing is that little flange wouldn't work too well if it had 6 runners merging into it .

Years ago someone in the States had a GT3037 52T in a HKS T25 flanged 0.73 housing and the tubular manifold was quite involved . Being in a FrWd Sentra B13 with an SR20 the manifold had the turbo out over the boxes bell housing and the ext gate was between the merge and the turbine housing inlet .

HKS housings had better formed passages and nozzles than Garrett production ones and looked more like the Tial ones of today .

Also people the "GT35" turbine housings are really machined out GT30 castings , the only GT35 turbine housings I've ever seen were diesel spec ones and they were probably GT40 housings with enough meat to take the smaller 35 wheel . Bitzer - GT3540 .

A .

I recall there was a R33 time attack car that made a change to the 1.06 housing, still on RB25. Can't recall whose thread it is in.

I agree the GT30 1.06 IW combination should do the job on a RB30. Wanted to go down that line with mine. Cost and availability of housings at the time weren't good and other demands of practicality/service dictated that the solution was high mount/external gate and stealth wasn't part of the mix - easy spanner checking of fasteners and easy removal of components was far more important.

With a few horror stories of the GT3582 failing on high boost setups, I think I'd steer to something else if chasing 500rwhp.

With a few horror stories of the GT3582 failing on high boost setups, I think I'd steer to something else if chasing 500rwhp.

Enter the GTX3576 on E85 and GTX3582..... :whistling:

Edited by juggernaut1

Gregs one did ok on his RB28, my old flogged GTX3076 managed 380kw on his auto with a stock engine bay, externally gated .82 Kando housing. Surely there is an easy 450kw in it with the right setup (1.06 rear) in a manual.

I think with the larger housing it would be perfect for a 30.

With a few horror stories of the GT3582 failing on high boost setups, I think I'd steer to something else if chasing 500rwhp.

That's weird eh - then you have 34GeeTeeTee burning around every track day he can with an HTA3076 making 500+whp and not exactly holding back with no issues :wub:

EFR all the things :)

That's weird eh - then you have 34GeeTeeTee burning around every track day he can with an HTA3076 making 500+whp and not exactly holding back with no issues :wub:

EFR all the things :)

All the track days :woot:

Mmm, I've done 6 track days with my Garret pushing 40psi up the straight... Why not flog a turbo hard?

Perhaps we shouldn't be running turbo's at all, I mean it's just another part to fail right?

Mmm, I've done 6 track days with my Garret pushing 40psi up the straight... Why not flog a turbo hard?

Perhaps we shouldn't be running turbo's at all, I mean it's just another part to fail right?

All the pushrods! :woot:

Gregs one did ok on his RB28, my old flogged GTX3076 managed 380kw on his auto with a stock engine bay, externally gated .82 Kando housing. Surely there is an easy 450kw in it with the right setup (1.06 rear) in a manual.

I think with the larger housing it would be perfect for a 30.

One of the Ford boys on Xr6turbo made just under 450rwks with an internal gated GTX3576 (1.06) through a ZF on E85 with just a tune, injectors, cooler and exhaust so the compressor is able to flow that sort of power.

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Fark what are the changes of that snapping like that, clean. Nek minnit, custom radiator goes in, with built in oil cooler like those discontinued PWR ones from yesterdeacades ago
    • I thought I'd do a write up on an auto transmission fluid change for a the nissan 7 speed Automatic. At some stage the genius engineers decided that the fluid in the trans was "for the life of the transmission", (which seems kind of self supporting to me) and removed the dip stick and fill tube (funnily enough there is still a casting for it). Anyway, for this job you do need 2 specialist tools in addition to regular hand tools, jack and good chassis stands. You need a way to pump fluid up to the transmission; I got one of these but there are plenty of other options: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/364584087070 Don't trust the generic listing though, it does not come with the required adapter for the Nissan 7 Speed. You need one of these, can't do the job without it: https://navarapart.com.au/product/genuine-nissan-patrol-y62-d23-np300-navara-re7-dipstick-fill-connector1 You need a heap of compatible transmission oil. Could be Nissan, could be anything else rated for Nissan Matic S. You need at least 10 litres, I had 15 to give it a better flush... Also, you need some biiig oil catch trays, at least one of these, or bigger if possible (volume was fine, size was very marginal): https://autobarn.com.au/ab/Autobarn-Category/Tools-%26-Garage/Specialty-Tools/Oil-Service/Garage-Tough-Oil-Drain-Pan-Black-16L---GT1068/p/TO03191 Finally, a measuring jug is very useful if your pump does not have volumes marked on it, I got a 6l one: https://www.repco.com.au/oils-fluids/fluid-accessories/measuring-jugs/penrite-measuring-jug-6l-pmj006/p/A5322648 Oh, and gloves.....this stuff is horrible (not as bad as diff oil, but getting there) ....First, jack up your car.....
    • So I mentioned the apprentice, @LachyK helped take the bonnet off. We just undid the nuts on the hinges and unclipped the gas struts, then pulled the bonnet back a little as the front was catching on the front bar.  I had a good look at everything today and have removed the rams, repaired/reset the hinges and bolted it back together like it never happened. I'll do a separate write up on the repair, and I also removed the poppers from the Fuga today too to save grief down the road.....as said above it is at least $5k to repair retail. I'm also happier about my ability to prepare a race car, and less happy about Nis-nault's engineering (I can hear @GTSBoy sAfrican Americaning) because the top hose of the radiator didn't slip off.......it snapped clean off. By practice I put the hose clamp hard up against the flare on a neck to make it least likely to ever move (thanks @Neil!). I guess that puts a little more pressure on the end of the pipe as it is further away from the rad, but still, that is pretty shit. I've put it back on for now as there was a fair bit of neck still there, but obviously there is no lip on the neck any more so I don't think I'll track it again until I have a new rad. Speaking of which....more research required. It looks like Koyo makes a standard size radiator in ally which I'll grab in the meantime, but I really want something thicker so might have to go custom in the medium term (ouch) Coolant still needs a refill and I have the pressure tester on it over night, but other than a wash down of the engine bay it seems alright. And @MBS206 noted something noisy on the front of the engine and I think I agree....time for a new accessory belt and tensioners I think.
    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
×
×
  • Create New...