Jump to content
SAU Community

Power Loss On Downshifts, Bouncing Idle And Slight Hesitation At Specific Rev Point -R34Gtt


Recommended Posts

Lookin back at the original thread, some issues on the car HAVE been fixed:

Bouncing/rough idle- new O2 sensor

Stickiness/hesitating @1500-2000rpms- as above

Headlights increasing idle - tighten alternator belt, sand and clean main earth

Dramatic power loss after swapping cas (current problem) - timing, not fully sorted but thats what it is.

DIY Boost leak tester- found/fixed 4 leaks @18-20psi pumped air, minor ones.

Huge power loss during shifts- possible reversion/bov entry not ideal- not worried/last thing on list to fix

Rubbish fuel economy- first fill with new O2 sensor, lets see- also afm is untested- may/may not be f£#ked.

And thats it really

Im glad I do have the controller- learnt a lot of stuff- if it blows then it blows, its not a Porsche, another 3-5k will have an RB25/30 sitting under the hood with a whole lot of lifetime knowledge n experience : win

Something basic for you to read because if you blow something you really wont learn anything.

This is from garrett.

When discussing engine tuning the 'Air/Fuel Ratio' (AFR) is one of the main topics. Proper AFR calibration is critical to performance and durability of the engine and it's components. The AFR defines the ratio of the amount of air consumed by the engine compared to the amount of fuel.

A 'Stoichiometric' AFR has the correct amount of air and fuel to produce a chemically complete combustion event. For gasoline engines, the stoichiometric, A/F ratio is 14.7:1, which means 14.7 parts of air to one part of fuel. The stoichiometric AFR depends on fuel type-- for alcohol it is 6.4:1 and 14.5:1 for diesel.

So what is meant by a rich or lean AFR? A lower AFR number contains less air than the 14.7:1 stoichiometric AFR, therefore it is a richer mixture.

Conversely, a higher AFR number contains more air and therefore it is a leaner mixture.

For Example:

15.0:1 = Lean

14.7:1 = Stoichiometric

13.0:1 = Rich

Leaner AFR results in higher temperatures as the mixture is combusted. Generally, normally-aspirated spark-ignition (SI) gasoline engines produce maximum power just slightly rich of stoichiometric. However, in practice it is kept between 12:1 and 13:1 in order to keep exhaust gas temperatures in check and to account for variances in fuel quality. This is a realistic full-load AFR on a normally-aspirated engine but can be dangerously lean with a highly-boosted engine.

Let's take a closer look. As the air-fuel mixture is ignited by the spark plug, a flame front propagates from the spark plug. The now-burning mixture raises the cylinder pressure and temperature, peaking at some point in the combustion process.

The turbocharger increases the density of the air resulting in a denser mixture. The denser mixture raises the peak cylinder pressure, therefore increasing the probability of knock. As the AFR is leaned out, the temperature of the burning gases increases, which also increases the probability of knock. This is why it is imperative to run richer AFR on a boosted engine at full load. Doing so will reduce the likelihood of knock, and will also keep temperatures under control.

There are actually three ways to reduce the probability of knock at full load on a turbocharged engine: reduce boost, adjust the AFR to richer mixture, and retard ignition timing.

These three parameters need to be optimized together to yield the highest reliable power.

Lookin back at the original thread, some issues on the car HAVE been fixed:

Bouncing/rough idle- new O2 sensor

Stickiness/hesitating @1500-2000rpms- as above

Headlights increasing idle - tighten alternator belt, sand and clean main earth

Dramatic power loss after swapping cas (current problem) - timing, not fully sorted but thats what it is.

DIY Boost leak tester- found/fixed 4 leaks @18-20psi pumped air, minor ones.

Huge power loss during shifts- possible reversion/bov entry not ideal- not worried/last thing on list to fix

Rubbish fuel economy- first fill with new O2 sensor, lets see- also afm is untested- may/may not be f£#ked.

Can be all due to retarded timing

possible reversion/bov entry not ideal- not worried/last thing on list to fix

No, Fix this first before this

Next move- log afrs, get wideband or just go to tuner.

haha. So where on pfc do you need to check to match the base timing - the 2,4,8 channel monitor where the idle always shows as 15 degrees? It also shows as 15 degrees in the settings> ign/inj > ign cor > fin 15 degrees.

http://paulr33.com/powerfc-faq/powerfc-faq.htm#40a

Sounds like you have it sussed , except that you have your cas set to 20 when the power fc thinks it's at 15. Which is a critical problem.

Edited by Ben C34
  • Like 1

Yes I will be taking it down to 15 (with TPS connected as others have said), with 20 it 'looks like' where it was before I took it off.

Yavuz said to set timing as shown on pfc with TPS connected or disconnected doesn't matter - well in my case it does matter by 5 degrees extra with TPS off.

And yeserday the engine dwindled down to a weak cough/ low idle and died after 5 secs of disconnecting the IACV plug haha

The idle cell N02, L02 on my timing map is 19 not 15, is this correct? I know you set base timing from power fc settings but no one has said where exactly - I just set it from the settings>ign/inj>ign map> and the map/fin is usually 15 degrees when warm enough. Assume this is correct.. :S

post-49401-0-76547000-1409128042_thumb.jpg

Does that mean the cas needs to be set to 19 degrees as thats the idle cell on my timing map?

No. It does not. That picture is just the normal timing map yes? And you say that when it is idling you see the PowerFC accessing the N02, L02 cell, yes? Well, what if we told you that even though that cell is highlighted, because the TPS idle is detected, the ECU is NOT making its decisions about fueling and timing from the main maps, but instead is making them from the idle maps?

Now, I must point out that I don't KNOW that PFCs do that. But every other bloody ECU in the world does. The Nissan ECU certainly looks up a separate idle timing map, not the main map.

What the CAS must be set to is what the PFC has been told the CAS is set to, which will be in some other location in the ECU althogether, not on the main timing map. Some basic setup screen.

I'm sure I've already mentioned it you have to set it to what the timing the power fc is putting out.

It's in the monitor settings somewhere. As written in the link I gave you..

No. It does not. That picture is just the normal timing map yes? And you say that when it is idling you see the PowerFC accessing the N02, L02 cell, yes? Well, what if we told you that even though that cell is highlighted, because the TPS idle is detected, the ECU is NOT making its decisions about fueling and timing from the main maps, but instead is making them from the idle maps?

Now, I must point out that I don't KNOW that PFCs do that. But every other bloody ECU in the world does. The Nissan ECU certainly looks up a separate idle timing map, not the main map.

What the CAS must be set to is what the PFC has been told the CAS is set to, which will be in some other location in the ECU althogether, not on the main timing map. Some basic setup screen.

Oh ok thanks Brad - I think it would be in the monitor>channel>idle as Ben said, the reason I asked is because the monitor is exactly that - a 'monitor', not a setting. The idle once warm always shows 15 degrees here.

In the setting menu theres a Ign/Inj (temporary correction) - under this menu > Ignition > Map shows 15 degrees. Under Ign is also a Fin which shows 15 degrees. When u apply the correction the Map shows that correction eg 20 or 10 degrees but the 'Fin' remains at 15. And I assume but dont KNOW this 'Map / Fin' is what the powerfc has been told the cas is set to. Without correction, the map shows 15 degrees AFTER its warmed up.

Edited by rondofj

That's when you have to set the base timing

Once warm and what ever the power fc is showing the timing should be the same at the crank as the tuner told you so it synchronized With the ecu

Otherwise the tuner will be inputting 15degrees or whatever in the ecu to tell it spark then but Infact the spark will be firing at 20degrees or whatever the base timing is set off

I have the power excel software and ill see if i can find an idle map or system.. I know the datalogit can only change the settings that are in the hand controller plus a couple extras.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And one last super random thought, I remember when SAUNSW had a dinner with Alan Heaphy, and another with Fred Gibson there was talk of the R32 GTR cast alloy uprights failing in racing, and one of the things Fred did when they had to add weight to the vehicle was taken the failing alloy uprights, and have them made of steel. Does anyone remember back to 1990/1991/1992 and WHAT was failing in the front hubs/uprights?
    • If you truly want to know how the original failed though, was it a factory defect possibly etc, send it off for investigation. Would probably cost a shit tonne.   The ones that you need to win lotto for, unless you have a good reason for that part to be bolt on, I'd probably roll with getting a few small stitch welds carefully put in place as an extra safety factor once everything is all torqued up tight
    • Are you sure? Because I wouldn't necessarily be. Do we even know the material they've made the new uprights from?   Looking at the fractures in the earlier pics, it does to me look like both a twisting, and levering upward action doing the damage, so you're hoping for both compression, and tension. Depending on the bolts, they can stretch (even high grade bolts will) and now you're hoping for the threads themself not to stretch, as if they do, bye bye mating surfaces holding together, hello bolts now going into shear.
    • Lets say I wanted to buy this, specifically for this purpose. How do I actually perform the function. Can I still buy a Consult-1? Am I about to be burned by the fact my car is a 2000 model Series 2 R34 and thus will be some stupid other system? Do I just need this -> https://obd2australia.com.au/product/nissan-consult-14-pin-to-usb-ddl-diagnostic-interface-with-ftdi-ft232r-chip/ And with what software?
    • That's probably OK. That's a face to face compression joint between two surfaces with the clamping load provided by those bolts. So.... it's unlikely that the bolts will end up feeling that load in shear, unless the clamping surfaces are not large enough, bolts not got enough tension on them, etc etc to prevent the two faces from moving wrt each other. Which... I would hope the designers have considered, seeing as it's probably one of the most important things the upright has to do apart from resist collapsing in its own right. But yes, it would definitely be worth asking them what their safety factor on that part of the design was. I tend to think that the casting, being a casting, is not necessarily the strongest bit of material in the world. It's about an inch square, and when you think about the loads that are being put into it, you have to wonder what safety factor the Nissan boys (and every other OEM engineer who has designed all the millions of other uprights that look essentially the same) used to account for defective casting, aging, severe impacts on the wheel, etc etc. 
×
×
  • Create New...