Jump to content
SAU Community

Power Loss On Downshifts, Bouncing Idle And Slight Hesitation At Specific Rev Point -R34Gtt


Recommended Posts

Ok will try that out, now Im kinda getting why the ABS shouldnt work, because ABS and TCS rely on the same wheel sensors n I've broken that circuit by pulling the TCS fuse? Best be I remove that TCS butterfly and put that fuse back in

Edited by rondofj

They literally have the same ECU as mentioned above.

I'd be checking ABS, mainly cause TC was your issue, and you didn't have (either!) TC light on. So maybe your ABS light is also mysteriously on.

Would have been interesting to see if this whole thread would have happened if the light bulbs were in the dash to begin with, hehe.

Leave the sensors and stuff connected, just remove the plate. When when you can confirm everything is working right, everything is where you need it to be, and you know what's going on with it all... then pull the light out :P

With all this talk of ABS, when I think of it there have been numerous instances during on/startup when all the lights go on, my ABS light takes 1-2,3 seconds longer to go out than the others. TCS/SLIP/HICAS lights never been on at all.

And weird that pulling fuse out doesnt trigger engine light, how would someone know if their fuse is blown n systems not working?

Does anyone know if its possible to just pull off the J Pipe (one that houses the stock BOV) and remove the TCS butterfly with the throttlebody still bolted on? I cant even see the bottom 2 throttlebody bolts with that ugly TCS motor in the way lol

Don't think you could. But you might as well try.

An extension and a socket gets the bottom 2 throttle body bolts very easily.

Took the f$$ker off and the TCS fuse back in- easy 30min job, no need to take off throttle body, just unscrew TCS butterfly from the front after taking off that annoying J pipe. So no TCS butterfly interrupting my performance now due to faulty TCS ECU/wheel sensor? and ABS system now re-enabled with the fuse back in.

The TCS butterfly centre stem has a slot through its middle as you can see, will this impact performance?

post-49401-14305381236837_thumb.jpg

post-49401-14305381394076_thumb.jpgpost-49401-14305381537885_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...