Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As you may know I have the "Gurgles" in the RS4. Probably due to the way the Skylines members instructions said to install the FFP.

Came across info on a "Swirl Pot and Header Tank" Has anyone used one, or knows anything about it?

Edited by 66yostagea
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446753-swirl-pots/
Share on other sites

As you may know I have the "Gurgles" in the RS4. Probably due to the way the Skylines members instructions said to install the FFP.

Came across info on a "Swirl Pot and Header Tank" Has anyone used one, or knows anything about it?

reserv01.gif

Obviously, the swirl pot must be mounted above the head height of the rest of the cooling system to work properly, but the theory is; the coolant draws through the system using convection.

The leg connected to the bottom rad hose draws coolant in and down as it is colder, and this allows a constant inflow from the hot side of the cooling system.

Any bubbles throughout the system will obviously migrate to the highest point over time, and this can then be purged completely and will the draw coolant with no air from the overflow tank; thus eliminating any air pockets within the system.

Convection is a surprisingly effective way to move hot liquids; early cooling systems that didn't have a water pump used convection to provide fluid flow through the system.

As time went by more effective means of cooling were required as more power (thermal energy) was generated and space constraints for radiators and water volume were reduced.

You see many high powered engines (especially RB's) using swirl pots as they generate enough localised heat to flash boil pockets of water within the head; this then causes cavitation if it isn't released.

swirlpot.jpg

An inline swirl chamber is far more effective as it separates the bubbles directly out of the coolant flow from the engine, as opposed to just the bleed points. Obviously this system would still require the use of a header or swirl tank above the level of the head height of the cooling system.

Hope this clears things up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446753-swirl-pots/#findComment-7364465
Share on other sites

I am getting to the point where, after I finish the Dayz rebuild, I will take off the FFP and put the piping back to stock. It is pointless having an RS4 that has to tippy toe around.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446753-swirl-pots/#findComment-7364619
Share on other sites

I am getting to the point where, after I finish the Dayz rebuild, I will take off the FFP and put the piping back to stock. It is pointless having an RS4 that has to tippy toe around.

I realise its hard to photograph the underside of the ffp but if you can put up some pics I will compare it to mine (do you have a Greddy copy?) as I am not having any such problems.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446753-swirl-pots/#findComment-7364894
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Seems like alot of stuffing around for what is essentially an unrequired mod (ffp)

Losing torque, and impacting negatively on the cooling system just to get some tidier pipework.

I said it before, it was a Christmas present from my son. It came with an Xforce cat

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446753-swirl-pots/#findComment-7376859
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

reserv01.gif

Obviously, the swirl pot must be mounted above the head height of the rest of the cooling system to work properly, but the theory is; the coolant draws through the system using convection.

The leg connected to the bottom rad hose draws coolant in and down as it is colder, and this allows a constant inflow from the hot side of the cooling system.

Any bubbles throughout the system will obviously migrate to the highest point over time, and this can then be purged completely and will the draw coolant with no air from the overflow tank; thus eliminating any air pockets within the system.

Convection is a surprisingly effective way to move hot liquids; early cooling systems that didn't have a water pump used convection to provide fluid flow through the system.

As time went by more effective means of cooling were required as more power (thermal energy) was generated and space constraints for radiators and water volume were reduced.

You see many high powered engines (especially RB's) using swirl pots as they generate enough localised heat to flash boil pockets of water within the head; this then causes cavitation if it isn't released.

swirlpot.jpg

An inline swirl chamber is far more effective as it separates the bubbles directly out of the coolant flow from the engine, as opposed to just the bleed points. Obviously this system would still require the use of a header or swirl tank above the level of the head height of the cooling system.

Hope this clears things up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/446753-swirl-pots/#findComment-7388808
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...so a "development" here aswell The swap is "done" and car went "test drive" BUT it seems the clutch(maybe gearbox?) is a little bit sad? I bought this clutch kit https://justjap.com/products/xtreme-heavy-duty-organic-clutch-flywheel-kit-nissan-skyline-r31-r32-r33-push-type "Problem" is that the first gear is hard to put into and it seems that the clutch is not disengaged. It was not the problem with the old clutch...(or like sometime the first gear would not get as easy specialy when the fluid was cold) So? Can it be like...bad "install" or is the clutch wrong ((it should not have been) i done research to get the right one) Or is this "normal" with new clutch and needs to be break in? 
    • @Duncan I can try  and thanks i did not thought about VIN and part numbers for 33/34. @GTSBoy yeah it looks like iam gonna do that  
    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
×
×
  • Create New...