Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hi merv tis mark from banzai, don't bother with changing from r34 n1's to gt-ss. the gt-ss use exact same compressor whell as the r34 n1's. i also think the rear wheel is simialar but not too sure if there exactly the same soz. so yer basiclly the r34 n1's will handle as much boost as hks gt-ss but yer all comes down to the rear exhuast wheel. i beleive max most run in japan on the r34 n1's is 1.6bar but yer don't know when it's efficency runs out as havn't seen a compressor map on this compressor. the compressor wheel of the gt-ss is actually abit smaller than a stock s15bb compressor. same size outer diametre but inner diametre is smaller :S the only reason why these are better than the stock s15bb's are because uses a larger inner diametre rear wheel which flows more gas. any ways just some thoughts. give me a ring melv if u want more info will be happy to help

Mark

Just another couple of model specific versions of the GT28BB . The SR 20 version looks a bit like a GT28RS with a .64ARR turbine housing and a more OEM style compressor and cover - 60mm 60 trim .60 ARR .

The R34 GTR version looks like a Garrett GTBB effort aimed at quick response , the sort of thing Garrett would have used if they had been fitted std .

If I was doing an SR20 it would wear a GT28RS , I've not had the GTR experience but the majority like GT2530's for twins . If I was starting from nothing with a GTR and wanted twins I would use the GT28RS CHRA with the RB26 specific GT2530 housings . The two are nearly identical CHRA wise though the compressor wheel is a slightly smaller trim (62 vs 63) but the exducer tip height is greater and blade form a slightly later design . What it means is a slight reduction in turbine energy to spin it and slightly greater flow potential .

I'm not a huge fan of HKS turbos because the price they charge for basically re hashed Garrett components .

RPS13 Comp 60 trim 60.1 x 46.6mm ARR .60

turbine 76 trim 53.8 x 47mm ARR .64

BNR34 Comp 62 trim 59.41 x 44.46mm ARR .42

Turbine 62 trim 53.85 x 42.4 ARR .64

$64 question that one . My guess would be they wanted a bit more flow potential particularly on the exhaust side at the expense of some lower mid range . You could look at the applications as a 2000cc 4 cyl compared to a 1285cc 3 cyl by two . Thats why the housing AR Ratios and comp/turbines are different .

Cheers A .

$64 question that one . My guess would be they wanted a bit more flow potential particularly on the exhaust side at the expense of some lower mid range . You could look at the applications as a 2000cc 4 cyl compared to a 1285cc 3 cyl by two . Thats why the housing AR Ratios and comp/turbines are different .

Cheers  A .

The GT-SS I saw with the 0.60A/R comp housings were a kit for a GTR.

  • 5 weeks later...

i cant belive this thread is still going thats so cool.

i gave up on the GT-SS. I went much larger turbos in the end. i couldnt justify spending so much $$ on little turbos.

if you want instant power and no lag go the GT-SS or just by a V8 and wack a supercharger on it :)

i cant belive this thread is still going thats so cool.

i gave up on the GT-SS. I went much larger turbos in the end. i couldnt justify spending so much $$ on little turbos.

if you want instant power and no lag go the GT-SS or just by a V8 and wack a supercharger on it :)

They're not that small

GT-SS are fitted! and I am now just awaiting the tomei cams which are hopefully here in oz by now also....

SK how is the JD looking? :(

I missed this post :chairshot

The JD is gooooooooone. :alcoholic

Gary I will be at Oran Park for the racing next weekend (my mate is in the gti again) but no JDs as u didnt place your order!!! morgs got 2 of the WT !!!! :D

oh yeah so when do you want a drive of this thing???

For JD or JB, consider the order permanent. The consumption rate is one bottle per race meeting, that's 17 race meetings per year. The boys need a drink, they aren't camels you know. :alcoholic

There is a separate JD budget, otherwise the natives get restless, what no JD :chairshot

Busy week this week, the transporter is due back from Philip Island late tonight. Unpack tomorrow, dif ratio change, gearbox ratio change, engine swap. New ECU so a quick dyno check that the maps upload OK to the new version. Need to finsih revised cold air intake on the other car and then dyno it. Pack transporter Thursday for Oran Park Friday. The #1 mechanic gets back from China Wednesday, so it could be hectic.

Let's talk at Oran Park, I need to drive it as it has similar mods to our new one.

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...