Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

So I fitted a pair of new Garrett -9 turbos to my R34 GT-R (new genuine gaskets/washers etc) and once I put it all back together & fluids back in I noticed I had coolant leaking from my rear turbo Eye bolt water line. Here a pic of what I mean:

IMG_20140830_00179.jpg

Then I remembered that I had forgotten the special note on the R32 GT-R workshop manual (couldnt find R34 GT-R's but should be the same?) that stated:

Turbo_removal_03.jpg

I only now realised this is to make it easier to fit the eye bolt without damaging the copper crush washers etc. Naturally I'm like FFS! >,<

Anyhoo long story short I got new/genuine copper crush washers and followed the above instruction and re-fitted eye bolt & both washers (easier now that it was loose). Confident that it should be right now I added coolant and bam - its still leaking!! :(

So my question to you guys now is have I f#cked up the threaded connection of the eye bolt to turbo?? Ie - the Eye bolt thread looked fine but Im thinking the mating side?
Confused as to what it could be now :(

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Edited by xanavinismo

If you have both copper washers fitted and have done it up tight enough, and its still leaking, then i would be checking for a crack in the pipe somewhere. copper washers aren't that fragile. are both mating surfaces for the copper washers clean?

Thanks for replies guys, i'll give both mating surfaces a look.

So if it is in fact that one (or both) mating surfaces are damaged, what is the best way of going about 'cleaning' them?

Cheers,

Edited by xanavinismo

if you have a buff gun that is the easiest way to do it. You basically want a nice smooth surface with no gouges/scratches etc

check the steel line doesnt have any cracks as well if I havent already said that

Haha yeah unfortunately I dont have one :( So i'll more then likely have to go the file & honing stone method. Though where can I get these honing stones? Never heard of it =P

And yes i'll also look for any physical cracks on the pipe too when I pull it apart...

Haha yeah unfortunately I dont have one :( So i'll more then likely have to go the file & honing stone method. Though where can I get these honing stones? Never heard of it =P

And yes i'll also look for any physical cracks on the pipe too when I pull it apart...

Any tool shop or probably bunnings. Get a "pocket stone" they are about 60x20x12mmm and are very handy for tidying up faces. Also use full for sharpening knives etc.

Okay kool, will give it a look.

Also is it safe to say that it doesnt take much to damage both mating surfaces? Ie - from trying to force the water line onto the turbo mounting point, & also rubbing against copper washer?

Yeah fair enough man

Okay so heres pics of the water line...
IMG_20140905_00192.jpg IMG_20140905_00194.jpg IMG_20140905_00195.jpg IMG_20140905_00196.jpg

So as you can see rough as hell!

Now heres pics of the mounting point (on turbo side)

IMG_20140905_00184.jpg IMG_20140905_00185.jpg IMG_20140905_00187.jpg IMG_20140905_00191.jpg

Now from what I could see, it doesnt look anywhere near like the water line and could in fact be okay :)

Please let me know what you guys think?

Cheers,

It is very likely that the turbo side is ok. The lines are quite soft.

You can easily file then stone that damage out, or just replace it.

Edited by Ben C34

Depends what file and how good you are with a file doesn't it!

But fair call, a beginner with a bastard file could make a real mess of it.

Edited by Ben C34

The fine side of the sharpening stone will do, just make sure you do it square taking an even amount off all round, to much one side or the other or it will leak

You are doing it up tight enough yeah ?

I'm with Callan on this one, its worth it to get a new one for piece of mind

I am happy to report that its all bolted up now and there are no more leaks! (so far :) )

So yes the filing & pocket stone method has worked!

Thanks so much for the info & help guys!

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...