Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive nearly decided on one of these things. Doesn't look like a type 6 nistune board is likely to be found any time soon.

I have attached a pin diagram which I found on the forum, the installation seems fairly straightforward.

Anyhow I still have a few questions about how it operates:

In terms of controlling ignition, does it intercept the triggering of the ignition from the stock ECU, then delay or advance the signal, or does it have its own ignition maps (it seems possible since it has AFM and RPM signals from the harness).

This seems relevant to maintaining ignition retarding on gear changes, even though the timing might be slightly advanced (ie gear changes are normally 0 degrees, which may be advanced to 5-10 degrees on heavy throttle - still better than no ignition retarding at all)

Are diodes still required? Stories of the emanage burning out coils are old, but still concerning.

Are the injectors handled in a similar way? From reading the literature, my understanding is that it reads the rising edge of a signal from the stock ECU (ie when the injector turns on) then the emanage determines the pulse width. I have read the phrase "adds pulse width", though if my understanding is correct, it could also remove fuel to correct for richness.

Otherwise does it simply bend the AFM signal being sent to the ECU? This seems the least controllable way since the ECU will also vary the timing with the amount of fuel injected.

WGC34_Series_1___STAGEA_RB25DET_Auto_ECU_Pinout_translated.xls

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/448752-s1-stagea-emanage-blue/
Share on other sites

You can subtract fuel with the emanage blue. It supports larger injectors so it must reduce the duration for it to do that. Worst case would be to set the injectors larger than they are to make the duration shorter, then bring the duration back up via the injection map. The maps all add and subtract from the CPU output. If the CPU is outputting a duty cycle of 10% and you add 10%, the new duty cycle will be 11%.

  • Like 1

If you are heading down the Emanage route, I suggest you look at the Emanage Ultimate over the Blue, as the Blue only adds. The latest revisions will be fine, don't buy second hand.

Do you mean the latest revisions will solve the ignition problem?

This seems like quite a major issue, and I can't really find a definite answer to ensure the safety of the coils.

Can you subtract timing though? I am only going by what my tuner told me.

Yes, the earlier emanage ignition output transistors had issues from my research. I would go for a current board revision if possible.

Yes, I'm pretty sure you can subtract timing too, it's been a while since I've played with mine. A lot of the time tuners don't understand how they work, I had a tune once and the guy didn't even adjust the injection map, just played with the AFM output, won't be going back there.

Yes, but it only adds or subtracts from the factory map, which means the tuner needs to leave 4 odd degrees of safety, just incase the stock ecu adds timing. It works well to a point, but you can't really lean on the tune without a standalone.

God this stuff is doing my head in. I might just have to fork out for an adaptronic in the end.

Basically I have a hypergear highflow (with the 21u? exhaust housing), MV shift kit and full 3 inch exhaust sorted. I don't feel like I am getting my money's worth out of the turbo or exhaust, since it feels very sluggish under boost in the mid range.

My main concern about the full standalone (apart from the price, but it costs what it costs) is that there is no timing retard on gear changes, and it will inject and ignite cylinders in pairs rather than individually. That may or may not be a big deal, but I am worried about sacrificing economy or low rpm smoothness. Also when I purchased the shift kit, the guy at MV said that the ignition retarding issue would no longer be a concern. Im sure the shift kit decreases the wear on clutches when shifting, but shifting under full load still seems like a bad thing.

Shifting under full load is the best. ;)

You are correct, the larger turbo will make it drive like crap. Any tuning solution will reel back the lag and increase power, but there are drawbacks with any solution. The EMU will allow the stock ecu to control everything as it does now, this is great for sub 250kw power figures, any more and you will need the standalone imo.

Pairing the injectors isn't a big deal, as long as they are the correct two. Get the order wrong and you will be spraying the fuel onto the back of a closed valve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...