Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am in need of new tyres.

I have a V35 sedan, but came with Coupe 18in rims on it when I bought it. it currently has 245/45 tyres on the rear and 225/45 on the front, which seems to be standard on the Coupe.

I am thinking of going with 245/45 tyres all round. However, I am worried about the fronts touching the guard.

I had to roll the rear guards slightly after fitting 350Z springs and having the rear camber brought back into spec, which kicked the top of the wheel out slightly.

The fronts are fine with 225 tyres, but the camber isn't adjustable, so they have some negative camber with the 350z springs.

Has anyone tried 245/45 tyres on the front of a sedan with 18x8 +30 rims? If so, did you have any issues with them touching the guards?

Edited by sonicii
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/448958-tyres-for-v35-sedan-with-coupe-rims/
Share on other sites

I also have a set of 18inch coupe rims which I use for motor sport with my sedan. Years ago a mate had 245/45r18 all round without any problems. However he like me has std springs and ride height.

Simplest way to tell is to temporarily rotate your wheels front to back for a day and find out. Rims are not identical front to back but are very close. Don't try any fast cornering just some low speed full lock turns to test for touching the guards,

Simplest way to tell is to temporarily rotate your wheels front to back for a day and find out. Rims are not identical front to back but are very close. Don't try any fast cornering just some low speed full lock turns to test for touching the guards,

Good idea.. thanks. Not sure why I didn't think of that!!

Do you know what the difference is with the rims? I have had them both off and the only difference I can find is the stamp 'rear' and 'front' in the casting. they are all 18x8 +30. I just assumed that the stamps were due to the different standard tyre sizes front-rear.

You are correct in that both front and rear rims are stamped 18x8 and +30. So it would seem same size and offset. However they are also stamped front and rear as well making you think there must be some difference.

If you search the topic on G35 driver you can find a few ideas as to what this could be. One guy claims it is just to ensure that "knuckle heads" don't try and rotate the skinnier 225 tires to the rear. Another claims there is some sort of stud/projection on the wheel mounting plate that prevents the rear wheel from being fitted to the front. He claims if you remove the stud it will mount.

I personally can't say I have seen these studs on my rear wheels but haven't as yet tried to fit them to the front. Will try next time I swap my 17inch std rims for the coupe ones.

It is probably just to remind people they are not 'front to rear rotatable' I am guessing, as you also suggested in your last post

Ok, so I swapped the front and rears over and all is fine.. not rubbing under hard cornering, even at full lock.

VDC had a spak with smaller tyres on the rear. It doesn't have a problem with the smaller tyres on the front though, but that isn't really relevant as no-one is going to run smaller rear tyres normally.

Also put the rear and front rims side by side and had a good look at the differences. I found a different shape with the mounting surface as per the pictures below.

But there is nothing on the hubs that prevent either rim fitting anyway. That may be because I have a sedan which normally comes with the same size tyres all round, so there might be something on the coupe that is relevant to these different shapes

post-84647-0-23930900-1411880481_thumb.jpg

post-84647-0-59878700-1411880526_thumb.jpg

Interesting. I had never noticed those differences you point out. Glad to hear they do not rub the guards which is of course what really matters.

All good for your new 245's all round.

Pity you weren't in Brisbane as I have talked Costco into a great discount price on Michelin Pilot Super Sport in that size.

Yeah, that is my next choice... what tyres to go with.. This car is my daily, so I don't need high performance tyres, some decent quality mid-range is what I am after... I currently have KU36s on the front, so the noise from them is driving me insane.. so quite tyres are high on the priority list.

Fair enough if you don't need UHP tyres. For my daily's I also use a Kumho but the KU39's. No where near the noise of the 36's. Not as brilliant in dry grip (few tyres can keep pace with the KU36 in the dry) but a better all-rounder. Considerably better in the wet and better mileage. There are many good brands around, just depends on what you can get locally and for what dollars.

Good luck.

I've read that KU39 aren't as good as the old KU31. That was enough for me to try other brands (Falken FK452, Dunlop SP Sport Maxx; cheap via Tempe Tyres).

The Michelins would be the bomb though. Perhaps the PS3?

Dunno if the PS3's are normally this price but I got a set of x4 for our daily in 215 45 17 for $636 ($159ea) fitted just recently.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...