Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im going to be installing an adaptronic 440 in my s1 stagea soon. One aspect which Ive been thinking about is controlling a few functions of the auto, ie, sending the ECU a modified TPS signal, and also controlling the line pressure solenoid.

Does anybody have any literature on how the pressure solenoid functions? When the duty cycle applied to the solenoid is higher, it bleeds off more pressure?

To err on the side of caution, I would like to ensure the line pressure is at least slightly higher than stock at lower rpms to cope with the increase in torque. Also, if the standard ECU is receiving a modified TPS signal, it may also reduce line pressure based on that variable.

Has anybody seen or made measurements about when and how much line pressure is reduced?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/451102-piggybacking-an-auto/
Share on other sites

Not for the re4, but I have worked extensively on the re5. Sounds like you need to get your hands on the RE4 workshop manual.

Have you seen the programmable PCS auto controllers? Will crap all over what you plan to do with the Adaptronic.

Indeed it would, but to be honest I am not really willing to spend too much more time and money on this vehicle. The auto behaviour has some annoying aspects, but it isn't the end of the world. Im hoping a slightly skewed (to a lower voltage) TPS signal at low throttle openings will allow me to use some more throttle without kickdown as well as keep the torque converter clutch locked up. My biggest concern is the ECU reducing line pressure in those situations.

I might even be able to make a rudimentary timing retard feature (on gear changes) with the assistance of a programmable microcontroller.

  • 2 weeks later...

Should be no need to make a timing retard feature as the stock ecu should carry out its normal functions if the adaptronic is in fact piggybacked on.

Maybe Im getting my terms mixed up. The 440 will be controlling fuel and timing, so it won't incorporate the timing retard feature from the stock ECU.

Which brings me to something interesting. Ive been looking through consult logs of the stock ECU, and it seems the timing retard feature only occurs under heavy acceleration. I found periods of around 100-200ms where the timing was reduced to between -1 and 3 degrees at gear change points.

However under regular partial throttle driving I couldn't find any similar timing cuts at gear changes.

For a while I was quite worried about losing the gearchange timing feature. It will be interesting to see if the evidence in the logs mean that losing the timing retardation is inconsequential for regular day to day driving.

Why would it matter? I have been driving with no timing retard on gearchange for 5 years, and I am still surprised how nice it drives.

I spent a bit of time reading SAU threads on people running auto skylines with PFC or other units which lose the timing retard feature. Judging by the responses, you'd think it was like running liquid glass in your transmission.

On stock boxes? You would want a shift kit at least.

If the PFC puts the auto in limp mode, different story. The line pressure will spike and the box will shift hard. You need to keep it happy of course.

Just quickly looking into it, the pfc isn't designed for auto cars, so it's like putting a PS2000 standalone in there.

You need to keep the stock ecu in place and intercept the engine sensors while replacing the outputs and keeping everything happy (no codes). If you have issues with this you would be best trying to find a decent tuner with an electronics background to help. I could give you the name of two in Melbourne...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually everyone on the roads was really well behaved. The only person that did any minor tailgating was a local hoon in a Turbo Focus. Unfortunately we weren't going the same way so there was no grand initial D touge battle. Lots of people pulled over and let me through. The amount of "Hey man nice car, omg skyline, nice 34 man woo" was suprising. Like really suprising. Like almost annoying. My partner was obviously surprised, she'd never seen anyone in the real world point out the car/like the car/want to chat about the car before, so to have like 3 people per day mention it was notable, I could finally say SEE? SOMEONE THINKS THEY'RE COOL. Everyone was also pretty suprised about the weather. Every day was dry and about ~13-14C. Mount Wellington had a sign that said they close the gates at 9pm and I was heading up there at about ~7:30. It was VERY apparent that conditions were getting significantly worse by the minute on the way up and down. The road on the mountain was terrible though, it's no driving road. I have various suspension related questions now. Luckily it was only about 20 minutes from where we were staying to the top of the mountain as said Google maps. We only had the 2 nights in Hobart. We went to the Farm Gate Market though which was really good - And went down to the Hastings Thermal springs/caves down there during the day. I'd definitely be up for going back again, so luckily there's a few more sights yet to see. Didn't get to do the west coast/queenstown/cradle mountain so this was supposed to be a 'scouting' trip anyway of sorts if I were to one day do/take part in/organize a more car-focused trip. As for the boat, it wasn't bad. Well it was bad, but not in the way you're thinking. We did the night trip which leaves at 6:45 (though you have to be there ~2 hours earlier) and arrives the next morning at about 6am. There is nothing to do on the ship. If you plan accordingly and bring a book/tablet/show to watch/charger you can just chill out, take some Travacalm and just sleep through it. The food there is an extremely basic buffet that costs $32 a plate, or $14 for a $3 pizza. The way back we had a travel kettle and a few different types of cup noodles and made our own tea/coffee in the room. This was a far superior way to do it. At the very least book one of the rooms with beds. I guess as we were in the off season we didn't have room mates. You get an option for rooms with 4 beds (2x bunks) or a room with just the two bottom beds. There's also some option for a deluxe queen bed but it's much pricer. We've been on sleeper trains in Asia before so we figured this is similar (and it was)
    • You just gotta be really, really, really clear and decisive with what you want your end product to be. 99% of people who want this conversion aren't "I want to run a 295 front tyre!" so they don't really need the widebody. They just want the OEM body to look a little less dumpy, so bonnet, bar, skirts job done with some camber, stretch, slam. It's when you want that, but then decide to pivot later you get big problems. See also if you're willing to get an all in one fibreglass bar, and you're willing to accept fibreglass problems like cracking the entire item on a driveway, instead of just a piece attached to the bottom, etc etc etc. Decide this all before buyin'.
    • After @Kinkstaah debacle, I'd never want to try and get it right 😛
    • The hood lines up with the fenders. The front bar doesn't perfectly line up with the fenders where the wheel arch is. You have to 'squeeze' the front bar 'in' as it wants to naturally flare out and be longer on the sides. There's a few threads where people notice this when they only swap a GTR style bumper and front bar. Unless you have genuine OEM items - you may be better served getting conversion kits. There are GTT bumpers to fit GTR hoods. There are GTR hoods (non genuine) to fit the GTT bracketry. MAY  
×
×
  • Create New...