Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im going to be installing an adaptronic 440 in my s1 stagea soon. One aspect which Ive been thinking about is controlling a few functions of the auto, ie, sending the ECU a modified TPS signal, and also controlling the line pressure solenoid.

Does anybody have any literature on how the pressure solenoid functions? When the duty cycle applied to the solenoid is higher, it bleeds off more pressure?

To err on the side of caution, I would like to ensure the line pressure is at least slightly higher than stock at lower rpms to cope with the increase in torque. Also, if the standard ECU is receiving a modified TPS signal, it may also reduce line pressure based on that variable.

Has anybody seen or made measurements about when and how much line pressure is reduced?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/451102-piggybacking-an-auto/
Share on other sites

Not for the re4, but I have worked extensively on the re5. Sounds like you need to get your hands on the RE4 workshop manual.

Have you seen the programmable PCS auto controllers? Will crap all over what you plan to do with the Adaptronic.

Indeed it would, but to be honest I am not really willing to spend too much more time and money on this vehicle. The auto behaviour has some annoying aspects, but it isn't the end of the world. Im hoping a slightly skewed (to a lower voltage) TPS signal at low throttle openings will allow me to use some more throttle without kickdown as well as keep the torque converter clutch locked up. My biggest concern is the ECU reducing line pressure in those situations.

I might even be able to make a rudimentary timing retard feature (on gear changes) with the assistance of a programmable microcontroller.

  • 2 weeks later...

Should be no need to make a timing retard feature as the stock ecu should carry out its normal functions if the adaptronic is in fact piggybacked on.

Maybe Im getting my terms mixed up. The 440 will be controlling fuel and timing, so it won't incorporate the timing retard feature from the stock ECU.

Which brings me to something interesting. Ive been looking through consult logs of the stock ECU, and it seems the timing retard feature only occurs under heavy acceleration. I found periods of around 100-200ms where the timing was reduced to between -1 and 3 degrees at gear change points.

However under regular partial throttle driving I couldn't find any similar timing cuts at gear changes.

For a while I was quite worried about losing the gearchange timing feature. It will be interesting to see if the evidence in the logs mean that losing the timing retardation is inconsequential for regular day to day driving.

Why would it matter? I have been driving with no timing retard on gearchange for 5 years, and I am still surprised how nice it drives.

I spent a bit of time reading SAU threads on people running auto skylines with PFC or other units which lose the timing retard feature. Judging by the responses, you'd think it was like running liquid glass in your transmission.

On stock boxes? You would want a shift kit at least.

If the PFC puts the auto in limp mode, different story. The line pressure will spike and the box will shift hard. You need to keep it happy of course.

Just quickly looking into it, the pfc isn't designed for auto cars, so it's like putting a PS2000 standalone in there.

You need to keep the stock ecu in place and intercept the engine sensors while replacing the outputs and keeping everything happy (no codes). If you have issues with this you would be best trying to find a decent tuner with an electronics background to help. I could give you the name of two in Melbourne...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...