Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I need some advice, what do you reckon I should get first?

Which will give me more bang for my buck at this stage?

FMIC (can't really afford atm), boost controller, dump, front pipe, or dump and front pipe?

I've currently got a 3.5 inch HKS exhaust from the cat back, and pod filter.

wil..

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yepp, get the rest of the exhaust done first.

Dump/front pipe and a high flow cat. Dump/front pipe all-in-one will be about $300, highflow 3 inch cat about $200. Put them on yourself to save some bucks.

Then maybe a high flow panel filter (unless you already have one), or a cold air box for your pod (if you have one).

Then get a 'good' bleed valve to up the boost.

Then save some bucks for a FMIC or adj cam gear :P

J

Thanks guys.

So you reckon that getting the front half of the exhaust done will be the best bang for my buck?

Would I feel the gains more than if I just got an electronic boost controller installed and up'd the boost to 10psi?

Hi Wilch, an Autospeed style boost controller (Norgren valve based) for $100 and a Power FC ($900) would be my next choice, nothing else will give the same result (+30 rwkw). You are going to need it soon anyway to get rid of the over boost protection, 180 kph speed limit, rich A/F ratios and retarded timing and all the other things that stop the other mods making the power that they can.

My 20 cents worth, hope it helps :(

Cheers guys :rant:

I'm leaning towards a boost controller first at the moment. Getting rid of the dual stage 5psi/7psi@4500rpm thing should beef up the midrange noticeably for the moment.

Then I'll get the dump/front done, and get the computer when I get the FMIC (so i only have to get it tuned once).

wil..

If you get a front mount and dump pipe the boost goes up a bit any way. to about 9 psi,

You dont want to have high inlet temps so i'd surgest a front mount to keep the temperatures cool before boosting. Also theirs no point forcing more air (by more boost) into your motor if it carnt breath properly. - (dump pipe and front mount)

why not just run 10psi all the time

Would that be "safe"?

have 10psi as the low and 12psi as the high or something?

I was thinking 7psi because I thought it'd be more "fuel efficient" (I know, I know... silly and stuff).

I should be getting the dump+front within the 2 weeks after getting the boost controller. Then an FMIC and computer a month after that.

wil..

A decent high flow cat and cat back, you should be pushing 9psi without a bleed or EBC.

Management - get everything running well, and smoothly

FMIC - cool the intake charge down THEN turn up the boost, around 12 psi is nice and safe - should see around 200rwkw.

Just be aware, when you fit the FMIC, you may need a new clutch, I did.

My 0.02c incl

whats the go with FMIC for mildly modded r33s?

ive got exhaust, dump pipe and boosted at 11psi

dont want to go overboard with mods, so what size fmic should i be looking at?

im thinking of getting an R33 gtr one? that a good size?

if not, what is a good size?

with a full turbo back exhaust, hi-flow cat and FMIC I run about 8psi (0.55 kg/cm^2)

I would suggest completing your exhaust first before anything...

a FMIC is almost useless, unless you can raise the boost with a decent amount of air flow. To save money on a boost controller for now, there is a thread here that explains how to switch you standard solenoid to run in high boost mode all the time.

Once you have invested in a good pneumatic valve setup (the norgren valve in this and then this articles, that Sydneykid mentioned), you should then move on to a better intercooler. (I use the norgren valve setup myself -including the check valve in part 2, and it works rather well for me)

Your next step would then be aftermarket management, or a SAFC to lean out your mixtures to a flat 12:1 A/F ratio. Getting aftermarket management once you have done all these mods, will save you cash on tuning, as you do it once rather than after every mod.

Keep in mind, that you wont see a big gain after every mod, until you go the aftermarket management. The standard ECU will richen fuel mixtures and retard timing when you start running more boost as a safety measure and rob you of power.

That's the most cosst effective approach I can think of for basic mods, and it is the path I took after reading many users posts about their experiences.

if you are just looking for a once-off upgrade for that little bit more power than some ECU tuning/aftermarket management would be a good option.

however...

once you are bitten by the modification bug you won't want to stop there :)

i agree with Zahos in that if you have a desired path that you wish to take with your modifications (ie exhaust/fmic/boost) that you seem to have expressed in your posts, then do all the 'bolt-on' mods first and than once its all finished get the management (ECU) organised. saves on tuning as you only have to get it done once rather than after each time you do a mod.

my order from stock skyline to mild beast would be:

- dump/front pipe

- high-flow panel filter + cold-air intake

- cat-back exhaust

- bleed valve (12psi on R32 or 10psi on R33)

- GTR camshafts (great cheap upgrade on rb20 but not sure of rb25)

- ECU retune / aftermarkt management

then if you decide that your pockets are real deep then the next set of upgrades aren't going to be cheap and the cost of a re-tune will be insignificant compared to the cost of the mod / fitting so can be justified...

good luck with it all

Waz.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...