Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys ..

few weeks ago i asked for some help and got some good response from some ppl here. just wanted to show you guys my results..

so the set up is rather simple..

fuel :am using a aermotive stealth pump with some dw800cc injectors

ignition: stock

engine: arp head bolts , wiseco piston stock compression,extended sump and harden oil pump gears and stock everything else..

extra: am also using a aem water injection kit..actually just using filtered rain water to aid our crappy 91 ron fuel ...

management : haltech plug and play

tuned by me :)

15 psi :336trq & 414whp

21 psi :409trq & 499whp

from the dyno graph i thought this would been lagy ..but i was so wrong ....car pulls and spools just as good as my old precision 6262 bb .makes more power at same boost. at 11 psi with the old 6262 i was making around 340hp & with the 8375 11psi car made around 370hp both without water injection

honestly very impressed for a turbo i paid 580us for compared to the 6262 which cost 1200us..

and all of this was done with a single scroll 8375 and a ebay single scroll $140us manifold..... may be i got lucky with manifold but its just as strong as the one i paid 400us for before.have put countless abuse on it and no cracks yet.

dyno graph and vid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfhW7fvX-Bg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452309-rb26-borgwarner-8375/
Share on other sites

No doubt they are an awesome turbo for the price, I would love to see a back to back against the precision. These things spool like a beast and there's plenty more in that turbo for you if you put the money in the right gear.

I've been running mine with the full race twin scroll manifold and made 560rw hp on ethenol with a 2.6. Made 500rwhp at 5500rpm

I've since upgraded the cams and valve train, cleaned up the head, raised compression, stroked to a 2.9 and ceramic coated the exhaust side .. Results should be up within the month

Old graph.. Rubbish photo but its 98 premium vs E85

Note the car made no more power past 50/50 ethenol/98

post-47556-0-70740500-1420352595_thumb.jpg

No doubt they are an awesome turbo for the price, I would love to see a back to back against the precision. These things spool like a beast and there's plenty more in that turbo for you if you put the money in the right gear.

I've been running mine with the full race twin scroll manifold and made 560rw hp on ethenol with a 2.6. Made 500rwhp at 5500rpm

I've since upgraded the cams and valve train, cleaned up the head, raised compression, stroked to a 2.9 and ceramic coated the exhaust side .. Results should be up within the month

Old graph.. Rubbish photo but its 98 premium vs E85

Note the car made no more power past 50/50 ethenol/98

yep they do spool super fast for journal bearing turbos..... i was really worried when i first compared it to a physical size of a 6262 .

as you can see in the vid the moto sits in a s15 silvia which is super light ...the weight difference of a r33 at 3400lbs and the s15 2700lbs makes this car feels like its almost at 650hp...

with some cams and cam gears i should be able to get power in a tad quicker and make a higher peak hp...

looking forward to seeing your updated build results...

yep... but the results with the 6262 would not be applicable to compare because it was done with out water injection ..so the timing when tuning was alot different .but the 6262 did make 415whp at 20 psi where as the 8375 made 499hp at the same boost... but the 6262 was only running on a .63 housing which would make high hp numbers on such a big moto difficult .

i had read some where a guy changed out his .82 ar 6262 for a .63 and the results were minimal difference on his rb26..but i cant confirm that........i know on a 2.0 honda moto moving from .63 to .82 makes no difference ..

only results i have with both turbo is at 11psi without water spraying either ways and the 8375 did make more power then....

Ok thanks mate, would be good to see some more results on this turbo going around.. This night spark a bit more interest

Here is my thread on my results if you are interested

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/414766-gtr-joeys-r32-gtr-e-flex-twinscroll-8375-results/

hey.. i used a .88ar back end because i was worried about lag as the turbo was non bb..

your dyno graph is a lil unfair comparison as the bigger ar back ends has 5psi difference .it may not look like much but once these turbo begin to spool the move from 7psi to 21psi in a heart beat... that may contribute to more power lower in the power band..

the twin scroll will help with spool up when combined with a twin manifold..

what moto are these graph from?

  • 9 months later...

Here is my graph on a 6262 by with .84 TS setup and 93 octane gas

611 at 19 psi

550 at 15 psi

I think if I had 9:1 Cr pistons my torque would've been a lot higher

I'm using JE 8:3:1 CR pistons and Tomei 264 cams.

EC990DBB-75E3-4453-89C1-EC9B0C5E4339_zps

Edited by silvianc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...