Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive just rebuilt a 25/30 with bearings and rings ( no oversize, all stock parts)

im just wondering what the best method is for runnign the motor in, ive read that starting with higher rpm cycles, letting it cool and then doing lower rpm cycles is the reccomended method.
The hastings box was kinda vague with " accel from 30mph to 55mph"

I was hoping some guys on here with real time exp could help out.

Cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452984-running-in-rb3025/
Share on other sites

Minimal idling to start with and as much load as you can (without being too silly) is crucial, I've had some engines that are bedded in within 10 mins of running/revving and others take some driving, guess it comes down to bore finish, rings, oil etc.

First start is very crucial, once you're satisfied with oil pressure bring the revs up, 2000rpm idle is fine (and necessary with new cams), keep water topped up and gradually give it some revs as it comes up to temp, if you think you have air in the cooling system shut it off before it boils.

Once you're on the road drive it normally for a street car, not abusive but use all of the rev range and as much load (boost) as you can depending on tune.

And always use mineral oil until its bedded in (good compression/no blowby).

That's all I can think of at the moment :)

Edited by DanielH

Provided that your oil is up to it, there's no harm in running an engine like this in HARD, if its gonna be abused it may aswell do it from day 1, some people may disagree with that though, but the only items to "run in" are rings and cams/lifters, and rings bed in by high load/pressure forcing the rings out, cams are straight forward, if using old cams no need to worry!

You need some load to bed in the rings, start light loads, keep the revs to under half of redline at the start, decelerate to pull the metal off the walls after accelerating, gradually building power as you go along progressivly, drop the oil after 10-15 minutes and repeat the load cycles.

Dont baby it, dont wring its neck at the start, drive it normally with load on it, its the load that forces the rings against the walls to bed them in, its the decel that pulls the crap off the walls.

Also remember that fresh walls are the roughest, the most heat and wear happens in the first few minutes so you dont want too much load for th first few minutes as it will create a lot of heat due to friction.

Cheers guys this helps a lot, I'm using purpose run in oil that penrite sells, how many ks should I do before I take it back to the dyno?

And I suppose once it gains compression across all cyls is when you tell its bed in.

Reads 150 across all 6... Apart from cyl 3 which reads zero. But after a leakdown test the exhaust valves arnt sealing ( lifters arefresh so no oil in them yet either)

150 is pretty good already if it hasnt been run/or run much.

I'd go easy with the Penrite running in oil as I find its pretty thin when its hot, it's great stuff but I wouldn't give the motor too hard a time with it in there, that's just my preference though.

My preference would be running in oil for initial start up, and then maybe 500-1000 K's or so of fairly sensible driving after the first service, then I would switch to a high performance mineral and take it to get tuned and then go to whatever oil you plan to run it on.

No, each cool down on the dyno is about 15 minutes. You do a few pulls with decent (not massive, just decent) load and revs, then allow the dyno fan to cool the engine back down.

You should only need <10 dyno pulls like that, separated by cool downs to bed the rings. Similar number of pulls on the road.

One of the main things to avoid is to spend much time at constant and light loads for the first hour or more of running it. You really need to give the engine constantly varying load and speeds between light and moderately heavy/fast. This is far more important before the rings have bedded, but still important even after those first few run ups.

  • 2 weeks later...

Right so ive attempted runnign the motor in,
FIrst drive - 2nd/ 3rd gear going from 2k to 5-6K rpm, letting it decel all the way to 2 k again. did that 10 times roughly then let it cool.
same again with the second drive ~~

Comp tested it as soon as i had it back in the garage and got 140 across all 1-5. battery died at 6 and only showed 120~ but thats understandable.
will comp test again when the engine is cold.

Now that its had about 15-20 min of driving with that penrite run in oil, should i drop it and put some mineral oil in and do abit more driving like above?

Drop the oil certainly. But you could consider doing a 1000 kays on another batch of run in oil. The main thing with run in oil is not so much that it's mineral rather than synth. It's more so that it contains a lot of detergents and whatnot for helping to clean up the crumbs and blobs of foreign material generated by assembly and the running in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...