Jump to content
SAU Community

<500cc Side Feed Injectors - Rb25 Neo


Recommended Posts

Oh really? I thought all 25's were side feed. I better have a look then :S Is there any real way to tell, will the injectors be litterly flat to the block if its a side feed?
Thanks fellaz.

I've gone from SR to RB and I know almost nothing about them yet :unsure:

Edited by Linnertson
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453996--/#findComment-7482755
Share on other sites

It's very easy to tell. On side feed rails the injector heads protrude past the rail and are retained with caps. On the top-feed rail of the Neo the injectors are retained by the rail i.e. the rail is the highest point.

The SR uses a side feed rail and it looks similar to non-Neo RB25's.

Edited by colourclassic
  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453996--/#findComment-7482907
Share on other sites

I checked just then and yep, looks like a top feed. I understand now because I know my old SR had the caps so that makes sence, thanks guys all this knowledge helps :)
I dont really plan to run E85 tbh, just because theres no one that close I would fill up on in the north shore (and I do weekly trips to newcastle).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453996--/#findComment-7483403
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...