Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am putting my engine together this weekend and just discovered a clearance issue with the oil squirters and the bottom of the pistons.

The crank is BC 79mm stroker (2.75L on std bores) and I have a brand new N1 block. The pistons are CP that came with the stroker kit and as you can see from pictures the bottoms of the pistons do not look relieved in the correct location nor are they deep enough for the stroke of the crank. The piston hangs up with approx 15 deg of rotation until BDC each way.

Deck extension at TDC look like they are def stroker pistons so the wrist pin location is correct, just not relieved on the bottom.

Has anyone seen this with this setup? Perhaps they just cut the bottom for the wrong stroke? They also look like they mossed the location relative to the piston by about 10-20 deg.

I have a call in to CP Carillo but I was curious if any builders have seen this?

post-136202-0-00060800-1426434741_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-86102600-1426434767_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-15949000-1426434788_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-54147100-1426434796_thumb.jpg

Well I decided to relieve the pistons. I can't wait another 2 months on this project. Took some measurements and cut the Pistons. I got my scale out and sanded them until they all weighed the same too. Very very little change to overall weight and I would say it's negligible. bottom end is together.

post-136202-0-52803700-1426474381_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-27293700-1426474401_thumb.jpg

Still looks a bit shallow to the eye but it cannot be judged from a picture.

Did you take a measurement of the gap to the squiters?

How much room did you allow? More than 1.5mm-2mm?

I used a bit of modeling clay on the skirt of the piston and ran them down. Yes I have about 1mm clearance. I wanted to be able to lose a rod bearing and not break a squirter off.

Thanks for the replies. I was worried that I was the only one and maybe they sent the wrong pistons.

Patrick

modeling clay showed me where to cut. Then I made several cuts on the first one and kept checking. Once I got that one done, I measured from top of piston with calipers and cut the rest. It was directly inline with one of the oiling holes for the rings, so alignment was easy. I still think I barely missed the angle, but they all have adequate clearance.

Plus the rods grow when they get hot, and yes the piston grows down on the skirt, but only from the wrist-pin down. I can run calcs, but I'm betting nothing will touch.

Patrick.

Edited by HarrisRacing

Oh and they are cut at an angle about 20 deg from horizontal plunging in from the outside to the inside. This is why they look shallow. They follow the angle of the squirters.

I have the same kit in my RB25Neo.

Can confirm you need to do something about the squirters. I'm no engine builder but I believe they came to the same conclusion you did, and modded the pistons with a relief.

The previous engine builder opted to just remove the squirters.

:/

40 thou may not be enough.

Firstly when checking with modeling clay, remember your pushing the piston over (rocking it over) with the clay, where as you really should be rocking it the other way into the squirter for the true minimum possible.

Then allow for bore and piston wear which will let it rock over further.

Id be aiming for a minimum of 80 thou (2mm) +.

You also have the option of putting washers under the squirters should you need a little more if its already assembled.......not too much as remember they are positioned by the pin holes.

Just remember more clearance is better than less.

From memory stock pistons have quite a large cutout to clear the squirters so dont be scared to take out more than you need.

I have the same kit in my RB25Neo.

Can confirm you need to do something about the squirters. I'm no engine builder but I believe they came to the same conclusion you did, and modded the pistons with a relief.

The previous engine builder opted to just remove the squirters.

:/

That's because you don't need them with Forged Pistons like you do with Cast.

That's because you don't need them with Forged Pistons like you do with Cast.

That is what the first builders said

wat

This is what the second builders said

Well you got me paranoid so I added some copper crush washers under the squirters today. Just that extra bit of insurance.

Note for future builders , clearance more than my pictures just in case

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...

FYI you shouldn't have to worry about this any longer. I called CP and they are opening discussions with BC about these pistons. Said they totally see the crash after comparing them with other RB26dett custom pistons and considering stroke looks like it was overlooked somewhere somehow.

You're welcome whoever you are...

And for the record. The BC stroker 8.5:1 CR pistons with valve reliefs are 15.77cc of added dome...Need to take that into account if cutting head, running thin head gasket, etc. I think it's about 8.62:1 if running stock bores on a 1mm thick head gasket, and stock 70cc's in the head.

Patrick

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...