Jump to content
SAU Community

Tachometer Fix


Recommended Posts

For those of you frustrated with their tachometer that doesn't work, this may be a solution. I set about building a completely new and independent tachometer driver. This isnt a tutorial, just giving people ideas. If youre not confident in making a circuit and troubleshooting it afterwards, best skip this.

You'll need to grab yourself a CS8190 integrated circuit. They come in a 20 pin and 16 pin configuration. I would recommend the 16 pin one, as it can be mounted into an IC socket. At the time only the 20 pin was available to me and it was a pain to manually solder the very small pins. Theres plenty on ebay.

Other than that you'll need to pick up all the components listed in the PDF circuit diagrams.

After all the shopping was done, it was simply a matter of mounting the circuit board to the back of the cluster, as seen in the pictures.

Disclaimer: So far I have only used this with an aftermarket ECU, as the tacho output on my standard ECU doesn't work. However, the tacho works using a ground switching signal, and so the stock ECU should work.

Tip 1: I also have the ATTESA ecu connected to the tacho signal. If you are using this tacho on a 4WD application, putting a diode between the ATTESA and ecu reduced jitter in the tacho.

Tip 2: I subsequently made a remote mounted trimpot that I can reach under the dash without having to dismantle everything just so I can make adjustments to the tacho. The instructions list a 250k trimpot, however it is too sensitive. The target resistance is around 150k ohms. This can be achieved with a 100k resistor in series with a 100k trimpot, and will give you finer control. Perhaps even 125k resistor with a 50k trimpot.

Finally I have the accuracy in an acceptable range. While it is accurate to about 3000rpm, it gradually reads too fast. 7000rpm on the tacho equates to about 6500rpm engine speed. You can change this with the trimpot, but you will have to choose your accurate range. If it is accurate at high rpms, it will read too low at low rpms.

CS8190-D.PDF

datasheet cs8190.pdf

post-46287-0-09583000-1427284634_thumb.jpg

post-46287-0-75663000-1427284655_thumb.jpg

post-46287-0-48757700-1427284671_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...