Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello,

I have a R33 GTST with nistune z32 conversion in it and am having problems with getting anything more then 9 AFR. I have verified my wide band is good by reconnecting the narrow and both read the same perameters. In nistune i was told a simple change in the k constant should do the trick and even had them send me a base tune for z32 maf and 740cc nismo injectors and still it runs the same. Im at a loss went to the only tuner out here and they dont want to do nistune as he has never done it before. car ran fine before the nistune and other add ons. I will add what has been done. When the car runs it gets to about 12-13AFR on load and on full boost it will go down to 9 but just sitting it runs so rich and smells strong and even a little gas comes out now my oil is saturated with alot of fuel so i will be changing that as well. I know i read that i shouldnt need a FPR so any help would be great.

R33 GTST series 1

Blits front mount

genuine Z32 AFM

Nismo 740cc injectors

Split fire coils

Apexi air filter

R34 turbo with bb and alum fins

super copper mix clutch

boost controller

hks ssqv

decat exhaust 3in

innovate wide band

greddy boost gauge

nistune z32 board

have meth injection but waiting to put in

japanese gas said to be around 98-100 oct dont know if true or not

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456494-fueling-issues-with-nistune/
Share on other sites

If you are able to mess about with it yourself in the software, then I urge you to download the tuning guide from their site and read it, understand it and apply it. If the mixtures don't respond to proper manipulation (of K value and the latency) and anything else that might be appropriate after your self-education, then I suggest you take it to a specialist to find out if those nasty injectors are all working properly, etc.

We have found on two cars now that the Z32 ECU even with a Nistune board on an RB25DET that the tune just doesn't work as good as a R32 ECU with a Nistune board, the cold start and idle are heaps better, and the overall tune is too. In the bad old days you couldn't modify the R32 ECU to do VCT, but you can now.

Edited by Sub Boy32

The latency setting for your injectors will be wrong. Google to see what it should be. If you cant find it try reducing it in say 100ms increments until you get the idle in the ballpark then make smaller changes up/down to zero in. You should see a lot of change in mixture at idle and a much smaller change in mixture, possibly too small to read, at WOT.

Also, i'd be a bit concerned about the abilities of a tuner who didn't want to use Nistune.

when i first put the nistune in when i made changes i was able to see them as i went now it seems you have to change the values alot to get anything and when you do get something the engine just wants to kill it self like it wants 9 afr or nothing. I will look up the latency and try that route. The tuner out here is known i guess but i guess my wife thought the guy was no good to as first thing he said is he can do it but doesnt have the program so i told him i have it. So then he goes on to say he needs to study it so he doesnt want to do.

Sounds like your ecu is in limp mode. It can be caused by a corrupt image in the Nistune board, poor installation or most likely in your case (if it was working ok previously) the Nistune board has come loose from the socket. Make sure it's pushed in properly.

Symptoms of limp mode are you can make changes in the software but it doesn't really do anything and a massively over rich idle.

  • Like 1

We have found on two cars now that the Z32 ECU even with a Nistune board on an RB25DET that the tune just doesn't work as good as a R32 ECU with a Nistune board, the cold start and idle are heaps better, and the overall tune is too. In the bad old days you couldn't modify the R32 ECU to do VCT, but you can now.

We tune at least 5 or 6 Nistunes a week minimum and they are fantastic on cars the ecu was designed for R32, R34, S15, S13 etc.

No matter what anyone says the z32 ecu conversion is junk, so many trimming and 3 party background skews that they never EVER run perfect. R32 GTST with feature pack A/C or LED vct output is a better option.

Pfc is an even better option on a RB25.

I love nistunes and we are one of their biggest customers but the z32 ecu conversions are no good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...