Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey folks,

got the rb20 back in my rx-7 and sourced a stock ecu to replace my mines tuned ecu. Seems to pull as hard, runs about 15-16 afr's running down the road and quickly changes to 10-11 when throttle is opened. If you back off it richens down to 8's and goes to the 14.5-16 again.

Which I can live with, car pulls very hard. and creeps around 14 psi high in the rev range. However the car feels like it is completely shutting off at about 6000RPM in 3rd gear and has done this consistently since i have swaped the ecu.

I do not have the transmission wiring wired as I never got the lower harness. As well my rx7 dash is run by the speedo drive and does output a signal to the ecu.

I am thinking it is one of three things.

AFM air flow cut

knock sensor

speed sensor.

Anyone know of a bypass or way to check these? if not I will have to put the mines ecu back in for drag weekend.

Rx,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458133-boostfuel-cut-6000rpm-rb20det/
Share on other sites

The most likely suspect is TP cut, which is what you are calling AFM air flow cut. There is no way to bypass this without Nistuning the ECU, so you can raise the setting for it in there.

Knock sensor will not do a "cut". It will switch you first to the knock maps then it will go even further and cut ignition timing right back, but it will not actually "cut" the engine.

Speed sensor will do it at 180 km/h on a stock ECU. Assuming that you have the RB20 gearbox sender and drive cable and RB20 compatible speedo head from a Nissan installed, and that the wiring from that speedo head is connected to the ECU, then you could be having this cause a cut. But it won't do it at 6000rpm....it will do it at ~180km/h (depending on diff gearing). And I don't think it likely that you have every link in the chain I described above in a transplant to an RX7.

TP cut as in Throttle position???

Will the speed sensor not wired have the ecu reading different signals? or just one?

As I stated the mines ecu had never gave me this problem. And as far as I know they heighten the rev limit and delete speed cut, anything else? That's why I think it is speedo related.

I have no power steering, no clutch fan, no ac, rb25 turbo, fmic, ffp. fuel pump, 3" exhaust, etc. Pulls hard and was beating an overboosted tuned mr2 last night until boost cut at around 14psi.

TP means Theoretical Pulse. It is the fundamental load index for all maps in a Nissan ECU. It is driven by AFM signal, but it is not just the AFM signal.

The Mines ECU will have had the TP load limit increased along with those other changes.

It will be the TP limit, no alternative.

Okay, Thanks man. Explains a lot!

I've ran that mines ecu for a while and seems to work fairly good, I like the stock with the lower rev limit but I may switch back. Are they as bad as everyone says they are?

I have three ecu's; a mines tuned, stock and a chipped one for 555cc injectors and z32 maf which i do not have.

Thinking of nistune but cant shell the cash now.

Can you tell me anything from my Afr's above? Seems they should not be that lean cruising or rich as i back off the throttle.

Rx,

Mines ECUs are not inherently "bad". The problem is that they have been chipped to suit a particular set-up and cannot be tuned to suit your set-up. Some people say "my car runs great on my Mines ECU" when really all they know is that it starts and runs. If by some chance it does suit your car (and you can only really be sure of that by sticking it on a dyno to make sure AFRs and timing are correct) then you can run it.

Those are my thoughts skyrine, Thinking I'll post them up on ebay unless a member wants one

Timing is the unknown for me, my wideband shows it running rich in boost around 10's with 30psi fuel pressure. keeping the throttle in spot reads 16's with it though.

RX

What STATUS has said is true. There is a lower TP cut point for zero speed conditions, which is why the old Skyline trick of cutting the speed signal wire to beat the 180km/h speed cut problem was not a good solution. You might still hit a normal TP cut even after restoring a speed signal to the ECU anyway. This is because running even the stock turbo at 14 psi with enough other mods (exhaust, cooler, etc) can get you to that point.

Search for posts by me on the topic of the voltages and signal types involved in the speed signal. The speed signal sent from the Skyline dash to the ECU is a square wave 0-5v signal. If you can fake that then you can keep the ECU happy. But I still reckon that Nistune is required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...