Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

When i had TS0.82 on a 6boost, felt same as an open 0.82 on stock mani, but i lost 500rpms response for some reason, was same tune and everything else identical.. single gate on the housing but further around the snail so maybe that caused it? E85

Stock mani, gate off housing was best setup...

longer runners will induce some lag but not as much as 500 rpm.

another way around it is to come on boost a little leaner with less timing. This will increase EGTs and get the turbo to boogie quicker

I'm tempted to FSU and go a GTX, twin scroll with twin gates if I ever get bored.

  • Like 1

longer runners will induce some lag but not as much as 500 rpm.

another way around it is to come on boost a little leaner with less timing. This will increase EGTs and get the turbo to boogie quicker

I'm tempted to FSU and go a GTX, twin scroll with twin gates if I ever get bored.

Yeah, i was expecting full boost of 20psi at 3500rpm, the GTX on stock mani did 20psi at 3800rpm with exact same tune etc...

This short clip you can see nothing happens till almost 5000rpm so it was not like a 0.63open at all..

^ that is laggy, however is your rpm gauge reading correctly?

I know mine has about a 200rpm difference to what is being shown by the ECU up the top end.

Never know, your cluster could be off its tits

post-93368-14380721219504_thumb.jpg

Here is mine, .82(I think, maybe .78) twinscroll on 6boost manifold.

From memory Trent was saying the rear housing was holding it back from making more top end. The graphs are 98 and e85.

I'd be interested in seeing what a 1.01/1.06 rear would do, I've been thinking of doing the swap

  • Like 1

Yeah, i was expecting full boost of 20psi at 3500rpm, the GTX on stock mani did 20psi at 3800rpm with exact same tune etc...

This short clip you can see nothing happens till almost 5000rpm so it was not like a 0.63open at all..

https://youtu.be/2ZjV5Pb5ySc

Lag for days !

attachicon.gifImageUploadedBySAU Community1438072122.747273.jpg

Here is mine, .82(I think, maybe .78) twinscroll on 6boost manifold.

From memory Trent was saying the rear housing was holding it back from making more top end. The graphs are 98 and e85.

I'd be interested in seeing what a 1.01/1.06 rear would do, I've been thinking of doing the swap

Not a bad result! The e85 makes such a big difference.. yeh i honestly havent seen any set ups twin scroll, gtx3076 with 1.06a/r am interested to see how itd go...

U got 289 kw on 98...i woulda expected a little more ? At least 300? Judging by others results...what boost was that at?

Edited by Kmac92

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think the shuffle can damage the turbos. It only happens at low shaft speeds and loads. It's just annoying (to some people - others are tickled by the effect) and it quite possibly reduces spool performance a little bit.
    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
×
×
  • Create New...