Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm new to this forum had my car for about 2and a half years so have got to know my car well just a quick question I usually service my car with motul 300v chrono 10W 40 every 5000kms but while I was down south I needed to top up oil and the best I could get was penrite hpr 15w 40 semi synthetic would've used no more than about 800 ml and I'm just really worried if I done any damage to it drove about 300km since top up am I better off not driving it till I do an oil change as it seems a bit different when driving. Cars a r33Gtr with mild mods sorry if question has been asked before couldn't find a specific answer relating to my concerns. Any advice will be greatly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459215-oil-issue/
Share on other sites

Ryco are fine, you need a new mechanic mate. The only thing the greddy filter gives you is a big hit to the wallet that you don't need.

I bet if you opened them up internally they would be very similar if not the same type of filter material and design.

The comparison has been done between an OEM and Ryco filter and the difference between the two was not much.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459215-oil-issue/#findComment-7594249
Share on other sites

Mate I think you need to apply your own thoughts instead of taking what your mechanic says as gospel.

At any oil change, do you really think every last cc of oil comes out that sump plug?

Of course not, there's always going to be dilution of your new oil with old oil remaining in galleries and various pockets.

Now if you noticed some dramatic change in your car's road performance after you topped up with 800cc of different viscosity oil, I'd be more concerned how come it needed topping up at all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459215-oil-issue/#findComment-7594269
Share on other sites

I know not every drop comes out at oil changes I'm definitely looking for a new workshop, I thought it could be losing oil somewhere cause usually when I service I don't require any top up. As for dramatically losing performance just was told oil was to thick to flow properly but I now think that's not the case and I doubt it needs a new dyno tune after a few months. As for the filter I done some research and it's definitely not worth the extra cash so going to be using ryco filters from now on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/459215-oil-issue/#findComment-7594301
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...