Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for an aftermarket oil temp sender that is compatible with the factory oil temp gauge. Ideally operating over the same range to give similar readings on the analogue gauge.

Why? I've recently pieced together the motor (rb26) deleting the factory oil cooler, filter housing, etc. replacing it with an RB20 item with aftermarket relocation/cooler kit. The factory oil pressure sender fitted into a port on the block which worked out sweet. There is however no spare metric holes for the oil temp sender. The aftermarket filter relocation and cooler kit I got has provision for a 1/8 NPT or similar sensor of some sort, therefore I'm looking for something plug and play I can hook up so I get an indication in the cabin

What have others done to address this

Thanks

Greendog

Edited by gdawg

Glad to hear its not a stupid question. I couldn't find anything in a previous thread. If someone has seen something embedded in an old thread, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE send us in the right direction.

Cheers

If it were me I'd be looking at a tee piece of the same story of fittings as the hoses are and just insert it (the Nissan one) into the connection between the new block or rb20 block and the hose.

Edited by GTSBoy

Perhaps my intention wasn't clear. I wasn't talking about using brass fittings to adapt the thread. Assuming the remote hose and lines are speedflow (for example) then use a tee piece from the same range to simply extend one of the lines and put the sensor in through the side of the tee piece so it is essentially

in line.

Issue is that the factory temp sensor is a m10 thread whereas the aftermarket one you have there is 1/8npt. People sell adaptors that go from not to m10 male, but ones that do m10 female are much rarer

Hence my suggestion. Oil temp sensor has to be IN the flow (unlike the pressure sensor which can be in a setup like Cal's above which probably wouldn't actually have oil in it!).

Think about it. The oil lines to the cooler/filter/whatever is remote mounted are like 1/2" or larger. So it would be trivial to arrange for an M10 male threaded sensor to go in through the side of a tee piece, with the oil flowing along the straight side of the T.

Haha wow, I forgot we were talking oil temp sensor here.......... Yeah what I have posted wont work well at all for that

If I was doing that I would be running it on my oil cooler lines anyway. I was going to suggest a male to female coupler with a port in it for a gauge sensor, but it appears M10 threaded ones are very rare. you could always drill and tap it out if you were desperate. The couplers arent made of titanium. The only issue I see is there being enough meat in some fittings to do so, as below not sure if it will work

1_430512_400_400.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...