Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm really enjoying driving around in this and especially the near dead silence within the cabin, all except for the exhaust of course which I don't mind.

Any know the flow rate of the OEM fuel pump and it's awkw capacity ?

Really don't want any pump whine if I can do without it.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/
Share on other sites

Iv had the dw300 deatschwerks pump in tank and a walbro 255 in tank, The walbro is just a little louder the DW. The DW only lasted 2.5ish years

Isn't it spelt doucheworks? Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/#findComment-7632286
Share on other sites

I'm running a RACEWORKS 340LPH E85 Safe pump in the std housing. Small amount of filing to the bottom cradle cap clip holes to lengthen the assembly. OEM wiring with 20A fuse.

*needed direct 12v to initially purge the pump

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/#findComment-7632353
Share on other sites

So they fit in Matt? I saw they were longer and would require cutting compared to the Walbro.

Did you run a direct power feed? I doubt the Raceworks/Proflow/Chinese e85 pumps will like the low voltage on idle/cruise for long.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/#findComment-7632388
Share on other sites

No they don't fit easily but are do-able.

What I think is a small amount of mods would not be as easy for the average enthusiast, I'm sure you would have no issue's scotty.

They are definitely longer which is why the bottom assembly cap required modifying to enable the assembly to clip together with the pump installed. The original pump rubber bottom cap doesn't fit, I used some less density rubber provided with the pump which takes up less space. The plug is required to be rewired, the bottom keyways and fuel filter captive washer post need shaving. OEM fuel filter is a little loose, now held on by the assembly bottom cap and foam.

It did require a 12v direct feed initially to enable the pump to purge. Haven't had any other issues, flow at idle voltage was ok. I asked about running OEM low voltage prior to purchase and was given a green light as the windings are different in these pumps compared to others...possibly why it is physically longer. I suspect voltage during cranking to be reasonably low anyway...food for thought.

Time will tell if it remains reliable, it's only been in for a couple of weeks.

Comes with a 2 year warranty ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/#findComment-7632471
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Ok, So I've got a Walbro 255 sitting on my shelf still.

Is it still worth installing it if I choose not to tune ?

I'm looking at everyone's dyno results and the peak power it way too late for what I want.

I guess that's part of auto transmission.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/#findComment-7688892
Share on other sites

Ok, So I've got a Walbro 255 sitting on my shelf still.

Is it still worth installing it if I choose not to tune ?

I'm looking at everyone's dyno results and the peak power it way too late for what I want.

I guess that's part of auto transmission.

Your stock pump is 15 years old, I know I would be changing it... It will require decent wiring, a fuse and relay to install properly, Walbro pumps don't like the low voltage supplied during cruise and idle.

Just remember, peak power in some cases might be almost triple the stock power and 30+psi, most highflows would still outflow a stock turbo by around 3000 revs. Plus when looking at the curve, having the torque converter locked Vs unlocked makes a fair difference. In manual mode it's trying to lock, in drive it is unlocked. All my results are skewed to look laggy, as the converter is locked, where as I drive on the street with the lockup clutch disconnected for better response and gearbox longevity.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/#findComment-7689257
Share on other sites

Well, other than the MAP sensor boost cut, the rest is based off airflow, so every car will be different. Bump up the boost and see how she runs, shouldn't be too hard to find the sweet spot.

If you are running a highflow, that boost level may be less than stock.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/460757-m35-fuel-pump/#findComment-7690272
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just trying to get my head around this. At 5psi of boost, you turn on your wmi pump, and then you're using a 3000cc injector, to allow flow upto the actual engine, where you have your 6x200cc injectors and a 500cc injector. If the above is correct, what advantage are you obtaining by having the 3000cc injector blocking flow, is this just incase a line breaks between that injector and the motor you can stop flow immediately? Or are the 6x200cc and 500cc less injectors and just spray nozzle?
    • Welcome! New member myself, but I had an R33 back in 2002. Best advice I could give, based on my experience: if you're running the factory turbo, be very conservative with boost. I made the mistake of just fiddling around with the boost controller and cranking the boost for fun, and the end result was my intake pipes popping off frequently from the constant deluge of oil that was being blown into the recirc by the stressed-out turbo, which itself was siphoning oil from the engine and farting it out both sides of its centre bearing (or something to that effect). If I could do it all again, I would have gotten a new turbo and had a tune dialled in professionally and then just left it alone! Funny you mention the metal shavings in the gearbox, as I had the same thing - the probe plug (magnetic drain plug, essentially) would come out caked with shavings. At least it was doing its job. Not sure if that's just sacrificial wear and part of the deal, or if my gearbox was shagged, but I wasn't abusing it. Enjoy the R33 - they're a dying breed, and if they weren't $35k+ on CarSales in Queensland, I might have picked up one of those again, instead of the 370GT I own now (though I'm loving the 370GT, that big 3.7L V6 just hits different).
    • Howdy folks. I owned an R33 back in 2002, which was thoroughly beyond my capacity (financially speaking) to maintain/insure, so we parted ways in 2004. Fast forward 21 years (to literally yesterday, in fact) and I'm now the proud owner of a 2007 V36 370GT. I'm happily surprised by how much power the VQ37VHR makes, compared to the RB25DET, considering the latter is turbocharged. I had planned to add a turbo at some point but I'm on the fence about whether I'll even need it (though I do love the sudden onset of extra torque). Any other 370GT owners around the traps, I'd love to hear about your experiences with this car (good and bad).
    • Perhaps the answer is... more jacks!* *proper jacks must be used.  
    • I NEVER think about using a scissor jack unless there is absolutely no other alternative. f**king things are dangerous, annoying and stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...