Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So what was the fix they did on the ECM? I am unable to read it properly at the moment. Will try looking at it later.

Edit: nvm, it loaded. Looks like just a firmware update. Now the question is where do we get the firmware from :yucky:

Edited by colin.ssc

Not sure whats updated software wise, but will be pretty hard to get the update in Oz. Still think a good way would be to get your tuner to delay the VCT operations for a few more minutes when engine is cold.

So what was the fix they did on the ECM? I am unable to read it properly at the moment. Will try looking at it later.

Edit: nvm, it loaded. Looks like just a firmware update. Now the question is where do we get the firmware from :yucky:

  • 1 month later...

Not sure if its the colder weather lately, or what, but mine has started to do this stutter occasionally again lately - maybe 1 in 4 cold starts.

So I started thinking of some solutions for this. I rang a tuning shop in Brisbane who said they don't have any software with the ability to delay the VCT operation.

I came up with another idea and want peoples thoughts about this as a possible solution:

Drill a small hole in the thermostat to slow down the coolant warmup speed. These cars really do heat up quickly in only a couple of minutes eg I'll leave home, make two turns and the coolant gauge will be at normal operating temp. As the VCT operation is based on coolant temp, this might delay the VCT operation long enough to heat the oil up a bit more. At most I'll be out of pocket one new thermostat and whatever time it takes if this doesn't work.

Opinions on this?

Okay I've got another little experiment to try first before I get out the drill. Can anyone else try this - turn the heater up to full blast as soon as engine is started even if this causes undesired side effects, eg sweating. This might help slow coolant warm up times. I'll report back but have been riding to work lately as weather is good

Personally I dont think drilling a hole in the thermostat will achieve what you want.

I have actual gauges fitted to my V36 that monitor all of the fluid temps (water, oil, transmission, diff.)

When the stock gauge indicates that its warmed up it really is only slightly warm (coolant that is).

Engine oil even less so & oil pressure has barely dropped to a drive-able level.

It really hasn't fully warmed up for 4-5 K's, so your hole could possibly become a problem.

Cheers.

  • Like 1

Ok I've just logged and graphed coolant vs oil warm up times at idle only. The graph does show how fast the coolant really does warm up in this car. My next step is to figure out at what coolant temp the VCT stutter starts and stops happening - this might take me a little while, obviously I need to drive around for a bit until I get some data.

X axis is time in seconds, Y axis red = coolant temp, blue = oil temp

After 2 mins of idle, coolant is about 53 celcius, after 3 mins about 60 celcius. Oil temp lags way behind...

post-137202-0-75343000-1464913568_thumb.jpg

Edited by Rufus007
  • 2 weeks later...

@colin.ssc - before I go ahead messing around with the thermostat, I've tried one last thing on this otherwise lazy Sunday. Today I filled her up with some castrol edge 5w30 (the viscosity as per service manual, so far I have only used 40 weight oils). Will report back in a few weeks on this

Lol, so your opinion is 'just do it'

Oh crap, just realised I never replied. Thought I did, maybe I closed the window before it posted. Anyway when I said just do it I meant changing the VTC revised cover that Nissan has. Some of the other forums have done this and seems to have fixed it. If you don't know what I'm talking about I'll find the posts. I thought we spoke about this before....can't remember now :P

No probs all good. I've seen several threads talking about the VTC covers, but I haven't seen any where they said "i've gone ahead and replaced them, and it worked". The only thing I've seen definitively fixing the problem was the elusive software update. Just for curiosity I dropped into Nissan today, about $900 each for the covers, or about $650 each delivered from the US. Faaark either way.

I've got three different recordings on the oil & water temps when I first noticed the stutter after cold start:

Water 82, Oil 49

Water 83, Oil 53

Water 81, Oil 47

So it appears the the VTC is probably kicking in at around the 80 degrees coolant temp. Ideally it would be dependent on the oil temp, at a guess over about 55-60 degrees to be safe. So this is maybe what the software update changes, but only a guess by me - no sure answer on this one.

I'm still thinking about this 3mm to 4mm thermostat hole drilling business to slow down the coolant warm up rate, and give the oil a chance to warm up a bit more before the coolant hits 80 degrees when the VTC kicks in. Just delaying by a couple of minutes would work I think (I don't want excessively long warm up times). Bought a thermostat gasket while I was there for $6.60 so I can think it over during the week, maybe do it on the weekend.

PS, second day on the 5w30 and the stutter happened. Felt no difference with engine characteristics etc.

Oh crap, just realised I never replied. Thought I did, maybe I closed the window before it posted. Anyway when I said just do it I meant changing the VTC revised cover that Nissan has. Some of the other forums have done this and seems to have fixed it. If you don't know what I'm talking about I'll find the posts. I thought we spoke about this before....can't remember now :P

Edited by Rufus007

Wasn't the oil a 0w40? Was pretty sure that was what I was using.

As for the temps and when VTC kicks in, I'm not too sure how it all works, I should start reading up and see if I understand any of it haha...

Ive only used 0w40 until yesterday, I threw some 5w30 in just to see if that made any difference. The answer is nope, still the same stutter. VTC temps etc was all through my own obd2 monitoring, haven't seen anyone else recording and graphing etc.

Wasn't the oil a 0w40? Was pretty sure that was what I was using.

As for the temps and when VTC kicks in, I'm not too sure how it all works, I should start reading up and see if I understand any of it haha...

Edited by Rufus007
  • 2 weeks later...

3mm hole drilled. I was just going to cut the jiggler valve off, but there are one-way screws holding the thermostat to the housing making that option difficult. So I used a long drill bit and went through the housing outlet. Some surface gunk on parts of thermostat as you can see - even though internal housing etc was 100% clean, not sure why. Anyway if this doesn't work it's about $80 for a new thermostat + housing.

I'll report back in a week on startup stutter, and also with a new warm-up graph. Wish me luck!

BTW oil does make a difference. Edge 0w40 was great and would only get stutter minor and occasionally. Edge 5w30 does it every single day and just about sends me through the windscreen as the stutter is much worse.

post-137202-0-33802500-1466858318_thumb.jpg

post-137202-0-43256200-1466858345_thumb.jpg

Edited by Rufus007
  • Like 1

Hole vs no hole: oil warmup rate is almost identical which is great (didn't want to slow that down).

coolant warmup rate takes about 4.5min longer to reach 80 Celsius, which is approx when VTC kicks in.

with no hole oil temp is at 55 Celsius as coolant reaches 80

with hole oil temp is at 63 Celsius as coolant reaches 80

Both graphs are at idle only, so real road test to follow :)

post-137202-0-38399900-1466895583_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Well tried and tested, and this doesn't work :( All that happens now is engine stutter starts when coolant is around 74 Celsius instead of the previous 80. Maybe the ecu was going off oil temp all along, and maybe the software update just raises the threshold oil temp a bit higher. All speculation of course. Oh well, now I get to install a shiny new thermostat.

You can go and lower the temperature value which is sent from the sensor to the ECU.

For example: At 40 you have 280 Ohm.

At 60 you have 130 Ohm.

What you do now is: Put a 150 Ohm resistance in series to the sensor and at 60 degrees real temperature the ECU gets

a value of 40 degrees temperature.

Or, if you want to find out the best working resistance value put in a potentiometer 0-500 Ohm and have a play with it.

As soon as you've found the best resistance value replace it with a fixed one, bit heat shrink, neat and tidy. And you know

that the temperature shown on your gauge is behind the real oil temperature always "X" degrees.

But, you have to find out if the resistance changes linear or not. If not you might be better off with the 0-500 Ohm poti.

Cost only a few cents.

Regards, Berni

Edited by BTSV_Berni
  • Like 1
On 6/29/2016 at 5:18 PM, BTSV_Berni said:

I agree this could work also, something I will try later on if needed.  And thanks also for including some technical detail, gives me a good starting point.  I went to pick up an extra oil temp sensor from Nissan to play with, but they are $108 so if going that route I'd probably just use the existing.   What I have done instead is order the consult 3 hardware clone (but original software).  Once this arrives I'm going to have a look at the VTC relearn procedure first, as I don't think the FSM procedure of just holding RPM's btwn 1800-2000 does anything.  There is also ECU updates etc but will have to be very careful with those - needs more investigation... 

Will report back once I have the consult 3.  I already have a windows XP virtual machine up and running with anticipation, since consult won't install on win10.

 

Quote

 

You can go and lower the temperature value which is sent from the sensor to the ECU.

 

For example: At 40 you have 280 Ohm.

                      At 60 you have 130 Ohm.

 

What you do now is: Put a 150 Ohm resistance in series to the sensor and at 60 degrees real temperature the ECU gets

a value of 40 degrees temperature.

Or, if you want to find out the best working resistance value put in a potentiometer 0-500 Ohm and have a play with it.

 

As soon as you've found the best resistance value replace it with a fixed one, bit heat shrink, neat and tidy. And you know

that the temperature shown on your gauge is behind the real oil temperature always "X" degrees.

 

But, you have to find out if the resistance changes linear or not. If not you might be better off with the 0-500 Ohm poti.

 

Cost only a few cents.

 

Regards, Berni

 

Edited by Rufus007

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...