Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Due to a Turbo upgrade (Going High-Mount Exhaust Manifold) & my Intercooler being a Blitz Return-Flow, I've realised I will most likely be better/should run a FFP. My first pick is Plazmaman but I've since come across a new (I think) Manifold made by a company called Otaku Garage. They claim to out-flow a genuine GReddy but idk the legitimacy of that.

Anyways, just wondering if anyone has heard of/used these Inlet Manifold's and can let me know what the go is with them. They do look like good quality from what I can see, but I don't want to have to spend money twice cos the product is bad etc.

Car is an RB25 R33 (S1), although would be good to hear back from anyone that has used the Inlet Manifold

Link is here - https://www.otakugarage.com.au/product/otaku-garage-intake-manifold-forward-facing-plenum-rb25det-series-1-2-neo/

Thanks!

Only heard about these a few weeks ago.

Wonder how the CPC or Plazmaman go in comparison.

Alright guys, here is all the testing & results on our manifolds. Head to our online store to grab one: https://www.otakugarage.com.au/shop/intake/

Notable observation, rumour has always been that the GReddy intakemanifolds caused cylinder 6 to lean out. It had always been speculation that perhaps that was incorrect, only because the flange angle direction and distance from the throttle body that i would receive the least amount of air. So far we have completed cylinder balance testing on our intakemanifolds, and the RB25DET GReddy. Before the test we were discussing what our expectation was going to be and we assumed well.

First let's start with the GReddy manifold, as I would have assumed cylinder six was quite the opposite of what people always say. Number six was actually the cylinder that received the least amount of air movement. The cylinder that receive the majority was actually cylinder two followed by cylinder three. This can also be traced to its design where the throttle flange angle points directly on cylinder number two. Unfortunately thesemanifolds are not cast identically between cylinders and the runner lengths are different. I had never realised how much of a deviation that these manifolds had until now. It is actually a very poor design in respect to balancing.

Our manifold did a better job of spreading the balance. The longer equal length CNC design off of the common collector provided for better distribution with a much lower deviated average between the cylinders. However the scenario was the same where the runner at the centre line of the throttle flange is the manifold that receives the most amount of air movement. However on this particular unit number five is the highest number and number one is the lowest. However the deviation to average is minimal in comparison.

Otaku Garage RB25/RB26 Billet CNC Intake Manifold

200 CFM source
Average flow 2950 feet per minute using , Highest (5) 3087 fpm, lowest (1) 2991 fpm

Greddy gasket ported RB25 manifold
200 CFM source
Average flow 2790 feet per minute using , Highest (2) 2988 fpm, lowest (6) 2690 fpm

For the testing process that we used a calibrated 200 CFM electric motor fan and a eGMP rated and calibrated hot wire anemometer. The measurements were taking at each individual runner and recorded at a 10 second average. Each number was recorded three times.

Pressure Tested at 50PSI no leaks or issues at all.

I used to have that style of manifold, but after several years swapped back to the standard lower runners with a MX Performance/SME plenum top (similar to plazmaman).

The shorter runners really kill the torque and also increase the spooling time of the turbo - unless it's a dedicated race car there's no way I'd consider a short runner manifold (like the Otaku Garage one) again.

Do you have any pics/link/info on your plenum?

The manufacturer of my plenum now operates under the name "Sydney Motorsports Engineering", the best way to check them out is on Facebook. I had a quick look and there's a post on 12 Feb 2015 which shows the plenum, or you can check out my build thread (for more pictures) in the projects section on here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...