Jump to content
SAU Community

ECU control of ATTESA

Gav
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gav Mentor

Gav

Posted
Posted

I'm interested to talk with anyone who has successfully controlled the ATTESSA system with their ECU.

We are actually using a Motec 185 dash to control the system as we have already assigned the PID function from the M800 to boost control.  The intent is to control transfer case line pressure via PWM output from the dash.  This will set the amount of torque sent to the front wheels.

We have the following obvious parameters available on CAN bus available to set up the control logic:

 

* individual wheel speeds

* ground speed

* G force (longitudinal and latitudinal)

* torque request and TPS (using drive by wire)

* transfer case pressure

* front and rear brake line pressures

 

I'm envisaging we will use a 3D calibration table to set the required transfer case line pressure.  This will be similar to a boost table or perhaps a traction control table.  I know the Full Race controller only uses G force and TPS as inputs, but I'm thinking rear wheel slip would be a useful input as well as front brake line pressure.

Initially to get us going we could connect the Full Race controller and log parameters, but if someone has done this previously (and is willing to share), that will save us a lot of time end effort.

 

Cheers

Gav

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/465903-ecu-control-of-attesa/
Share on other sites
Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

I've never replaced the stock computer because I've found it fine with a piggyback controller modifying the lateral G sensor.  While I can't confirm the list you had above for fullrace, the standard one uses all those inputs + the 4 ABS/wheel speed sensors.

Generally the standard system gives more 4wd with throttle, much more with rear wheel spin. The main input seems to be the Long g sensor (more acceleration = more FWD, braking = less) modified by the Lat G sensor (less FWD with more cornering with the intention that it remains "balanced" like a rwd car in corners.  The standard system is a little slow (which the motec would fix) and too conservative with 4wd in corners (which we fixed with the piggyback). BTW the group A cars did not use the standard computer but I don't know what the actual technology was....it had multiple maps controlled by switches

It will be interesting to see what you think is effective in your mapping vs what Nissan did.

  • Like 1
Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

Oh its also a long shot, but I an ex-nissan engineer in contact also remapped an attessa ECU for us once (although that car is no more). It is likely there is a difference in the maps in standard vs N1 computers in R32s.  Again, I don't have exact details of what was changed

dr phil Collaborator

dr phil

Posted
Posted

Semi-related - i have an R34 GT FOUR, with a RB25DET conversion. I'm keen to understand if there is a difference in ATTESA maps between GTR and GT4 (I expect yes, given the difference in diff, suspension, wheels etc).
Where I am up to is trying to connect to the ATTESA ecu via consult. I have written some code to connect to the engine ecu successfully, still working on talking to ATTESA. With the engine ecu you can read the maps out via consult - hopefully this is possible with ATTESA also. Can at least monitor running values, according to the service manual, includes all the sensor values and the ETS solenoid current.

  • 4 weeks later...
alexj Contributor

alexj

Posted
Posted

If it helps I've been logging the transfer case solenoid pressure for a few track outings now so I have some data and will be collecting more.

I use the stock attesa ecu and Skylab Fusion to modify the lat and long G sensor output. 

The factory map/algorythm is fairly complex and I think tricky to reverse engineer from the inputs and outputs of the stock ecu. 

I have a m4 abs system and a full race ets pro going on at some point.

I've put a couple of simple videos on my youtube channel.

 

  • Like 2
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • silviaz
      Steps to DIY sanding car back ready for respray....

      By silviaz · Posted

      So I'll put filler past the repair area a bit to make sure I don't miss anything. Then I'll block it until it's almost level, put the guidecoat, then keep blocking until it's gone. Then it's still wavy.  In regards to hitting the panel, I saw this video might give more context - Skip to 0:47 he knocks it down. But yeah I'm sanding until the guidecoat is gone then checking because otherwise my filler is still well above the bodyline. Unless what you're saying is I should put guidecoat around it early, surrounding the filler then stip once it's gone?
    • GabsReDeal
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By GabsReDeal · Posted

      I refreshed the OEM injectors with the kit and connected it up. It now ideals okay even with the IACV removed. Driving still has the same cutoff issue like the 550cc injectors so the issue is somewhere else. I bought FPG's Fuel Pump Hanger. I will be installing it next, but it is not as straightforward as I thought it was with my limited wiring knowledge and no instruction on the specific model I purchased (FPG-089). I also got the incorrect billet clamp as I could not find info on the OEM sizing.
    • MBS206
      Leaking Rear Subframe Bushing?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Stop looking at the garage floor, and turn the radio up a bit louder if there's any strange noises...
    • GTSBoy
      Unknown sound similar to BOV on positive boost with partial throttle RB26

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No. Turbo shuffle and surge/flutter are not the same thing. Specifically, on a GTR, turbo shuffle has a definite meaning. On a GTR, the twin turbos are assumed to be the same thing and to operate the same way, exactly. In reality, they do not. Their exhaust sides are fed and exhaust a little differently, to each other. Their inlet sides are fed and exhausted a little differently, to each other. Consequently, when they are "working" they are often at slightly different points on the compressor map compared to each other. What this means, particularly when coming on boost, is that one of them will spool up and start producing extra flow compared to the other, which will put back pressure on that other compressor, which will push the operating point on that other compressor up (vertically). This will generally result in it bumping up against the surge line on the map, but even if it doesn't, it upsets the compressor and you get this surging shuffle back and forth between them That is "turbo shuffle" on a GTR. It is related to other flutter effects heard on other turbo systems, but it is a particular feature of the somewhat crappy outlet piping arrangement on RB26s. There are plenty of mods that have been attempted with varying levels of success. People have ground out and/or welded more material into the twin turbo pipe to try to prevent it. Extending the divider inside it works, removing material doesn't. There are aftermarket replacement twin turbo pipes available, and these exist pretty mush purely because of this shuffle problem.
    • Duncan
      Leaking Rear Subframe Bushing?

      By Duncan · Posted

      You can temporarily* use lock collars to keep it in place until you can do the bushes, back the nuts off, slide them in, snug back up. *temporarily is often for ever
×
×
  • Create New...