Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Rb25 tps question...yes I've searched need clarity

Hi guys I've been searching on the forum and I am getting mixed info on what the tps for an rp25 should be set at for WOT.

 

I adjusted throttle plate closed to 0.50v and when I check WOT I'm reading like 4.1-4.2v

I searched and found a thread saying this was correct however another person said that's incorrect and it should be same as rb20.. 0.50 closed and 4.5 wide open.  Can one of the guru set me straight on this please? 

So now went through with my haltech to read voltages at idle and wot and I'm getting 0.00v...Looking like I need a new TPS need to ohm it out to be sure though

Edited by Ed.williams5

Update: 

Pulled connector apart and verified that terminals have good connection.  back probed with meter and with throttle plate closed got .49v however occasionally it will drop and read no voltage until I slowly move the plate open.  When throttle plate is opened WOT I had a max reading of 5.02v.  

Thinking the TPS must be bad since voltage is high and there is an occasional dead spot on the potentiometer when at idle position.

Yes I have kiwi I ohmed it out according to that it's good the part the I don't understand is where it says with plate closed it should read 4.2 to 5.2v closed.

It then says keeps measuring as you open and should increase smoothly to 4.1-4.6v. 

So obviously the closed voltage is a typo. I do have more then the specified voltage with the throttle plate open which is why I'm leaning towards the tps being bad.

 

Seems like I always get you to respond hah. Thanks for the help is much appreciated ^^

Two wired will read a high voltage and two will read a low voltage on a 3 pin potentiometer. Vice versa when you move the throttle all the way to the other pos

It is probably referring to the output voltage getting to the TPS with throttle closed needing to be around 5v

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...