Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 stage boost on R34 - please prove me wrong

This is really bugging me since I did a NEO +t conversion and used a GTT ECU. Nearly every discussion says there is 2 stage boost on an R34 - that over XXXX rpm the solenoid bleeds off some air and gives higher boost. That is except a few posts out there saying that the boost solenoid is always bleeding under normal operation and only closes in limp mode and reverts to actuator pressure.

There's been some discussion with the +t guys that the pin 104 signal from GTT ECU can do a similar job to pin 104 on the GT ECU which controls the plenum butterfly valve on the NA engine.

The R34 service manual clearly explains the way pin 104 works for the GT - it turns the solenoid on at idle and off above 3500 rpm. But all it says for GTT pin 104 is that it's off at idle and at approx 2000 rpm it comes on when the engine is suddenly raced. Where is it documented apart from hearsay that it switches at over XXXX rpm for the GTT?

To satisfy my curiosity I went out for a drive with a voltmeter connected across the solenoid plug from pin 104. Under any acceleration ("engine raced") the voltmeter showed a steady voltage (solenoid open). As soon as I relaxed the throttle the voltage dropped to zero (solenoid closed). I took it right through the rev range and as long as it was above 2000 rpm and accelerating the voltage never changed at 4500, 4700, 3500 or any other rpm. If I relaxed the throttle at 5 or 6 K rpm then the voltage dropped back to zero - it didn't maintain the 'solenoid on' voltage even at those high revs.

So what I saw seems to agree with the service manual. But where is the idea of two stage boost coming from, I just can't see how it would work on the basis of what the manual says and what I saw in my test.

I hope I'm wrong and can have it explained why so I can try using pin 104 to control the butterfly valve.

Of course it's a boost control.  Of course it's not "2-stage boost".

The factory actuator gives 5 psi.  When the bleeder solenoid valve is switched by the ECU, you get 7 psi.  The ECU does this when the ECU wants.....but in general, it has nothing to do with RPM.  It is nothing like the actuation of the plenum butterfly.  It is primarily intended to give lower boost in 1st gear.  I wouldn't be surprised if the ECU also drops the boost when it is doing traction control, but I have no evidence of that....just seems logical.

  • Like 1

Thanks. I fully expected replies from people saying that their gauges are clearly showing that there are two stages of boost and that I'm completely wrong. There are so many posts on different forums about grounding a pin to keep the boost high so what's all that about? From what you've explained that's a waste of time if the system is already at high boost except under certain conditions.

Is the R33 different and is that causing confusion with people?

1 hour ago, DatsunBanana said:

Is the R33 different and is that causing confusion with people?

Nope.  Same same.  Except for the possibility of small differences like maybe traction control interaction, because R33 had no TC.

Johnny's right about being able to control boost from Nistune, but he's missed the point that you want to use the boost control output to run your plenum valve.  However, there are intriguing possibilities to do as he says and use the output to try to run your valve, with the 3D table he talks about.  It's just that....it may work, or it may be a pain in the arse.

5 hours ago, DatsunBanana said:

? From what you've explained that's a waste of time if the system is already at high boost except under certain conditions.

Is the R33 different and is that causing confusion with people?

It's to make sure it's under high boost under all conditions all of the time. Certain conditions from Nissan are very conservative for a person who wants more power at the cost of a paperclip ;)

If you need Nistune boards or a Nistune board fitted I can organise them for a good price. Also have the ECU bench tested and loaded with a base map with whatever injectors and afm mix you have so your car is driveable to your favourite tuner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...