Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello guys just a quick question I have looked through the various topics that already exist and I couldn't seem to find a straight answer. I have a rb30 which my rb25 head will be placed on to. So I am now left with a rb25 bottom end.

 

I've just put a rb20 in a bmw e36 so as I have the parts laying around I thought about putting the rb25 internals in the rb20 I know the pistons are way to big so the question is what pistons can you use. Can a combo of rb25 crank rods and rb20 pistons be used as I'd rather not bore the rb20 block

 

Thanks for any help/advice mike

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/470268-rb20-with-rb25-internals/
Share on other sites

Not to sure of main and big end journal sizes would allow the 25 crank in the 20. If you could fit 25 crank with 20 rods and pistons it could work but you would only gain maybe 150-200cc. Piston pin height from 20 and 25 would need to be the same and squish pads would need to be recessed to accommodate the extra piston protrusion. Then piston to valve clearance could become and issue. If you have bits lying around I'd say go and start measuring and trial fitting to see if it's possible. Time and effort wise it is better to just get an rb25 and there will be a lot of people replying the same. If you like a mechanical challenge and don't mind spending the time then go for it.

Hi thanks for getting back to me that's the information I've been trying to gather. As far from what I've seen all three engines share the same rod length so the differences have to be in the pin height so in theory 20 pistons with a 25 crank won't work unless somebody can clarify and share any info they have

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi thanks for your reply you are correct if you want to make a rb24 and you can make a rb23 using the rb25 crank using the 4agz pistons. I did my own measuring and calculations regarding using the rb20 pistons with the rb25 rods and pistons and due to the difference in pin height between pistons it would require a custom piston and it would make a rb21

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...