Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh golly, what a bun fight.........

My take on it is this. Multi throttle bodies will give you two things, better transient throttle response, and better cleaner idle with large overlap cams. None of this is going to show up on a dyno at wide open throttle(s). On the road it might feel quite different, and that is where the advantage lies, not on the dyno, or quarter mile times.

For sheer balls to the wall top end horsepower, a single throttle body can be made as large as you want to make it. Throttle response and drivability will not improve. Drag cars have single throttle bodies, and the road racers keep the individual throttle bodies. What do YOU want to use YOUR car for ?

As far as inlet manifolds go, what else are you going to do to the engine, and what is most important to you ?

Long intake runners are a definite advantage for low end and mid range torque. At stock and moderate boost levels they are NOT restrictive as Sydneykid keeps on telling everyone. Air distribution is excellent. If you are planning absolutely massive boost and radical high Rpm power, something else might work better.

The GTR manifold was designed for less restriction, but it also is going to have less low and mid range torque because of much poorer cylinder filling off boost. That DETT engine relies totally on boost pressure to make it go.

I would bet that with stock boost and stock single turbo, an RB25DET will have reduced low and mid range torque, and it will not have the same top end power as the GTR simply because the stock turbo will run out of flow. Although I have not actually tried this myself.

It probably will work better if you are planning to upgrade everything else along with the intake manifold, the engine will then take on a completely different character.

At stock GTR power levels the factory GTR manifold will have near perfect air distribution. The Nissan engineers made it that way by putting in all those ridges, steps, and curves. But if you start increasing the air velocities greatly above what it was designed for, it will all start to go wrong, and the rear cylinder runs lean.

That is where all this nonsense started, guys start running 20+ psi and complain the stock manifold is rubbish. Well, maybe, but it was never designed for that.

Decide what you want it to do, and design it to do that job.

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That is where all this nonsense started, guys start running 20+ psi and complain the stock manifold is rubbish. Well, maybe, but it was never designed for that.

Excellent post Warpspeed, I would only like to add one little bit to the above para....

The Gibson GTR's ran the standard plenum and throttle bodies and the only engine dyno sheet I have seen showed 640 bhp at 1.9 bar (28 psi). So if 13 years ago they could get it to work perfectly, run 1,000 kms at race pace, up and down MtPanorama, surely it is not stretching the imagination for us to do the same now. Just the ECU improvement alone is light years ahead. :burnout:

WARPSPEED- Good explanation mate, The reason i have got the GTR plenum sitting in my shed over the Greddy on or custon one of stock runners is because i bought a big package when my engine blew, consisted of afew gtr parts including crank, rods, plenum, injectors and fuel pump n rail, also came with lots of other goodies, for me to get all these goodies at a good price i had to buy the lot. Everything is usable on my rb25 and therefor i have a gtr plenum that i am going to adapt to my head and see how she goes, thats why this thread was started. I understand that for the low-mid range torque its not going to be benificial and maybe not significant gains in top end power i havent a clue but since i got it i am going to use it seem logical? I got head port work, 256 cams therefor retaining vvt, to try n help with the breathing alittle. I think its better to put it on now whilst i have the engine out and in pieces rather than trying to swap manifolds over months down the track when the engine is in the car and driving.

Sweetr33, sounds like you have a plan.

Fitting the GTR plenum just by itself will probably make the engine feel a bit soft down low, and might be a disappointment. But if it is just the very first step in a long range plan that you have worked out, it is probably a pretty smart move.

WARPSPEED- Good explanation mate, The reason i have got the GTR plenum sitting in my shed over the Greddy on or custon one of stock runners is because i bought a big package when my engine blew, consisted of afew gtr parts including crank, rods, plenum, injectors and fuel pump n rail, also came with lots of other goodies, for me to get all these goodies at a good price i had to buy the lot. Everything is usable on my rb25 and therefor i have a gtr plenum that i am going to adapt to my head and see how she goes, thats why this thread was started. I understand that for the low-mid range torque its not going to be benificial and maybe not significant gains in top end power i havent a clue but since i got it i am going to use it seem logical? I got head port work, 256 cams therefor retaining vvt, to try n help with the breathing alittle. I think its better to put it on now whilst i have the engine out and in pieces rather than trying to swap manifolds over months down the track when the engine is in the car and driving.

Are you still running the stock ECU ?

Seen how many Jap circuit race cars have single throttle bodys now.

AS for the oz race cars that was a very long time ago and to group A rules so even if they wanted to change them they can't under group A.

Ask John munro about ND4SPD and you will see its a genuine streeter but we are going to change the car around for a few months to show its tru performance as it has run 142mph down the 1/4 on basic dunlop road tyres wait till we set up the chassis and run semi drag rubber + good fuel and race tune.

Ok Updating, Me and dad went and had a closer look at the gtr manifold. Seems the gtr runners where they meet the head are round where the gtst inlet port shape is sort of like a butterfly shape, Our theory is to chop the standard gtst inlet manifold about 2 inches from the flange to the head, retaining the water cooler feature, which would also make the part where wer need to adapt the gtr plenum also round following so far?

There was going to be a drama fitting the injectors into the gtr plenum, meaning we had to drill holes into the runners and make alloy sleeves to fit the injectors and get the right angle of fire etc, but now with retaining the standard inlet flange we already have hoels for injectors and also a good spray angle with the aid of the inlet water cooling.

Another drama we came across with the initial thought of just making an adapter plate was that the gtst inlet ports are wider than the gtr plenum holes so we would have to somehow taper down the the correct size. Was going to be a hassle so we have decided this is the best way. Let me know what u guys think and know about our idea

This has been done before by many people. The way they do it is as you suggest. Cut all the GTST runners off straight, just before the injectors, and either weld on the GTR plenum direct, or better still, weld on a flat flange plate, and then bolt on the GTR plenum.

There will be quite a bit of grinding and matching because the runners DO NOT LINE UP perfectly. GTST runners are almost evenly spaced, the GTR plenum has the runners spaced in three pairs to suit the three twin throttle bodies. Every runner needs to be moved sideways a small amount. This is not obvious just by quickly looking, but if you look very carefully you will see what I mean.

You will come across the problem that cylinders 3&4 dip down on the RB25 lower runners to make them equal length. This to me seems like the biggest problem.

***Does anyone have an RB20 lower runner section that they can look at for me!!!****

I'm going to have a red face I can tell but... what is that? Some sort of wild mods to the 5th and 6th cylinder?

Nah, #5 and #6 are different to clear the master cylinders, brake and clutch. As you can see they are the same close to the cylinder head, so you can cut and weld on a flange. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...