Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, ActionDan said:

Thanks,

 

Yeah bit extreme. People making more power than me wit this pump without doing that. 

 

Yeah, see if a R33/S14 fuel tank hat/lid is the same size. Use that - easier.

The fuel hat off an s14 fits in there but the plugs are different. Not a problem if you swap to s14 plugs and rewire to suit.

You can modify the stock 34 hat in the same way which is what I have done.

If you cut one open you'll see its actually quite restrictive at the part where it bends, well less than a -6 fitting.

I have been running a modified hat from 400awkw onwards. It's pretty easy to drill out the standard fittings and use -6 bulk heads which should be plenty enough for you. -8 shouldn't really be needed in this case.

Cut the webbing out of the way and smooth it out.A dremel is good for this. Just need to get it to the point that the nylon washer is able to seal properly and you won't have any issues.

Some people have gone to the extent of getting a replacement hat made up out of alloy which is the best way of doing it as you can lay it out exactly as you want

Are the RB26 fuel lines 5/16" standard? 

I popped that fuel filter in last night and the hoses seemed to go on easy compared to the standard filter Tightened up OK and no leaks while idling, but just surprising.

 

im interested in milling off the supply hose and fitting a sharp 90 degree bulkhead fitting to minimise losses around that bend, and also be able to upgrade to -6 ot -8 in the future.

I'm using a pwm fuel pump controller so i'm not worried about the return line or jet pump line sizes.

would a -8 90 degree bulkhead fit under the pump cover or would I need to go a -6?

one of these:

s-l300.jpg

or these: (worried about clearance due to radius)

833-218x218.jpg

Edited by burn4005

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...