Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday guys,

Trying too put my intake cam in (Tomei PonCam) and it doesn’t want too torque down without going over the 9-12nms and is damn near impossible too turn once it is tightened down. 

History on the motor: one of the valves on the intake side got damaged (rear valve, cyl 6) by FOD, so I pulled the head and it went too a machine shop I darwin. I just goot the head cleaned up and checked over with new stem seals. Got the head back assembled and put it back on the block With thicker Cometic gasket and ARP studs. Checked the torque on the cams and got the car running again (double, triple and then checked timing belt again!!).

Car would start but would run rough as and once it warmed up didn’t want too start again, I put it down too being untuned and it had a very strange metallic vibrating noise from the motor. While idling to bleed the coolant it made metal snapping bang and stopped. Compression tested it and it read 125-125-40-110-125-110 (semi warm)??

Pulled the rocker covers and found the 7th cam cap cheered off, 6th was tight, 5th-3rd were loose and the rest tight.

Decided too pull the motor too make it easier to investigate, tightened remaining bolts on the cam back down and decompression tested it; 115-113-113-113-117-110 (dead cold). Attributed the low #6 to not having a cam cap on.

Now the issue I am having now is when putting the cams back on with brand new oem bolts, the exhaust side went down evenly and as it should, but the intake would not go down without over torquing the bolts, I put the old bolts back in and ran it all the way down (evenly) and once it was seated it would not turn!!

Comparing the intake, exhaust cam and respective valves, the intake side has far more wear on it across all cylinders (basically brand new cams).

So after writing a bloody novel, my question is;  what can cause excessive wear and make the intake cam so much harder too install? It seems too me that the valves aren’t dressing properly,  which would explain the noise and wear, but whim at a loss as to why that would be the case? 

Cheers for any help!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473429-s1-rb25-intake-cam-torque-issue/
Share on other sites

Same cam caps, made sure there were in the right order, orientation and weren’t damaged at all. Engine was top dead Center and cams were on the TDC markings, so the pistons aren’t interfering with the the pistons as all, I double checked that.

The head was (meant to be) decked when it sent it off to be machined so the head shouldn’t be warped....I considered the possibility of the cam being bent since the caps did snap while it was running but this wouldn’t have caused the excessive wear across all the cylinders?

10 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Decked != straight.  Take a bent head.  Machine the bottom surface of it flat.  Sits on the block nicely, BUT THE TOP IS STILL BENT.  It's a common mistake.

Yeh I see what you mean, did think of it that way, wouldn’t that cause the intake and exhaust cam too be hard too install tho? 

Is there a way too test of the top of the head is bent?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...