Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday guys,

Trying too put my intake cam in (Tomei PonCam) and it doesn’t want too torque down without going over the 9-12nms and is damn near impossible too turn once it is tightened down. 

History on the motor: one of the valves on the intake side got damaged (rear valve, cyl 6) by FOD, so I pulled the head and it went too a machine shop I darwin. I just goot the head cleaned up and checked over with new stem seals. Got the head back assembled and put it back on the block With thicker Cometic gasket and ARP studs. Checked the torque on the cams and got the car running again (double, triple and then checked timing belt again!!).

Car would start but would run rough as and once it warmed up didn’t want too start again, I put it down too being untuned and it had a very strange metallic vibrating noise from the motor. While idling to bleed the coolant it made metal snapping bang and stopped. Compression tested it and it read 125-125-40-110-125-110 (semi warm)??

Pulled the rocker covers and found the 7th cam cap cheered off, 6th was tight, 5th-3rd were loose and the rest tight.

Decided too pull the motor too make it easier to investigate, tightened remaining bolts on the cam back down and decompression tested it; 115-113-113-113-117-110 (dead cold). Attributed the low #6 to not having a cam cap on.

Now the issue I am having now is when putting the cams back on with brand new oem bolts, the exhaust side went down evenly and as it should, but the intake would not go down without over torquing the bolts, I put the old bolts back in and ran it all the way down (evenly) and once it was seated it would not turn!!

Comparing the intake, exhaust cam and respective valves, the intake side has far more wear on it across all cylinders (basically brand new cams).

So after writing a bloody novel, my question is;  what can cause excessive wear and make the intake cam so much harder too install? It seems too me that the valves aren’t dressing properly,  which would explain the noise and wear, but whim at a loss as to why that would be the case? 

Cheers for any help!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473429-s1-rb25-intake-cam-torque-issue/
Share on other sites

Same cam caps, made sure there were in the right order, orientation and weren’t damaged at all. Engine was top dead Center and cams were on the TDC markings, so the pistons aren’t interfering with the the pistons as all, I double checked that.

The head was (meant to be) decked when it sent it off to be machined so the head shouldn’t be warped....I considered the possibility of the cam being bent since the caps did snap while it was running but this wouldn’t have caused the excessive wear across all the cylinders?

10 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Decked != straight.  Take a bent head.  Machine the bottom surface of it flat.  Sits on the block nicely, BUT THE TOP IS STILL BENT.  It's a common mistake.

Yeh I see what you mean, did think of it that way, wouldn’t that cause the intake and exhaust cam too be hard too install tho? 

Is there a way too test of the top of the head is bent?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...