Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Perhaps look at a GTS25 (RB25DE) with a 2.5L NA engine? They are 140-something Kw (@ flywheel) stock and since a R32 weighs between 1260kg to 1320kg, it should pretty alright.

Dunno how much of a difference full-comp will cost you for a turbo R32 vs. a NA R32 (I don't think it's like night and day), it maybe better goin the turbo route.

IMO I don't think it's worth paying $2000-odd dollars on full comp insurance on a car that's some 12 - 15 years old. You'll pay half the value of the car just in insurance in 3 to 4 years.

only problem with R32 GTS25s is that most of em are auto models.

mines an N/A 1993 V Selection 2. The mods i have are... stainless steel fujitsubo extractors, HKS Airbox and full 2.5" exhaust with a rather high flowing cat :rofl:

it made 87rwkw with no tuning on 98RON fuel and only an ECU reset. Haven't properly dyno'd it since i'm droppin an RB25DET and TD06-25G into it :(

I am just look at a r32 gts-t non turbo 1989, but other than changing th ewhole engine itself what else can be done to improve the performance without spending a great deal of money?, because this is my first car by the way. I also want to ask how much insurance would i be paying if i went in teh 3rd party direction for this particular car non-turbo?

well my mate bought a R32 GTE (with an RB20E engine, which is even slower than a normal non turbo) for $1.50 and cost him $4500 something to bring into the country, plus 2k in compliance and rego and for $6500 he's got a 4 door R32 whicha buggered engine. So he's gonna kill the engine (quite litereally tharsh the **** out of it) then replace it with an RB25DET or something.

You'd be looking for a 1989 R32 GTS, which shouldn't be too expensive since everyone's looking for something tricked out. Since there's not really a demand for it, finding a relatively highly modified R32 GTS will be easy. I'm thinking something with 6 throttle bodies and the works. There's a few in Japan (not 89 models though) that run that setup and keep up with stock R33 GTSt's.

If you're in glenny send me an email sometime, I'll give you a ride in my clapped out GTS. And if you like it I can organise one from japan that's uber cheap.

I am some what confused about what a skyline gts-t and a gts are, what are the differences between the 2?, because i have never had a proper answer to that question.

By the way how cheap could u get the skylines any way the GTS or gts-t?

GTE = R32 poverty pack skyline with 2L N/A SOHC Engine (liek the one in the R31's in australia, but instead of 3L its 2L)

GTS = Regular R32 N/A with RB20DE engine

GTS25 = late model (think post 1992 or something) car with 2.5L N/A engine and mostly in auto (manual GTS25 is hard to find)

GTSt = GTS with a turbo engine called the RB20DET

GTS Type S = GTS Coupe with Full Sports Options as standard

GTSt Type M = GTSt Coupe with Full Sports Options as standard

GTS4 = GTS or GTSt with 4WD instead of RWD

confused enough?? :rofl:

the 89 GTSt i've brought down so far have cost maybe about 9k landed for an average one, and around 11k for a good one. Haven't brought down an N/A yet, coz I usually skip em.

The rules are about to change in August to either

a) any cars made after 1988 have to go through regular RAWS compliance instead of being eligible for 15 year exception

or

B) any cars brought in under the 15 year rule must have no accident history and be factory standard

or

c) 15yr rule change to 25 year rule.

This is thru some guys I know who work with DOTARs so brace yourself for changes to be made in August (and no they don't need to pass it thru parliament and give 18 months notice for an amendment).

yeah.. was meant to be july though :rofl: then the minister apparently got shuffled around to another post.

but if you've heard august its probably august..

They better make it if you've purchased the car you can still bring it in (like last time), or i'm up the shitter.. should be right..

yeah, by law they have to apply the rules that applied at the time of purchase, so everyone who buys now should be ok. Even if you bring it in after the law change, compliance etc is done under the laws that applied at the time of purchase. Its a pain in the arse with the extra paperwork and ringing DOTARS required, but yeah in the end it should be ok.

the price of insurance for a non turbo r32 vs turbo r32 wont be that much difference

get some quotes. the main cost of insurance is cos its an imported car, adding a turbocharger will add around an extra $200 per year or a tiny bit more

I didnt see this thread until now.

I posted this in your other thread.

With the money you would spend on making the gts faster you could have bought a gtst.

I have thought about getting rid of the rb30e and dropping an rb25de into an r31 but it really isnt worth it. I think the most it would it making at the wheels with some mods would be 110rwkw. I doubt it would have the same torque output even with the same mods.

The rb20de would be even worse, torque is going to be pretty sad. When you have an N/A engine displacement makes quite a difference and is an advantage.

The rb30 with the same mods would have a similar output (90 - 100rwkw) but it would have more torque.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skylinerz

How can it because i want to get a r32 without a turbo because of the insurance and all, but what mods can i get to improve the horsepower, acceleration ect without a turbo.

Its been posted up on the forums a few times that the difference between N/A and turbo skylines isnt that much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skylinerz

what mods can i get to improve the horsepower, acceleration ect without a turbo.

If you are serious about modding the rb20de go with what blitz said. Its simply not worth going any further apart from turbo charging it.

I think you'd get from 0-100km/h in around 8.2 - 9.0 secs.

I say, save you money up for a gtst. You will be thankful you did and the turbo makes a world of difference.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...