Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

I'm looking for some advice with a dilemma I'm having on choosing which direction I should go with upgrading my RB25DET's oil pump.

The current one is an N1 with a billet gear, and I wouldn't know whether the backing plate is factory or aftermarket as I bought the engine from the previous owner who had it built.

My first reason comes down to my own fear and uncertainty created from all of the horror stories I've heard about N1 pump failures although I know half of them are due to dodgy installation, and my second reason is that I feel that the capable power figure for my current fuel and turbo setup would be right at the edge of what the N1 can safely handle as moving forward I'd like to have the headroom to aim for bigger power safety with the piece of mind.

Originally I was considering going with a Nitto pump until realising that the whole engine would need to be disassembled as the crank snout would require machining to suit an upgraded crank collar to pair with the pump . Which obviously isn't a viable option as it's already a brand new built engine that had just only finished being run in for 1000km before I bought it.

However I've come across a examples of RB's running external wet sump oil pump setups instead which has sparked my interest in them, such as this kit from Ross Performance
https://golebysparts.au/products/nissan-rb-ross-lh-mounting-single-stage-external-oil-pump-kit-race-series-damper-306500-104?variant=15660827246701 

as I've been thinking about if this alternative could be worth it rather than the expense and time that would be involved with the original idea?

I'd love to hear any opinions/suggestions yous may have to offer,

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484484-oil-pump-upgrade-dilemma/
Share on other sites

Just run oil pressure to your ECU and shut down the motor if you lose pressure. Most N1 pumps in the world don't fail, the biggest risk factor seems to be bouncing off the rev limiter like a foo.

Of course if you are thinking big big power (you didn't really give a figure above) then you should be changing to a different oil pump setup as the fundamental design from nissan was not great for quadrupling factory power....external wet pump is better a bit of a half pregnant option, dry sump is the way to keep a big $$ engine safe

  • Like 2
15 hours ago, God_Z_illa said:

already a brand new built engine that had just only finished being run in for 1000km before I bought it.

You would assume a crank collar would have been fitted during the build process.

  • Like 1

Sorry for the late responses.

I left that out by mistake Duncan, my bad mate. The power I want to make for now is between 600 - 650hp ish (it hasn't received a power tune post run in) and my ultimate goal I'd like to eventually achieve would be 750 - 800hp if safely possible, which is why I'd like some headroom with the pump.

I have looked into dry sump kits as well but honestly speaking that wouldn't be an option within my means, unless you could recommend a cost effective way to piece one together?

I also know an external wet sump system isn't a full measure compared to dry sump, but how would one stack up against other aftermarket internal oil pumps? Between the two which would you suggest, and what would be the pros and cons of each?

Thanks.

On 02/03/2023 at 11:24 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

You would assume a crank collar would have been fitted during the build process.

I'd like to, but I spoke to the original owner the other day to ask him and he wasn't sure at all but said he would ask the engine builder, which is making it less likely.

  • Sad 1
On 09/03/2023 at 10:44 PM, God_Z_illa said:

Sorry for the late responses.

I left that out by mistake Duncan, my bad mate. The power I want to make for now is between 600 - 650hp ish (it hasn't received a power tune post run in) and my ultimate goal I'd like to eventually achieve would be 750 - 800hp if safely possible, which is why I'd like some headroom with the pump.

I have looked into dry sump kits as well but honestly speaking that wouldn't be an option within my means, unless you could recommend a cost effective way to piece one together?

I also know an external wet sump system isn't a full measure compared to dry sump, but how would one stack up against other aftermarket internal oil pumps? Between the two which would you suggest, and what would be the pros and cons of each?

Thanks.

Regardless of what oiling system you use, the key is to setup limits and cuts based on oil pressure. I have tonnes of cuts and limits on mine. Duncan's advise is spot on. You dont need dry sump for 800hp. If you are really paranoid, then add Accusump or some sort of oil accumulator to the mix.

  • Like 2

I know some people have gone the external pump with a wet sumo route, but I use nitto internal pump (which seems to be very similar to the Tomei pump). A external pump requires a crank mandrel to drive it, mounting and an extra belt to throw or misalign, I don't see that is safer with a wet sump

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
On 15/03/2023 at 5:26 AM, Duncan said:

I know some people have gone the external pump with a wet sumo route, but I use nitto internal pump (which seems to be very similar to the Tomei pump). A external pump requires a crank mandrel to drive it, mounting and an extra belt to throw or misalign, I don't see that is safer with a wet sump

Thankyou both Predator1 and Duncan for advising me and my apologies again for yet another late response, I don't mean to make a habit of it.

I knew that it was probably a long shot but due to the high chances that an aftermarket crank collar wasn't fitted when the engine was built, I couldn't help hoping that a external wet sump system might be the workaround for the engagement issues that the stock collar has with conventional pumps, as well as a solution wouldn't require engine disassembly. 

I'm still quite the long way off from my project running and driving as the engine has to go in out a fair amount of times for test fitting and fab work which could take a good while, but once I get closer to that stage when I'm more able too, I'll cop it on the chin and get a collar fitted and a Nitto pump like originally planned.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...