Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, harambe34 said:

Hey guys. Just after confirmation whether the water feed to the turbo comes from the engine block or from the hose behind the engine?

https://nissan.epc-data.com/skyline/er34/3944-rb25det/engine/144/15192P/

I can't tell where the water piping is meant to go but it appears to me that the water feed is from the block.

That shows that the water inlet pipe, 15192P, is on the outboard side of the turbo. The connection on the inboard side of the turbo is thus the outlet, and it very clearly runs forward, towards the plumbing around the front of the engine/water pump.

I must say that I am not speaking as an authority here, because I've never paid attention to what actually runs where, but it was always my impression that the water for the inlet does not come out of the side of the block. The oil certainly does. But I always thought the water for the turbo came from the little clusterf**k of pipes under the back end of the inlet manifold.

5 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

That shows that the water inlet pipe, 15192P, is on the outboard side of the turbo. The connection on the inboard side of the turbo is thus the outlet, and it very clearly runs forward, towards the plumbing around the front of the engine/water pump.

I must say that I am not speaking as an authority here, because I've never paid attention to what actually runs where, but it was always my impression that the water for the inlet does not come out of the side of the block. The oil certainly does. But I always thought the water for the turbo came from the little clusterf**k of pipes under the back end of the inlet manifold.

Apparently the coolant feed really does come from the block? At least if this photo is anything to go by: image.thumb.png.a4c10fbf59315c1960ace459bb4a3649.png

The EPC says it comes from section 110 which is the engine block. And the return seemingly goes around the back of the head to the hose barb at the back of the intake manifold which is not something I was expecting.

If I was anywhere near my car I'd go have a look.

Anyway, that photo does align with the shape of the inlet pipe on the EPC data drawing, so I concur, it does come from the block. All good.

And now that I am forced to squint down to 20/20 vision, I see that the outlet pipe is actually possible (and correct) to interpret as running backwards away from the turbo, and around the back to the point on the back of the inlet manifold plumbing that I originally posited as the source for the supply. So those two brackets on that pipe would be on the back of the head or thereabouts.

  • 1 month later...
On 15/04/2023 at 5:00 AM, joshuaho96 said:

https://nissan.epc-data.com/skyline/er34/3944-rb25det/engine/144/15192P/

I can't tell where the water piping is meant to go but it appears to me that the water feed is from the block.

Thanks guys, it's all hooked up now :D

On 17/04/2023 at 6:06 PM, GTSBoy said:

If I was anywhere near my car I'd go have a look.

Anyway, that photo does align with the shape of the inlet pipe on the EPC data drawing, so I concur, it does come from the block. All good.

And now that I am forced to squint down to 20/20 vision, I see that the outlet pipe is actually possible (and correct) to interpret as running backwards away from the turbo, and around the back to the point on the back of the inlet manifold plumbing that I originally posited as the source for the supply. So those two brackets on that pipe would be on the back of the head or thereabouts.

Thanks mate, I ended up sorting it out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...