Jump to content
SAU Community

P0340 RB25DET ER34 Skyline - Car Wouldn't Start


Recommended Posts

Had a strange one today at the track. Engine was hot - very hot, but luckily managed to cool it down for a good 5 minutes before this occured. 

I stalled the car when pulling out of the pit (amateur, I know) and the car wouldn't start. I thought the starter was dead and got some guys to help me push start the car, which was fine. After, I checked the code and it threw a P0340 for the cam sensor - which is where exactly? I replaced the crank sensor (CAS) not long ago, maybe 5k kms, with a rebuilt one here in Japan (could also be a dud). When searching for P0340, I really can't find much related to the 25det. Googling cam sensor just displays images of the crank sensor, I believe the names are used interchangably.

I'm tempted to chuck a new starter in seeing as they're cheap and the car is at 255k on what I believe is the original. But basically, I'll be shipping this car back to Europe from Japan very soon. I have two weeks before my next (last) track session and would really like to not accidentally cook the engine if I stall it when it's hot. There's also the issue that the car has to be operational for the shipping company. So I ask, has anyone had this code/phenomena before and solved the issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GoHashiriya said:

Had a strange one today at the track. Engine was hot - very hot, but luckily managed to cool it down for a good 5 minutes before this occured. 

I stalled the car when pulling out of the pit (amateur, I know) and the car wouldn't start. I thought the starter was dead and got some guys to help me push start the car, which was fine. After, I checked the code and it threw a P0340 for the cam sensor - which is where exactly? I replaced the crank sensor (CAS) not long ago, maybe 5k kms, with a rebuilt one here in Japan (could also be a dud). When searching for P0340, I really can't find much related to the 25det. Googling cam sensor just displays images of the crank sensor, I believe the names are used interchangably.

I'm tempted to chuck a new starter in seeing as they're cheap and the car is at 255k on what I believe is the original. But basically, I'll be shipping this car back to Europe from Japan very soon. I have two weeks before my next (last) track session and would really like to not accidentally cook the engine if I stall it when it's hot. There's also the issue that the car has to be operational for the shipping company. So I ask, has anyone had this code/phenomena before and solved the issue?

What is the actual code? These aren't OBD2 cars, they don't use OBD2 generic codes. If the starter is dead it won't crank. Most likely the code is that your ECU is losing the signal from the CAS altogether for whatever reason. The ECUs in these cars are pretty basic and don't do anything like cam correlation codes or any other plausibility checks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would explain a lot re my findings.  The code I got from NDS was “Code 11 cam angle sensor circuit (CAS) P0340” - should have specified. Also, should have mentioned the engine is stock.
 

The starter motors were cheaper than I thought so ordered one anyway last night, will throw it in this weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoHashiriya said:

That would explain a lot re my findings.  The code I got from NDS was “Code 11 cam angle sensor circuit (CAS) P0340” - should have specified. Also, should have mentioned the engine is stock.
 

The starter motors were cheaper than I thought so ordered one anyway last night, will throw it in this weekend. 

image.thumb.png.8312ed3facc6bf56ed5f3105898d6844.png

Looks like you want to check for power and ground on the CAS, then try seeing if there's continuity on the cam/home and crank signal wires from the CAS to the ECU harness. You can try also backprobing the ECU connector to see what kind of voltage those wires are delivering in the specified conditions in that table. Easiest way of course is an oscilloscope to read signal from those pins but not sure you can easily find one of those.

You can also just use NDS while cranking to see if it reports RPM. If it does the ECU is getting some kind of signal. Oscilloscope will tell you how noisy it is.

Edited by joshuaho96
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

but not sure you can easily find one of those.

Cheap handhelds available on Aliexpress. I bought one for <<$200 which is excellent (the blue Hantek 2 channel one) which is over $200 now (I think). But there are <<$100 options for even lighter duty examples. If you don't need more than 10MHz it's really very cheap to own one these days.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

image.thumb.png.8312ed3facc6bf56ed5f3105898d6844.png

Looks like you want to check for power and ground on the CAS, then try seeing if there's continuity on the cam/home and crank signal wires from the CAS to the ECU harness. You can try also backprobing the ECU connector to see what kind of voltage those wires are delivering in the specified conditions in that table. Easiest way of course is an oscilloscope to read signal from those pins but not sure you can easily find one of those.

You can also just use NDS while cranking to see if it reports RPM. If it does the ECU is getting some kind of signal. Oscilloscope will tell you how noisy it is.

 

6 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Cheap handhelds available on Aliexpress. I bought one for <<$200 which is excellent (the blue Hantek 2 channel one) which is over $200 now (I think). But there are <<$100 options for even lighter duty examples. If you don't need more than 10MHz it's really very cheap to own one these days.

Cheers for this. I'll check if we have one at work I can nab and go from there. 

Backprobing is easy, but yeah, need the full story really. If it is $1-200 for an oscilloscope, I might just try the backprobing method and buying a spare CAS to cover me. They're also about $150-200 for these rebuilt units. Plus, I could probably sell it in Europe at a profit if I need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...