Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As Dose said before, if u want to spend cash do it on more value for money stuff.

But if u have the cash this is cool, but it’s designed to sit on top of the RB25 lower shell

 

IMG_0171.jpeg

Edited by Watermouse
  • Like 1
12 minutes ago, R32.RB said:

90mm throttle body

big throttle bodies don't magically make more power.

You only need to go bigger if you have more boost pre throttle than post throttle when at WOT.

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

7 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

Would a 74mm be fine for a Neo 25, 98 fueled 300wkw or 68 would be more appropriate?

Edited by Watermouse
13 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

big throttle bodies don't magically make more power.

You only need to go bigger if you have more boost pre throttle than post throttle when at WOT.

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

Well, tell me how I can make around the 500-600hp mark with a T3 top Mount turbo if my Aeroflow 6262 .84 T4 is too big as I was going to build it for 5-600 and flex fuel and stages like boost Lvl 1 - 15 psi boost lvl 2- 20 psi boost lvl 3 27-30 psi for example 

I'm running a greddy style plenum with stock throttle body on my rb30 (rb25 series 2 head) stagea, it is making 400kw through that.

There are plenty of ways to spend money on the car, you don't need to change the intake you have for 600hp

  • Like 1
18 minutes ago, Watermouse said:

Would a 74mm be fine for a Neo 25, 98 fueled 300wkw or 68 would be more appropriate?

74mm would be good, however you will find you will need to gently ramp in the pedal vs. throttle so it feels smooth and linear (not like those silly carb V8s where you touch the throttle 1mm and the car wants to fry tyres).

This is how mine is dialled in with a 74mm DBW TB, I wanted 68mm but Plazmaman couldn't weld a 68mm flange onto the plenum.

image.thumb.png.2022a25de45c6b9ef1867c80585a0285.png

image.thumb.png.3e15a58cb641deb0ab933bf6baf9dc35.png

 

11 minutes ago, R32.RB said:

Well, tell me how I can make around the 500-600hp mark with a T3 top Mount turbo if my Aeroflow 6262 .84 T4 is too big as I was going to build it for 5-600 and flex fuel and stages like boost Lvl 1 - 15 psi boost lvl 2- 20 psi boost lvl 3 27-30 psi for example 

You said you want 373kW to 447kW, you don't need a 62mm turbo to do that, that turbo can spin over 500kW+

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

74mm would be good, however you will find you will need to gently ramp in the pedal vs. throttle so it feels smooth and linear (not like those silly carb V8s where you touch the throttle 1mm and the car wants to fry tyres).

This is how mine is dialled in with a 74mm DBW TB, I wanted 68mm but Plazmaman couldn't weld a 68mm flange onto the plenum.

image.thumb.png.2022a25de45c6b9ef1867c80585a0285.png

image.thumb.png.3e15a58cb641deb0ab933bf6baf9dc35.png

 

You said you want 373kW to 447kW, you don't need a 62mm turbo to do that, that turbo can spin over 500kW+

Okay I must of got my letters wrong instead of hp  I’d like to make 450-600kw i know it’s quite easy to make it on an RB I already got the turbo for free so it’s brand new the aeroflow 62 .84 T51r mod already done T4 flange can I change it to a t3

 

but please tell me how 

Is there a reason why you want close to 600kW in a R32 GTS-t?

Have you thought about suspension work, subframe changes (from a newer car, offsetting it), diff choice, brakes, gearbox?

There's a high chance you're running a RB20DET gearbox which will not like close to 600kW being sent through it.

Also a 6262 won't get you close to 600kW.

5 minutes ago, Watermouse said:

@Dose Pipe Sutututu  thank you so much, understand what u mean and appreciate that info

I think way too many people get caught up in the whole bigger TB for more power, but that's only if it becomes a restriction.

In a FI environment, the TB size is not as sensitive, where as in a NA environment, you find with the throttle at 100% and if the plenum still registers a vacuum, then your TB is undersized and requires to be upgraded.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...