Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a question with regards to R34 GTR guards.
All the info here is quite old. Useful, but old.

At what point does the bumper itself become a clearance issue with wide wheels on a R34 GTR, specifically the part I've drawn in red here:

image.thumb.png.b7d4f64c1626815e549f02bc1e004b00.png

All of the info that people post about implies that 285 is as far as you'd go before scrubbing becomes an issue, but they speak of hitting the inner plastic liners, not the bumper itself.
Just how wide could you go if you took the liners out?

Has anyone done it? I have been messing with my own car and spacers and heavily cursed my lack of planning, but I might not feel so bad if there's actually no gains to be had by going a GTR guard and front bar combination for $5k+ of money I do not have after spending about that much already on my solution which now has problems. (Woo)

At least I now know why GTR guards and bumpers flare out like this over their GTT lesser cousins.

image.thumb.png.310873a146898a886fc55b8937dd76c6.png

I feel that in 2024, someone has gone further and attempted to run 315's or somesuch on the front of a R34 GTR.
If you have, please post. If you're tried and failed for some other reason definitely post so I feel better about my mistakes :D

I don't know the answer with a 34, but for sure the standard bumper location is the limiting factor with a 32, that is where the larger diameter tyres I was trying to run were rubbing (noting I had already rolled the guard lip)

On 06/06/2024 at 5:50 AM, ianp said:

I had 295s on mine when I had a 34 and they didn't rub and that was with Nismo coilovers

Do you have any pictures? Love to see chunky tyres on our cars.
Guards were made for 300mm slicks so let's see them chonky bois!

17 hours ago, ianp said:

They were 19*11 +25 with a 10mm spacer to clear the shocks. Tyres from memory were 295/35/19

One of my questions about this was how/if the R34 GTR strut is different to the R34 GTT (I mean it could easily be).

In my car, the 18x9+30 feels like it is 0.0001mm from the strut with a 265 on it. Given a 10.5 +15 is closer to the strut than an 18x9+30, it would certainly foul... surely

I am encouraged that a 19x11+25 would need a spacer to clear the R34 GTR suspension arms at least!

3 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

One of my questions about this was how/if the R34 GTR strut is different to the R34 GTT (I mean it could easily be).

In my car, the 18x9+30 feels like it is 0.0001mm from the strut with a 265 on it. Given a 10.5 +15 is closer to the strut than an 18x9+30, it would certainly foul... surely

I am encouraged that a 19x11+25 would need a spacer to clear the R34 GTR suspension arms at least!

It only needed a spacer because it was the Nismo struts with the external resevoir, if it had been regular coilovers, it probably would have been ok

That's the thing I don't get is the issue is not the shocks in the 34 GTT......

image.thumb.png.2cd31e56ac389c37ba211feb1461e7a2.png

I assume the GTR geometry is different here.

SQUARE PEG IN ROUND HOLE WHY WON'T YOU WORK!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...