Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Milkmun said:

The prices of NCs are going to go up thanks to you... and partially the MCM guys.

I would be lying if I said I wasn't interested in what MCM were going to do with the NC

I really enjoy their banter and occasional collaborations (like Alan from TSF, Ben from BCW, or any of the Haltech guys throwing around their experience), and I have probably watched everything they have put out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997876
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, r32-25t said:

I’m guess it’ll end up with a turbo 

One would assume a turbo is somewhere in its future down the line given they slap turbos on pretty much everything that arrives 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997879
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Milkmun said:

If it does get a turbo it would blow the JCW Mini out of the water considering how "close" some of the tests were.

Then again the Mini would probably get one of them Stage 69 tunes.

True on both points

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997908
Share on other sites

It's actually a really weird comparison... the MX5 is on another level and I kinda question this comparison at all. It'd be closer to compare it to a GTI/Golf/Hatch anything that kicks around.

NC MX5 with a turbo has the right to go up with and beat the FD RX7 or 180SX or any other JDM hero car. That's the comparison that would really ruffle feathers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997917
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

It's actually a really weird comparison... the MX5 is on another level and I kinda question this comparison at all. It'd be closer to compare it to a GTI/Golf/Hatch anything that kicks around.

NC MX5 with a turbo has the right to go up with and beat the FD RX7 or 180SX or any other JDM hero car. That's the comparison that would really ruffle feathers.

Agree, but meh, I think is is based more on LOLS than actually apples to apples, like, who would have thunk a turbo 4 cylinder would not beat a NA 4 cylinder 

I think with just basic N/A mods, like a exhaust and tune, it would be equal to the Mini in its current form, maybe

I know my current 2.5 would "chop the mini" as the midrange now has a night and day difference in power delivery compared to the tuned 2.0, by around 20kwatw and 30nm from around 2k rpm "ish".......

I'm kinda hoping that they do a N/A build, either with the MZR 2.0 or with whatever they decide to use

If I recall correctly they did talk about K swapping one a while ago

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997920
Share on other sites

It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement.

The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z.

This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris'

The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997924
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kinkstaah said:

It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement.

The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z.

This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris'

The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.

People don't always want builds that are overly expensive, or have engineering/registration/insurance issues and head aches that come with them

Whilst big dollar builds, and complicated stuff is interesting to watch, there is only a tiny % of people who would actually use this information, or have the spare finances to drop on said builds, whereas the buy a cheap(ish) cool car, and make it better, with a average budget, that the average Joe or Jane could achieve will always be a winner in my opinion 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997926
Share on other sites

I definitely agree with you there - I never click on content for cars I would never ever be able to get or compete with/against/be seen next to.

Seeing a MX5 compete with a FD RX7 will make people upset though, for sure. Even in 2.5L Turbo form which is pretty grass roots. (or at least as grass roots as classic cars can be)

Yes we're all classic car owners now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997928
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ozdavroz said:

I know which one I'd prefer to have in my garage, and which one I'd actually drive as intended

Their 240Z with the RB26 would be a real nice thing to have in a garage to come out for an occasional weekend cruise

It's such a cool thing in so many ways

Sadly, we have a blue 240Z shell that I walk past every day, just sitting outside a shed at work, it has been slowly disintegrating and falling apart into the ground for the last few years, the owner cannot be found, and I am unable to "claim it" I've been told by work and the RMS, the rust in the body is excessive though, and it has had most of the salvageable stuff, like panels, trim and switch gear stripped off it over the last year or two, work keeps threatening to put it in one of our metal scrap bins, I wish they did though, as it makes Mark sad walking past it

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997936
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, The Bogan said:

I am unable to "claim it" I've been told by work and the RMS, the rust in the body is excessive though, and it has had most of the salvageable stuff, like panels, trim and switch gear stripped off it over the last year or two, work keeps threatening to put it in one of our metal scrap bins,

This could be sold and shipped to the US for many gold pieces. RMS has no say in that. Ask various Western Sydney inhabitants how it works.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997938
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Milkmun said:

Too much MCM talk on your thread, apologies 😂 

But I do hope they keep it NA and not e85.

Mate, I take this thread in random directions on occasion myself, so no foul

I'm a old fan of MCM anyway, I like their banter, and enjoy most of the stuff they do

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997950
Share on other sites

Another new used boot arrived at the painters, it was sent back as there was nearly as much damage as the original one I want to replace 

Finding a clean used boot lid is proving problematic, and I'm not keen on dropping $1500 on a new one from Mazda

Sigh....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997967
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kinkstaah said:

Not feasible to fix the boot lid you had? Damage looked minor/hard to even see 😛

Source: Drove into something recently and you should be happy you didn't!

Nah, the creases were pretty large, and the sheet metal is pretty thin and hard to work out, time alone is in the hours to fix, and would probably have more bog than I would be happy with

In other, more happy news, I gave MX5 Mania a call and they have a few clean boots available for $400 a peice, I've contacted Fineline and given them their contact details, I'm a idiot for not thinking of them sooner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/5/#findComment-7997973
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
×
×
  • Create New...