Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

Dose is unaware just how much fun 145-150kw would be in a 2.5L NC MX5. It would be one of the most fun things to drive to ever grace SAU.

This is a controversial subject really, the whole power vs fun thing I mean

And this is the main reason I got back into a MX5

Of the last few notable daily cars I've owned whilst I have frequented SAU

R33 GTS-t: fun, but because I'm a idiot I modified well past a reliable fun car and ended up hating it, although that was my fault because I tried to have a daily cruiser and race car all in one, the family called it the sometimes car, because sometimes it was working, sometimes it was broken, gladly sold it

NB MX5: brilliant car, thrashed the Bejebus out of it, but, again, was stupid and deleted the air con, power steering and stripped the interior out, whilst still fun, and reliable, and super cheap on consumables, it was not a fun place to be going on long cruises, I did love it, but basically every family member hated going anywhere in it, sadly sold it

2015 WRX STI: soulless thing that looked like your average Kia sedan and had that horrible boxer engine with glass ringlands, the family did like it though, that thing was one of my stupidest purchases and I still regret it

2017 Toyota 86: 😪 if I didn't crash it, I would probably still have it, it was a fun little thing, even with that horrible boxer engine, the family did like it, the only reason I didn't get another 86, or, BRZ was the boxer engine, I should have learnt after owning the STI, but I'm a idiot

VX SS: great cruiser, fits the whole family, and was fast as.....in a straight line, but a big fat thing, so no enjoyment throwing it around corners, the family was unimpressed with the whole boganness of if, but they did admit it was a comfy place to sit on long cruises

As for the NC, I feel it is perfect for what I want, or need out of of a car, whether I'm cruising the Hwy, back roads, twisties or peak hour traffic, the Mrs doesn't mind driving it either, or cruising in it as well, although she does bump her head of the roof nearly every time she gets in, which is farking hilarious, and the kids love taking it for a thrash as well

So basically, I've had constantly more fun, and way less headache and heartache, both on the track and on the street, in low powered cars,  go figure.....LOL

One thing though, the Mrs has stated that the cams have made the exhaust sound much louder, which they have, but it doesn't bother me, in fact, I actually like it, but, to negate any future comments from the Minister for War and Finances I may look at some changes to the rear muffler set-up to drop the volume down a tad to appease her when we are out and about in it

  • Like 4
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-7999905
Share on other sites

The car revs up through the gears much better/faster now, and fuel consumption doesn't really seem to have be affected either on a Hwy cruise, which wasn't expected 

The FAB9 intake manifold has been problematic sourcing though, I've contacted Plasmaman to ask about their intake, which you can get different runner lengths spec'd, and, their different options for throttle bodies 

The only real physical drawback with the Plasmaman intake is how to connect it to my current OEM style airbox, as FAB9 make a OEM style back half of the airbox to suit the larger diameter throttle body, and all that is required is a 30°bend silicone pipe to mate the throttle body to the airbox

Car also goes in for some exhaust work in a week or so to fit the biggest resonator they can fit clearance wise in the front pipe to help remove some of the drone, there isn't alot of realestate under there, a rough guesstimation is it will only be about 3-400mm long and maybe 90-100mm diameter, and with a 60mm exhaust that doesn't leave alot of space for the internal volume of the resonator to do its thing

I'm thinking I may need to bin the "high flow" 100 cell cat for something a bit more substantial, yeah, and restrictive, like a 200-400 cell, to help, but, I have ample room for a really large bodied cat to replace the current one which has around a 4" diameter body

I may look around in the recycling bins and see if I can find a massive newish cat that was "replaced" with some new full exhaust system that the local exhaust shop in Western Sydney is doing

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000118
Share on other sites

I know it's an entirely different engine, but I noticed practically 0 difference removing or adding 2x 3in (5inch body) 400cell cats (one in each bank) with regards to sound.

So changing the cat to change drone I suspect will have very very, very, very, very, very very minimal impact.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000120
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

200 cell cat will probably help.

Do you have room to tee off a Helmholtz resonator anywhere along the exhaust? These can do wonders for drones, with a little experimentation with regards to length.

Not alot of room in the front or mid pipe to play with Helmholtz chambers, plus they are pretty hit and miss getting the length and volume right, and time is money when it comes to trial and error testing at a exhaust shop, it isn't like test fitting mufflers or resonators

From previous experience with exhausts and trying to tone down the volume and eliminate some drone, a resonator in the mid pipe typically make it much better,  and even possibly stop Jackie complaining about it, me, I really don't notice it that much, but, I am pretty deaf 🤣

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000121
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Bogan said:

Not alot of room in the front or mid pipe to play with Helmholtz chambers, plus they are pretty hit and miss getting the length and volume right, and time is money when it comes to trial and error testing at a exhaust shop, it isn't like test fitting mufflers or resonators

From previous experience with exhausts and trying to tone down the volume and eliminate some drone, a resonator in the mid pipe typically make it much better,  and even possibly stop Jackie complaining about it, me, I really don't notice it that much, but, I am pretty deaf 🤣

Buy her some ear plugs.

 

Or, wear earplugs so you also can't hear Jackie whining...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000126
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Bogan said:

trial and error testing at a exhaust shop

Is actually easier than you might think. Assuming you have a spot, youfab up the branch, then just hang a longer than you can fit length of pipe down from there, and chop bits off piece by piece and decde which length was the quietest/nicest, then just put that length up in the place where it will fit. Clever folk can actually make like a trombone slide type arrangement so you can just play it like an instrument to find the best length.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000127
Share on other sites

Exhaust front pipe has been modified and the car is now a much nicer place to be cruising around in

Volume hasn't really changed much, although it has toned down by getting a bit of a deeper sound, also there's no raspyness or noticeable drone, well, to my deaf old ears, hopefully it is "Jackie approved" next time we are out and about in the car 🤔

It still has a little "fluffiness" but only on idle from the cam, much less than before, but there's still a little bit there, liveable, but noticeable when I'm sitting with my head near the exhaust outlet critiquing it harshly 

Maybe it could be removed by playing around with the cam timing a bit, but, currently it is at spec from the Kelford cam card, so I'm living with it until I stop procrastinating and decide on what fancy pants intake plenum and throttle body I want to get, and then send the car off again for more modifications that are not really needed 🤣

All in all,  I'm winning 😁

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000507
Share on other sites

So, no videos, but, the FAB9 Elite manifold and 68mm Bosch throttle bodies are in stock, but, not the rear part of the air box

The FAB9 rear airbox thingie is made with a 3" intake pipe, to suit the 3" intake pipe size of a 68mm throttle body 

When they get some more in stock is currently unknown as I'm waiting for FAB9 to reply with a ETA on resupply, my assumption is they outsource their plastic printing stuff to "china", and with the current "tariff war" going on in 'Merica it could be on hold for an undisclosed time

Should I pull the pin on the Intake and throttle body, and wait for the airbox?????, that's what I'm thinking...

1. Would the standard 2.75" OEM intake on the air box really be that much of a restriction compared to the 3" naturally aspirated??????

2. If I don't get the 3" FAB9 airbox fitted at the same time as the intake and throttle body will it need a retune, when/if it eventually turns up??????

Raw__86136.jpg.0383745037cc9e391d90ec8cb1ddf435.jpg70mm_throttle_body__93228.png.6e2330b531850909290bbb0fb2eac2b4.pngb4b6f142-f0ec-4c70-a51e-a13e5cdfc02f__87822.jpg.e4a37aee0fff7fd89ee2e70c8952cafb.jpg

As I'm impulsive, to a fault, decisions will be made within....."what's the time now"???....let's say 12 hours......LOL

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000665
Share on other sites

So, what did you decide?

If these items were going in and out of stock, you could at least order the two in-stock pieces.

Also, I'd say the stock bit of airbox isn't that restrictive to your NA motor. To test if it is, fit a vacuum gauge between the airbox and throttle body. At WOT do you measure any vacuum?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000669
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MBS206 said:

So, what did you decide?

If these items were going in and out of stock, you could at least order the two in-stock pieces.

Also, I'd say the stock bit of airbox isn't that restrictive to your NA motor. To test if it is, fit a vacuum gauge between the airbox and throttle body. At WOT do you measure any vacuum?

I decided to "spend baby spend", and "risk it for the biscuit"

2 Orders were made buying parts that I "don't really need but really really want" totalling $2.5k AUD

1: In stock items (intake plenum and throttle body)

2: The airbox thingie, with no real ETA for them getting more stock, so patience will be required 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000672
Share on other sites

I mean from V8 world there are gains to be made in intakes and such over stock items, but definitely only if you tune them. We're talking about I dunno, 10kw here and there on a 300KW v8, gains made by tuning in the 0.2 AFR that it changes so YES but also no you won't notice it other than the sound.

Duct the air as mentioned 750,000 times and you will notice happier IAT's which definitely make a difference N/A. I mean my unsubstantiated guess is you'd go from 140kw with everything stock (after cams) to 145kw with everything and a tune :p

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000673
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

I mean from V8 world there are gains to be made in intakes and such over stock items, but definitely only if you tune them. We're talking about I dunno, 10kw here and there on a 300KW v8, gains made by tuning in the 0.2 AFR that it changes so YES but also no you won't notice it other than the sound.

Duct the air as mentioned 750,000 times and you will notice happier IAT's which definitely make a difference N/A. I mean my unsubstantiated guess is you'd go from 140kw with everything stock (after cams) to 145kw with everything and a tune 😛

Yeah, playing with naturally aspirated is not smart bang for your buck power wise, but then I've never been known for being smart when it comes to cars and modifications 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000674
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Bogan said:

Yeah, playing with naturally aspirated is not smart bang for your buck power wise, but then I've never been known for being smart when it comes to cars and modifications 

Really, anyone modifying a car isn't being financially smart. We're doing it for the things we love.

And honestly, a high revving, light, NA car is actually pretty darn fun. I used to have a Swift Sport, and I miss that thing as a daily, and yes, doing something like some intake and exhaust stuff would have made minimal gains, but would have bought an even bigger smile :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000676
Share on other sites

We have 2x Swifts and my plans for a Swift, unfortunately, do not extend to an intake and an exhaust.

I've been having dirty thoughts about a 2.5L Suzi V6, AWD gearbag out of a suitable donor, rear floorpan graft to take the rear cradle from same, and either trumpets of evil or a small supercharger. If I'm going to make noise in a Swift, I want it to be anti-social, evil handling and rough.

Probably need to be fully stripped inside, matt black paint, plastic windows, 7" wide wheels, big brakes, silly suspension, etc etc etc.

I have no idea if any of the proposed driveline components could take the pain. But it would be a hoot finding out.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000677
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, as for the intake parts, part supply/delivery is currently problematic 

As the parts are not made in the US (probably China) new tariffs are making things slow to happen, thanks Trump

The joint I am getting the intake parts from, FAB9, are in the US, typically they are delivered to the US then sent out from there to, well, here, or wherever 

FAB9 are currently looking at shipping directly from the supplier to avoid tariff hits,  so now I'm waiting until that little chestnut gets sorted out

My impatience is blossoming nicely 

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000979
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Bogan said:

So, as for the intake parts, part supply/delivery is currently problematic 

As the parts are not made in the US (probably China) new tariffs are making things slow to happen, thanks Trump

The joint I am getting the intake parts from, FAB9, are in the US, typically they are delivered to the US then sent out from there to, well, here, or wherever 

FAB9 are currently looking at shipping directly from the supplier to avoid tariff hits,  so now I'm waiting until that little chestnut gets sorted out

My impatience is blossoming nicely 

 

 

Drop shipping isn't hard for them to sort out...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/page/9/#findComment-8000981
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...