Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Im sorry for the long post im hoping someone may have the solution to my car not starting. Ive been restoring a 1994 R33 GTST (Series 1) for a few months. 

The Issue: 

- When everything's together on the fuel rail the car cranks but wont start.

- but when I disconnect the fuel pump and hold throttle open it will be hard but it will start. I can then put the plug back on and the car will run normal. If i turn it off and try again it wont be able to start.

- this first started when my mechanic and I put the intake back on (after fixing coolant leaks), then for some reason when I changed a fuel dampener on the return line the Issue temporary resolved but came back a week later.

 

Things about the car:

- it sat for about 4 years but was able to start and run (it had a coolant leak back then which was from corrosion. All cooling system has been fixed)

- replaced the old fuel and the fuel pump as it stopped working, i replaced it with the same size fuel pump it had which was a walbro 255 

- alot of things have been replaced, timing belt, splitfire coilpacks, spark plugs, Rocker gaskets. Basically alot of things have been refreshed and the car was running fine.

- It ran for a week well after replacing the fuel dampener. Then same issue arose. I replaced FPR with a SARD FPR, also replaced the injectors and rail (also verified that the injectors were working), checked spark looks ok (maybe a bit weak). Ive cleaned up all the grounds too.

- ive tested all the lines (return and inlet are not blocked.)

 

I've heard that it could be fuel pump losing voltage during cranking? (I can ground the grey wire on the fuel pump plug) but this doesn't make sense as ive got constant fuel pressure on my gauge and the car will be able to start when there's no fuel going into the rail (it can start also if i just run inlet into the return). So i think this points to too much fuel/not enough spark.

At this point im thinking to just recheck my grounds and possibly any sensors.

Please share any help. TIA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486562-strange-issue-rb25det-wont-start/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Also, it is just about triangularity. The less angle, the easier it physically is to do. Think of the amount of slip you're getting, as how hard you need to push an object. More slip, equals pushing way harder. Then the ramp is how steep the hill is. The Accel is less slip, which means it takes less pushing (less slip) to get it to be able to push apart. However, the steeper sides on the decell means it will take a lot more pushing (slip) to get it up the ramp.
    • It's the angle of the ramp from the vertical. You're measuring from the horizontal. To convert, take 90* minus your angle reference = Nismo Angle.
    • I agree, thus 45 degree is the *max* force one could apply to it. This is similar to what I've seen in uh... simulations... which allow you to play with diff ramp angles. Anything higher (or lower) than 45 degree would produce less force as 45 is the max... triangley.  I would state the 1 way is 90 degree, at least this is how my brain and other ways of explaining it refer to it. 90 degree also effectively acted completely open. I realise Nismo refer to it not as 90 (or 89) but "1". So I'm not understanding the angle on which these angles are based.
    • Spotted at Top Ryde shopping centre on the weekend
    • Yes. Do  thought experiment. Make the left ramp, the 45° ramp, one degree steeper. It will then be 44° from the vertical. What happens to the forces? Too hard to tell? Well, add one more degree, and then keep doing that until it looks exactly like the near vertical wall of the 1-way opening. I would suggest that every degree less than 45° (from vertical) reduces the reaction force, if continually removing them from 45 gets you back to the 1-way profile.
×
×
  • Create New...